“Things happen.”
With those two dismissive words, President Donald Trump explained away the 2018 murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi — while sitting in the Oval Office next to his guest, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the man U.S. intelligence says ordered the killing.
This all played out Tuesday at the White House, as Trump defended Prince Mohammed and absolved him of having any role in the murder of the Post columnist.
When asked about Khashoggi’s murder, Trump told reporters, “A lot of people didn’t like that gentleman that you’re talking about. Whether you like him or didn’t like him, things happen, but (the crown prince) knew nothing about it. And we can leave it at that. You don’t have to embarrass our guest by asking a question like that.”
The Washington Post’s Michael Birnbaum, Susannah George and Natalie Allison wrote, “Trump’s dismissive language offered the highest-level confirmation yet that Mohammed will face few consequences for the killing, as the crown prince makes his first visit to Washington since Khashoggi was dismembered in a Saudi consulate in Turkey.”
Former Washington Post executive editor Marty Baron told TheWrap’s Michael Calderone that Trump’s comments were a “disgrace.” Baron added, “Just when you think Trump has gone as low as possible, he goes still lower.”
Former Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah, who was Khashoggi's editor, wrote on Bluesky, “Trump’s comments are vile.”
The Washington Post wrote a scathing editorial, saying, “These distortions dishonor Khashoggi’s legacy, stand at odds with the facts and are beneath the office of the president.” The board added, “The reality is that while Trump advocates peace through strength, he showed nothing but debility. No doubt other dictators took note. Legitimizing and defending Mohammed this way will embolden him and his ilk to mistreat not just journalists but any Americans — knowing that they’ll probably face no real consequences.”
Not only did Trump defend Prince Mohammed, he verbally attacked ABC News’ Mary Bruce for asking about Khashoggi’s murder. Trump said it was a “horrible, insubordinate and just a terrible question.” He then added, “I think the license should be taken away from ABC, because your news is so fake and it’s so wrong.”
After another question from Bruce about why Trump was waiting on Congress instead of releasing more details about late child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein himself, Trump said to her, “It’s not the question that I mind. It’s your attitude. I think you are a terrible reporter. It’s the way you ask these questions.” (The Associated Press’ David Bauder has more in “Trump attacks ABC News correspondent Mary Bruce in angry response to three sharp questions.”)
The crown prince once again told reporters he was not responsible for Khashoggi’s death, saying it was “painful to hear” about anyone losing his life for “no real purpose.” He added, “We’ve did all the right steps of investigation, et cetera, in Saudi Arabia, and we’ve improved our system to be sure that nothing happened like that. And it’s painful and it’s a huge mistake. And we are doing our best that this doesn’t happen again.”
In 2021, a U.S. intelligence report said Prince Mohammed approved the murder of Khashoggi. The report said, “We base this assessment on the Crown Prince’s control of decisionmaking in the Kingdom, the direct involvement of a key adviser and member of Muhammed bin Salman’s protective detail in the operation, and the Crown Prince’s support for using violent measures to silence dissidents abroad, including Khashoggi.”
The report added, “Since 2017, the Crown Prince has had absolute control of the Kingdom’s security and intelligence organizations, making it highly unlikely that Saudi officials would have carried out an operation of this nature with the Crown Prince’s authorization.”
At the time, The New York Times’ Julian E. Barnes and David E. Sanger wrote, “But the Biden administration took no direct action against Prince Mohammed, the de facto ruler of the kingdom, instead announcing travel and financial sanctions on other Saudis involved in the killing and on members of the elite unit of the Royal Guard who protect the crown prince. The administration concluded it could not risk a full rupture of its relationship with the kingdom, relied on by the United States to help contain Iran, to counter terrorist groups and to broker peaceful relations with Israel. Cutting off Saudi Arabia could also push its leaders toward China.”
However, all appears friendly between Trump and the crown prince. The Post wrote, “Trump offered a chummy welcome to Mohammed in the Oval Office, grasping his hand and wrist while mocking former president Joe Biden for offering a fist bump to the crown prince in 2022 because he did not want to shake hands with a man whose human rights record had been blasted by the U.S. intelligence community.”
Trump said, “Trump doesn’t give a fist pump. I grab that hand. I don’t give a hell where that hand’s been.” Trump added that Prince Mohammed was “one of the most respected people in the world.”
Jason Rezaian, The Washington Post’s director of press freedom initiatives, told NPR, "(We) at The Washington Post will continue to remind you that one of our colleagues in the not-so-distant past was murdered. That’s not something we can just wipe under the rug or forget about.”
In a lengthy statement, the National Press Club wrote, in part, that it was “deeply troubled” by Trump’s comments, adding, “Mr. Khashoggi's murder inside a diplomatic facility was a grave violation of human rights and a direct attack on press freedom. That fact is not in dispute.”
And Liesl Gerntholtz, managing director of the PEN/Barbey Freedom to Write Center, said, “President Trump’s reckless and dismissive response to the brutal murder of columnist Jamal Khashoggi seven years ago is an absolute outrage. By brushing aside the clear findings of U.S. intelligence agencies pointing to senior Saudi involvement, and by demeaning and insulting the victim himself, Trump sends a chilling message to authoritarian governments: The United States will look the other way when writers and journalists are silenced as long as it serves the administration’s interests.”