From The Angry Democrat: Matt Diemer <[email protected]>
Subject The Epstein Files: The Litmus Test for Congress
Date November 13, 2025 5:07 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
View this post on the web at [link removed]

Next week, Congress will face one of the most important votes in modern history; whether to release the Jeffrey Epstein files. Make no mistake: this is a litmus test for whether Congress will actually do the will of the people or continue to protect the powerful.
This vote isn’t just about crimes. It’s about transparency, trust, and whether the government still belongs to the people or to the institutions that protect themselves.
Thanks for reading The Angry Democrat: Matt Diemer! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Stage One: The Vote Itself
The first test is simple. Will Congress, both Democrats and Republicans, come together to release the Epstein files — even though the President and the FBI Director reportedly don’t want it to happen?
It should be a no-brainer. Yet somehow, this is a debate. Somehow, Congress is actually struggling with whether to make the truth public. The fact that this vote is even controversial tells you everything about how broken Washington has become.
If they can’t even bring themselves to vote for transparency in a case that involves global human trafficking and the abuse of minors then what can they/we stand for?
Stage Two: The Redactions
Let’s say the vote passes. The next question is whether the files will actually be released or just heavily redacted into meaninglessness.
In a case this high-profile, there should be no sweeping redactions to protect reputations or institutions. Yes, victims deserve privacy, and due process still matters. But the public also deserves the full scope of truth.
We cannot keep living in a system where the powerful are shielded by blacked-out pages. If names are in those files, they need to be there for the world to see — not hidden under the pretext of “ongoing investigations.”
Stage Three: Real Transparency
The third and final test is what happens after the release. Will the public actually have access to the evidence? Or will it be buried in bureaucracy and spin?
Transparency means full access to the files in a way that allows journalists, researchers, and the public to review the evidence for themselves. It means no hidden archives, no selective leaks, and no quiet Friday document dumps that disappear by Monday morning.
This must include everyone involved — no matter how powerful. Banks, hedge funds, airlines, intelligence agencies, foreign governments, and any political figure connected to Epstein’s network must be subject to public scrutiny.
Because if Congress lets any of them off the hook, the people will know it.
Why This Is a True Litmus Test
This vote is a turning point. It will show us if Congress actually represents the people or if it’s still a shield for the elite.
Will they do the will of the people?
The public has made it clear: they want the truth. They want justice. Even if the truth is ugly, even if it’s uncomfortable, the people have asked for transparency. If Congress refuses, it’s proof they no longer serve us.
Who’s really in control?
Are they protecting the public, or are they protecting the rich, the connected, and the institutions with too much to lose? This is about power — who has it, and who’s willing to challenge it.
How will they spin it?
Watch carefully. You’ll know everything from the way the media and lawmakers talk to you after the vote. Will they downplay it? Will they gaslight the public into believing it’s not important? Or will they finally admit that the American people are capable of handling the truth?
The Stakes for Democracy
If Congress fails this test, the consequences will be deep and long-lasting.
When transparency dies, democracy follows. The American people already distrust the system. Every cover-up, every lie, every redacted page drives that distrust deeper.
If this vote fails — or if the files are released in a meaningless, sanitized form — it will push the country further toward one of three outcomes:
Capitulation: People give up on government entirely, stop voting, and stop believing that democracy can deliver truth or justice.
Radicalization: The public swings hard to the extremes, looking for anyone willing to burn down the system.
Reorganization: A movement of people who have simply had enough — an organized, vocal, mobilized demand for a government that is truly accountable to the people.
The Bottom Line
This vote isn’t about Epstein anymore. It’s about the integrity of our democracy.
Congress has a choice: do the will of the people and release the truth or prove once and for all that they answer only to power and campaign contributions.
If they fail this test, it won’t just be another disappointment. It will be the day Americans finally stop believing that Washington is capable of policing itself.
The question now is whether anyone in Congress still has the spine to stand up for the people who sent them there.
Thanks for reading The Angry Democrat: Matt Diemer! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Unsubscribe [link removed]?
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: n/a
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: n/a
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a