In my 30 years as a lawyer, I have had a lot of strange weeks. But this one was among the weirdest. On Monday, a federal court blocked Texas’ new congressional map. The opinion, authored by a judge appointed by Donald Trump, concluded that the Trump-approved map enacted this summer by the Texas Legislature was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
In my 30 years as a lawyer, I have had a lot of strange weeks. But this one was among the weirdest.
On Monday, a federal court blocked Texas’ new congressional map. The opinion, authored by a judge appointed by Donald Trump, concluded that the Trump-approved map enacted this summer by the Texas Legislature was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
My law firm litigated the case. Democracy Docket covered the 10-day hearing from start to finish. I was very familiar with the constitutional infirmities of the Texas map. I had been writing for weeks that I thought there was a good chance the court would rule as it did. Yet few listened.
Then, suddenly, on Monday, the entire legacy media woke up and realized that Trump’s gambit to rig the maps for 2026 might have collapsed into a spectacular failure. My phone started ringing. Reporters wanted to interview me and get my reaction. My advice: Read Democracy Docket.
Yet that was not what made this week so weird....
Become a premium member to unlock the full article, where Marc dives into:
Why he didn’t settle when Trump sued him
How the Texas’ redistricting dissent involves him and George Soros
What’s next in his journey to the Supreme Court
For $120/year, upgrade to our premium membership and support Democracy Docket’s team in keeping you informed on the latest news about voting and elections in the courts.
We also understand that not everyone is able to make this commitment, which is why our free daily and weekly newsletters aren’t going anywhere! If you prefer not to receive samples of our premium content and only want our free daily and weekly newsletters, you can opt out here.