AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

aei logo

AEI This Week

AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

2025 IRVING KRISTOL AWARD

Honoring Gordon S. Wood

November 22, 2025

On Monday, AEI honored renowned American historian Gordon S. Wood with the Irving Kristol Award at our 2025 Annual Dinner. Watch AEI President Robert Doar’s remarks, Dr. Wood’s acceptance speech, and a tribute video about Dr. Wood’s career.

wood

This month, AEI launched the new Center for the Future of the American University (CFAU), codirected by Benjamin Storey and Jenna Silber Storey to develop and advance our scholarship on higher education reform. Visit the new CFAU website to learn more about these efforts and find new writing on liberal education, civic thought, viewpoint diversity, and other related issues.

 

As the GOP faces the prospect of a post-Trump future, AEI Economic Policy Studies Director Michael R. Strain urges the party to recover the fundamental, conservative values it has jettisoned under the president’s leadership.

 

In two upcoming cases, Trump v. Slaughter and Trump v. Cook, the Supreme Court will consider the extent of the president’s ability to remove officials from the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Reserve. Writing in the Yale Journal on Regulation, administrative state expert Philip Hamburger explains why the president possesses a constitutional power to remove executive officers.

 

The AEI Housing Center has developed light-touch density policies that are designed to address America’s housing affordability crisis by converting single-family lots into duplexes, triplexes, and townhomes. In a new AEI Economic Perspectives report, AEI Housing Center Codirector Tobias Peter and economist Stan Veuger demonstrate how these policies could work in the District of Columbia.

 

AEI This Week will be off on November 29 for the Thanksgiving holiday. The newsletter will resume on December 6.

 

Interim Orders, the Presidency, and Judicial Supremacy

 

In a new essay for the Harvard Law Review, law professor and Department of Justice veteran Jack Goldsmith analyzes 18 interim orders to reveal how the Supreme Court is responding to the Trump presidency. Goldsmith argues that the Court has focused on expanding its ultimate authority to interpret federal law—against both the president and lower courts. Goldsmith shows how this trend culminated in Trump v. CASA, which ended universal injunctions from lower courts but produced an unprecedented executive branch pledge to respect the Supreme Court’s supremacy. 

More from AEI

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Ford Needs Workers, but American Schools Aren’t Giving Them the Education Needed

Robert Pondiscio | New York Post

 

The Last Gasp of the Climate Thought Police

Roger Pielke Jr. | The Honest Broker

 

What Trump’s Executive Order on Foster Care Gets Wrong—and Right

Naomi Schaefer Riley | Deseret News

 

New Student Loan Data Show a Historic Spike in Borrowers Falling Behind

Preston Cooper | AEIdeas

 

Real Estate Red Flag: How Hidden Blue-State Policies Are Pricing Out Homeowners

Howard Husock | Fox Business

PODCASTS AND VIDEOS

Allies, Autocrats, and AI

James Pethokoukis and Hal Brands | Political Economy

 

A Spark of Literary Genius

Christopher J. Scalia and Frances Wilson | The Back of the Book

 

Education and the Second Trump Administration, 303 Days In

Nat Malkus et al. | The Report Card with Nat Malkus

 

Federal Agencies and the Future of Presidential Power

Tevi Troy et al. | The National Affairs Podcast

 

What Is Going On with Trump’s China Deal? Scott Lincicome Explains.

Danielle Pletka et al. | What the Hell Is Going On?

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

opening_quote

Here is a prediction. The Trump administration will lose some of these cases on issues it cares a lot about. And when it loses, it will comply with the ‘judgments and opinions’ of the Court—not because it is constitutionally compelled to do so, or due to Sauer’s pledge, but because the political foundations of judicial review demand it and because Trump does not yet have the power or the context to ignore or bully the Court the way that Lincoln and FDR did.

closeing_quote

—Jack Goldsmith

Ensure delivery  |  Subscribe

 

American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research 
 Robert Doar, President 


1789 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20036

202.862.5800 | www.aei.org

 Unsubscribe from the link below

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
Podcast Logo New_Gray

Donate to AEI in support of defending and promoting freedom, opportunity, and enterprise.

This message is for: [email protected] | Manage preferences or Unsubscribe