The connection between President Donald Trump and late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein seems like a big story.
How big?
That’s not an easy answer.
We really don’t know how big the story is because we don’t know how strong the connection was between Trump and Epstein. Emails released this week appear to indicate that Trump might have been aware of something. Beyond that, we just don’t know.
One email from Epstein to himself in February 2019 read that Trump knew about the sexual abuse of underage girls, but never participated.
Epstein wrote, “Trump knew of it. and came to my house many times during that period. He never got a massage.”
In an email to author Michael Wolff in January 2019, Epstein wrote, “Of course (Trump) knew about the girls.”
But again, news organizations have to be cautious when talking about Epstein and Trump.
CNN, for example, was super careful. In one example, a host said, “We want to be clear. President Trump did not receive or send any of the messages, which largely predated his time as president. He has not been accused of any criminal wrongdoing in connection with Epstein or (Epstein’s partner Ghislaine) Maxwell.”
So, a couple of thoughts on that. For one, that’s all true at the moment. And, two, Trump has shown no hesitation to sue whenever he feels he has been slighted or mistreated by the media. So news outlets are going to be careful and responsible, as they should be.
That doesn’t mean CNN or most serious news organizations are backing off on the story.
The Washington Post played this analysis from Karen Tumulty prominently on its website: “Epstein is the one issue that persistently splits Trump from his base.” At one point Thursday, The New York Times homepage had four stories related to Epstein.
CNN’s website had analysis from Aaron Blake: “The political danger of the Epstein files for Trump.” Blake wrote, “If President Donald Trump has nothing to hide vis-à-vis Jeffrey Epstein, he sure has a weird way of showing it. Trump hasn’t been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with the convicted sex offender, but he’s doing a great job of looking suspicious.”
Politico displayed two stories prominently on its website: “Latest Epstein files knock White House on its heels” and “The 9 most shocking revelations in the Epstein docs.”
And The Atlantic’s Jonathan Chait mocked the White House with “Wait, Are the Epstein Files Real Now?”
And on and on.
Don’t expect this story to slow down or disappear or quickly be replaced by the next thing in the news cycle. This story has legs.
But news organizations are going to be careful with exactly what they write and say.