COVID-19 has injected turmoil into Bangladesh's economy; Filipinos in U.S. are more highly educated, have higher incomes than U.S. immigrants overall
Migration Policy Institute Logo
To ensure email delivery directly to your inbox, please add [email protected] to your address book and migrationpolicy.org to your safe senders list.
Migration Information Source Logo
July 15, 2020


Also in the Newsletter

Have You Read?

International Students in the United States


Diminishing Solidarity: Polish Attitudes toward the European Migration and Refugee Crisis

Vulnerable to COVID-19 and in Frontline Jobs, Immigrants Are Mostly Shut Out of U.S. Relief



Keep up with the Source

Subscribe
Not on the list? Continue receiving these updates by subscribing today.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to the RSS feed to keep up with the latest articles.

Follow MPI


MPI Is Hiring

The Migration Policy Institute seeks exceptional candidates for two new positions. Learn more and please share with your networks!


Senior Policy Analyst–Latin America and Caribbean Migration Policy


Communications Officer

Bangladeshi migrants in Egypt wait to return home. Feature
COVID-19 Pandemic Profoundly Affects Bangladeshi Workers Abroad with Consequences for Origin Communities
Bangladesh is one of the world’s largest migrant-origin countries, and money sent home by its workers abroad is crucial to an economy that has become one of the more vibrant ones in South Asia. Against this backdrop, the COVID-19 pandemic has injected turmoil into the economy as Bangladeshi migrants have lost their jobs, families are seeing reduced remittances, and would-be migrant workers have had to shelve their plans to work abroad.

A Jeepney in the Historic Filipinotown neighborhood of Los Angeles. Spotlight
Filipino Immigrants in the United States in 2018

Immigration from the Philippines to the United States has been taking place for more than a century, escalating towards the end of the 20th century. Filipinos now represent the fourth-largest U.S. immigrant group. Compared to the overall foreign-born population, Filipinos are more highly educated, are more likely to be naturalized U.S. citizens, have higher incomes and lower poverty rates, are less likely to be uninsured, and have greater English proficiency.


Editor's Note

After the most sweeping restrictions on movement in decades, the world—or at least part of it—is beginning to imagine the end of border closures. Limitations on mobility stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic remain widespread, both internationally and, in countries such as Australia, internally. Economies have spiraled, migrants have been left stranded, and access to asylum has shrunk.

In recent weeks, the European Union has begun experimenting with what it might look like for countries to reopen, first by encouraging Member States to recommit to free movement and providing guidance allowing residents of 15 non-EU countries access to the bloc.

By early indications, the transition is neither smooth nor uniform. Major powers such as the United States, Russia, and Brazil are excluded, and China’s addition is contingent on Beijing granting reciprocal access for EU travelers. Hungary, which lifted many of its border controls in May, reversed course this week and will now bar foreigners from certain high-risk countries and require quarantines for those from countries with a “yellow” risk warning. Europeans from areas with high rates of COVID-19, including Sweden and Portugal, will face quarantines at some borders, including those of Belgium and Estonia.

The EU guidelines include exemptions for long-term residents, asylum seekers, and people “with an essential function or need,” including seasonal agricultural workers and medical professionals.

Border restrictions have been rolled back in a few other countries, many of which are small island states or places dependent on tourism. But by and large, the European Union’s stutter-steps toward reopening remain the exception, with much of the world maintaining partial or total restrictions on movement. On July 9, the International Organization for Migration reported 220 countries, territories, or areas had issued travel restrictions.

Given the tenacity of the coronavirus, full return to pre-pandemic mobility seems far off. In the meantime, one strategy gaining popularity is the adoption of “travel bubbles” for small groups of countries, allowing citizens and residents to travel within the zone while limiting access to foreigners. Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia created the first such European bubble in May. A trans-Tasman bubble had been proposed for Australia, New Zealand, and some countries in the Asia-Pacific, but was put on hold amid renewed outbreaks. 

Bilateral travel agreements are also on the rise. The United Kingdom has set up “travel corridors” to dozens of countries—including tropical locales popular with summer travelers—without mandates for quarantine. Since April, China has sought bilateral “fast-track” agreements with countries including South Korea and Singapore, although the scheme have been limited to sponsored travelers who are subjected to COVID-19 testing and other measures.

Even when broader mobility resumes, it could become the norm for border officials to require testing and contact tracing. As MPI’s Meghan Benton wrote in May, the coming months will force countries to make tough decisions that could have far-reaching consequences. A long journey awaits, but Europe’s new experiment amounts to a tentative first step.

Best regards,

Julian Hattem

Editor, Migration Information Source

[email protected]


If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, you can unsubscribe.

The Migration Information Source is a project of the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank in Washington, DC dedicated to analysis of the movement of people worldwide.

Copyright @ 2020 Migration Policy Institute. All rights reserved.
MPI | 1400 16th St. NW, Suite 300 | Washington, DC 20036
ph: (001) 202-266-1940 | fax: (001) 202-266-1900
[email protected]