[[link removed]]

SUNDAY SCIENCE: THE DNA HELIX CHANGED HOW WE THOUGHT ABOUT OURSELVES
 
[[link removed]]


 

Carl Zimmer
November 7, 2025
The New York Times
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ “The laws of inheritance are quite unknown,” Charles Darwin
acknowledged in 1859. The discovery of DNA’s shape altered how we
conceived of life itself. _

The X-ray crystallography by Rosalind Franklin in 1952 that assisted
James Watson and Francis Crick in their discovery of the structure of
DNA., Science Source

 

The discovery of the structure of DNA in the early 1950s is one of the
most riveting dramas in the history of science, crammed with brilliant
research, naked ambition, intense rivalry and outright deception.

There were many players, including Rosalind Franklin, a wizard of
X-ray crystallography, and Francis Crick, a physicist in search of the
secret of life. Now, with the death of the American geneticist James
Watson
[[link removed]] at
97 on Thursday, the last of those players is gone.

That wrenching drama ultimately changed how we conceived of life, and
of ourselves. As the discovery of DNA recedes into history, it becomes
difficult to even imagine how people thought about life before that
breakthrough.

In earlier centuries, natural philosophers would write about a
mysterious “vital force” inside of cells that set life apart from
inanimate matter. Physicians noticed hereditary afflictions carried
down through the generations, but they had no idea of how that
happened.

“The laws governing inheritance are quite unknown,” Charles Darwin
acknowledged
[[link removed]]
in 1859 in “The Origin of Species.”

Darwin went on to tackle that mystery and failed to solve it. He
imagined
[[link removed]] that
particles streamed from cells throughout the body into the sperm and
eggs that gave rise to the next generation.

Gregor Mendel, planting peas in his garden at about the same time,
came closer to a solution. He discovered
[[link removed]] that his plants
inherited colors and other traits in reliable ratios. But he could
only speculate about the factors they passed down to their offspring.

In the early 1900s, biologists rediscovered Mendel and envisioned
those factors as genes. Some believed that genes were merely a
mathematical abstraction
[[link removed]], while others
thought they were physical molecules.

But  they couldn’t agree on which of the many molecules in the cell
were genes. Some thought they were proteins
[[link removed]].
Others looked instead to a mysterious substance we now call DNA.

The work that Watson and others carried out in the early 1950s offered
a strangely simple vision for how life works.

James Watson in the Library of the Human Genome at the Wellcome
Collection in London in 2007.Credit...Jonathan Player for The New York
Times

DNA was made of two strands twisted around each other, each decorated
with four molecular units called bases — a four-letter alphabet for
writing genes. The crucial step by which a cell turned into two cells
was to split those strands apart, and then to add on a second strand
to each of them, faithfully copying the script of the original.

That discovery unlocked  more revelations. In the 1950s and 1960s,
Crick and other researchers worked out the code
[[link removed]] by which
cells use the genes encoded in their DNA to build proteins.

Other scientists showed how mistakes slip into the sequence of DNA —
mutations triggered by radiation and chemicals, for example, or errors
that cells made as they copied their own genes.

 

 

Those mistakes could cause devastating genetic disorders. But they
were also the raw material for natural selection. At last, scientists
had found a molecular basis for Darwin’s theory of evolution.

In 1990, Watson became the first leader of the U.S. government’s
effort to sequence the human genome, the three billion base pairs
[[link removed]]
contained in a cell.

He only lasted in the job for two years
[[link removed]],
but the work went on without him. In 2001, over a decade after the
project began, scientists finally created the first rough draft of a
human genome — an error-riddled collage of several individuals.

Genome sequencing became faster and cheaper in the years that
followed. Today, a person’s genome can be accurately sequenced in a
matter of hours
[[link removed]].

With the cost of genome sequencing having plummeted to a few hundred
dollars, doctors regularly get the genomes of their patients sequenced
to check for inherited diseases. Geneticists can probe our
evolutionary past by resurrecting the genomes of our ancestors
[[link removed]]
who lived hundreds of thousands of years ago.

 

 

Watson may have played a crucial part in opening up the modern age of
molecular biology, but he embraced some ideas about heredity that
existed long before he recognized the double helix.

Into his 90s, he spoke both publicly and privately
[[link removed]]
about his conviction that Black people had genes that made them less
intelligent than white people. The remarks led Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory, which had appointed him as director in 1968, to sever all
ties with him in 2019. “The Laboratory condemns the misuse of
science to justify prejudice,” it said in a statement
[[link removed]].

That prejudice reaches back centuries. In the 1400s, white European
Christians began conceiving of themselves as a distinct group of
people, superior to other groups. Noble families in Spain proudly
declared their ancestry was free of Jewish blood. Native Americans and
Africans were considered natural slaves.

In the 19th century, early American anthropologists
[[link removed]]
claimed scientific justification for racism in the shapes of skulls.
And in the early 1900s, some American scientists asserted that the new
science of genetics provided even more justification
[[link removed]].
Based on that belief, they lobbied for laws to prevent interracial
marriages and to allow the sterilization of people deemed unfit.

The genome sequencing that Watson helped make possible has given
scientists a very different view of humanity. In 2023, for example,
the National Academies of Sciences recommended
[[link removed]]
that scientists not use race as a category in genetic studies. They
pointed out that traditional racial categories are poor proxies for
genetic diversity.

Studies on DNA have pinpointed certain genes that have an influence on
some measures of intelligence
[[link removed]].
But the variation in each gene’s DNA sequence only accounts for a
tiny amount of the variation in people’s test scores. That’s true
of many traits, from  height to the risk of heart disease.

To understand how our DNA shapes our lives, we have to address the
question of how our experience interacts with it. And scientists are
still struggling to answer that question.

Even DNA itself continues to baffle scientists. If you could stretch
out the three billion base pairs in a single human cell, they would
measure over six feet in length. But we can’t think of DNA as just a
simple line of text containing nothing but recipes for proteins.

In fact, our protein-coding genes make up just a tiny fraction of our
DNA, while the rest is a confusing wilderness
[[link removed]]
of genetic on/off switches
[[link removed]]
and parasitic bits of DNA, many of which come from viruses
[[link removed]]
that infected our ancestors.

And in order to squeeze that six feet of DNA into a single cell, it
has to be coiled up in exquisitely complex tangles that change shape
from one second to the next. Some scientists are trying to reconstruct
the three-dimensional movements of DNA to better understand how cells
use it to make the molecules they need to stay alive.

With enough hard work, scientists will solve many of these mysteries
of DNA. But it will take decades rather than a few years, and the
drama will require a cast of scientists far bigger than the one Watson
belonged to.

_CARL ZIMMER writes the “Origins” column and is the author several
books about DNA, including “She Has Her Mother’s Laugh” and
“Life’s Edge.”_

_Subscribe to the NEW YORK TIMES._
[[link removed]]

JAMES WATSON EXEMPLIFIED THE BEST AND WORST OF SCIENCE – FROM
MONUMENTAL DISCOVERIES TO SEXISM AND CUTTHROAT COMPETITION
[[link removed]]ANDOR
J. KISSTHE CONVERSATIONNovember 7, 2025

* Science
[[link removed]]
* biology
[[link removed]]
* DNA
[[link removed]]
* genetics
[[link removed]]
* History
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Bluesky [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]