IL Gov. Pritzker Harbored Truant Texas Dems

[INSIDE JW]

JUDICIAL WATCH, AEF ASK SUPREME COURT FOR ACCESS TO VOTER RECORDS

[[link removed]]

We filed an _amici curiae_
[[link removed]
_(friends
of the court) brief along with the Allied Educational Foundation (AEF)
to the Supreme Court of the United States, asking it to reverse the
Third Circuit’s decision
[[link removed]]
denying the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) standing to sue
for voter information guaranteed under the National Voter Registration
Act
[[link removed]]
(NVRA).

The Public Interest Legal Foundation
[[link removed]],
a nonprofit, public interest
law firm dedicated to election integrity, is suing for access to
Pennsylvania’s voter rolls following a failure to disclose an
estimated 100,000
[[link removed]]
noncitizen registered voter records. Pennsylvania officials reportedly
[[link removed]]
admitted that “for decades, the Department of Motor Vehicles had
allowed non-U.S. citizens to register to vote through the state’s
‘motor voter’ system.”

Our _amici_
[[link removed]]
brief
[[link removed]]
comes in the case _Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Al Schmidt,
Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al._
[[link removed]]
(No. 1590, 1591, 3045, 379)), which is on appeal from the Third
Circuit, where the court denied access to public records requested
under the NVRA’s public disclosure provision. The issue in the case
is whether the Virginia-based nonprofit has standing to sue under the
National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).

In our _amici_ brief, we and AEF argue:

> The denial of access to public records requested under the NVRA’s
> public-disclosure provision, 52 U.S.C. § 20507(i)
>
[[link removed])],
> inflicts a concrete informational injury deeply rooted in centuries
> of common-law tradition.
>
> The Third Circuit’s decision … departs from this precedent by
> imposing a novel “nexus” requirement, demanding plaintiffs prove
> downstream harms beyond the denial itself. This ruling exacerbates a
> sharp and growing circuit split. Circuits like the Fourth adhere to
> this Court’s framework, finding standing upon denial alone.
>
> The Third Circuit’s decision contains serious legal errors and
> directly conflicts with longstanding Supreme Court precedent. This
> Court has held that a person who is denied requested public records
> suffers a concrete injury … [The Third Circuit adopted] a new
> requirement [that] conflicts with previous rulings by this Court on
> this issue.

This case shows the urgent need for citizenship verification for
voting. The Department of Justice should follow up with a national
investigation.

The Allied Educational Foundation is a charitable and educational
foundation dedicated to improving the quality of life through
education. In furtherance of that goal, the Foundation has engaged in
a number of projects, which include educational and health conferences
domestically and abroad. AEF has partnered frequently with us to fight
government and judicial corruption and to promote a return to ethics
and morality in the nation’s public life.

We are a national leader in voting integrity and voting rights. As
part of our work, we have assembled a team of highly experienced
voting rights attorneys who stopped discriminatory elections in
Hawaii, and cleaned up voter rolls in California, Ohio, Indiana, and
Kentucky, among other achievements
[[link removed]].

Robert Popper, a Judicial Watch senior attorney, leads our election
law program. Popper was previously in the Voting Section of the Civil
Rights Division of the Justice Department, where he managed voting
rights investigations, litigations, consent decrees, and settlements
in dozens of states.

We have several federal lawsuits to clean up potentially millions of
names from the voter rolls.

On October 8, 2025, oral arguments
[[link removed]]
were
held in the U.S. Supreme Court in a historic case we filed on behalf
of Congressman Mike Bost and two presidential electors, who are before
the court to vindicate their standing to challenge an Illinois law
allowing the counting of ballots received up to 14 days after Election
Day (_Rep. Michael J. Bost, Laura Pollastrini, and Susan Sweeney v.
The Illinois State Board of Elections and Bernadette Matthews_
[[link removed]
_(No.
1:22-cv-02754, 23-2644, 24-568)).

We recently filed a brief
[[link removed]]
to
the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the Libertarian Party of
Mississippi, opposing the State of Mississippi’s attempt to overturn
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision, which
struck down a law allowing ballots received after Election Day to be
counted.

Federal courts in Oregon
[[link removed]],
California and Illinois
[[link removed]]
recently ruled that Judicial Watch’s lawsuits against those states
may proceed, forcing them to clean their voter rolls.

We announced
[[link removed]]
in May that its work led to the removal of more than five million
ineligible names from voter rolls nationwide.

JUDICIAL WATCH SUES PRITZKER FOR RECORDS ON TEXAS DEMOCRAT LAWMAKERS

Gov. JB Pritzker (D-IL) decided to harbor Texas Democrats, who fled
the state in an effort to derail a congressional redistricting bill,
and we’d like to know more about his actions.

We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against Pritzker for records on the state’s role in providing refuge
to Texas Democrat legislators, who fled their state in an attempt to
deny quorum and block the redistricting vote (_Judicial Watch Inc. v.
Office of the Governor_
[[link removed]]
(No. 2025CH000057)).

Texas’ House Rules Manual states
[[link removed]]
that
“all absentees for whom no sufficient excuse is made may, by order
of a majority of those present, be sent for and arrested, wherever
they may be found, by the sergeant-at-arms or an officer appointed by
the sergeant-at-arms for that purpose, and their attendance shall be
secured and retained.” The state Supreme Court in 2021 upheld
[[link removed]]
that rule, giving
the House the power to arrest absent members to establish a quorum.

We sued in the Circuit Court of Sangamon County, Illinois, County
Department, Chancery Division after Pritzker’s office failed to
respond to an August 2025 FOIA request for:

> All audio/visual recordings, handwritten notes, agendas, minutes,
> and reports related to a meeting or meetings held between Governor
> Pritzker and congressional Democrats at which Texas congressional
> redistricting and/or Illinois possibly housing Texas Democratic
> state lawmakers was discussed.
>
> All audio/visual recordings, handwritten notes, agendas, minutes,
> and reports related to a meeting held between Governor Pritzker and
> Democratic party officials in late June 2025 in Oklahoma regarding
> congressional redistricting matters, as discussed at
>
[link removed].
>
> All emails sent between and among officials in Governor Pritzker’s
> immediate office, including but not limited to Governor Pritzker and
> his chief of staff, regarding Texas congressional redistricting.

On August 3, 2025, more than 50 Texas Democrats fled the state
[[link removed]]
in an attempt to derail a congressional redistricting bill. Pritzker
then announced: “[Texas Democrats] are here in Illinois. We’re
going to do everything we can to protect every single one of them and
make sure that — ’cause we know they’re doing the right thing,
we know that they’re following the law.”

Pritzker’s involvement reportedly began
[[link removed]]
“at a dinner in late June hosted by Oklahoma Democrats, where he
discussed the possibility of helping Texas Democrats fight back
against the redistricting plan with state party chair Kendall Scudder
..”

Pritzker, a billionaire heir to the Hyatt Hotel fortune, appeared
[[link removed]]
on _The Late Show with
Stephen Colbert_ on August 6, 2025, and when asked why the Texas
legislators went to Illinois, the governor responded, “The great
heroes of the House Democratic caucus decided the only thing they
could do in order to stop it was leave Texas. And where did they
decide to come to? The safe haven of the state of Illinois where we
are going to protect them and take care of them.”

Later in the interview, Colbert asked whether the FBI could arrest the
Texas legislators located in Illinois. Pritzker stated, “Frankly in
the state of Illinois, we are not going to let them get taken away. We
are going to protect the Texas House Democrats.... As long as they are
in Illinois, they are safe.”

The Texas Democrats ended their walkout on August 18, 2025. The Texas
state Senate on August 22, 2025, passed the
[[link removed]]
new redistricting map and Republican Gov. Greg Abbott signed it into
law on August 29, 2025.

Pritzker seemed delighted to host the truant Texas Democrat
“heroes,” aiding and abetting an illegal two-week tantrum.

JUDICIAL WATCH SUES AZ GOV. HOBBS OVER IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT
NON-COMPLIANCE

We filed an Arizona Public Records Law lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against Gov. Katie Hobbs for records regarding her office reportedly
ordering state police and the Arizona National Guard to withhold
cooperation from federal immigration enforcement authorities
(_Judicial Watch Inc. v. Office of the Arizona Governor_
[[link removed]
_(No.
CV2025-039217)).

Governor Hobbs’ apparent refusal to allow state resources to support
lawful immigration operations undermines the rule of law and places
law enforcement and other innocent lives at risk.

We sued in Maricopa County Superior Court following the governor’s
office’s “no responsive records” response to a December 17,
2024, records request. The request specifically sought:

* Any communications, memos, or orders issued to state agencies
reflecting a policy of non-participation in federal immigration
enforcement;
* Documentation of any legal analyses or contemplated litigation
related to the governor’s stance on state-level involvement in
immigration law enforcement.

Arizona law states
[[link removed]
“No
official or agency of this state or a county, city, town or other
political subdivision of this state may limit or restrict the
enforcement of federal immigration laws to less than the full extent
permitted by federal law.”

In November 2024, Hobbs responded
[[link removed]]
to a question on whether Arizona’s state police and National Guard
would assist with federal immigration enforcement efforts by stating,
“What I will unequivocally say is that, as governor, I will not
tolerate efforts that are part of misguided policies that harm our
communities, that threaten our communities, that terrorize our
communities, and Arizona will not take part in those…. We will not
be participating in misguided efforts that harm our communities, and
I've been incredibly clear about that.”

Federal supremacy in immigration matters is established by the U.S.
Constitution’s Supremacy Clause
[[link removed]]
and
codified in the Immigration and Nationality Act in Title 8
[[link removed]]
of the U.S. Code. These provisions reserve exclusive authority to the
federal government for the regulation of admission, removal, and
enforcement of immigration laws.

JUDICIAL WATCH SUES EVANSTON MAYOR FOR BREAKING WITH IMMIGRATION LAW

Federal law clearly gives the federal government responsibility for
immigration matters, but the mayor of Evanston, IL, population of
76,000, decided to take matters into his own hands.

We filed an Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against Evanston, IL, Mayor Daniel Biss for records related to
obstruction of federal immigration enforcement (_Judicial Watch Inc.
v. Office of the Mayor_
[[link removed]]
(No. 2025CH11002)).

We sued in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, County
Department, Chancery Division, after the mayor’s office failed to
comply with a September 25, 2025, FOIA request for:

* Records of Biss’s activities related to ICE [U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement] operations, including “Operation Midway
Blitz,” and the protest at the ICE facility in Broadview, IL, where
tear gas was deployed in September 2025.
* Media related to ICE protests and activities, including any of the
city’s photographs, videos or audio recordings depicting Biss’s
participation in ICE-related protests or monitoring.
* Communications involving Biss as related to ICE operations,
protests, or sanctuary city policies.
* License plate camera deactivation.
* Use of city resources and taxpayer time on ICE-related protests.
* Sanctuary city policies and ICE non-cooperation.

On September 8, 2025, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
announced
[[link removed]]
“Operation Midway Blitz,” targeting “the criminal illegal aliens
who flocked to Chicago and Illinois because they knew Governor
Pritzker and his sanctuary policies would protect them and allow them
to roam free on American streets.”

On September 11, 2025, Biss said
[[link removed]]
that upon learning of planned federal immigration enforcement activity
in Evanston, he notified residents so they could “protect
themselves.” He further stated, “We’ve been doing everything we
can to protect our residents from before Donald Trump took office,
passing strong sanctuary laws to make sure police are not cooperating
with federal civil immigration enforcement.” Biss reportedly ordered
Evanston’s license plate cameras turned off after learning the data
was being shared with federal immigration authorities.

On September 19, Biss reportedly was involved in a protest during
which federal law enforcement
[[link removed]]
agents deployed pepper and tear gas at an ICE processing center in
Broadview, IL. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security stated
[[link removed]]
“desperate
politicians want their 15 minutes of fame, and they’re willing to do
it off the backs of our law enforcement…. We will not back down.”

On September 26, tear gas
[[link removed]]
again was used to disperse violent protesters at the Broadview
facility. An ICE spokesperson said two people were arrested, “one of
whom was carrying a firearm.” Also, “rioters and sanctuary
politicians obstructed law enforcement, threw tear gas cans, rocks,
bottles, and fireworks, slashed tires of cars, blocked the entrance of
the building, and trespassed on private property.”

In October 2025, Evanston, IL, issued a press release
[[link removed]]
discussing “ICE-Free Zones” and strategies for “state and local
agencies—including the Secretary of State, the Illinois
Accountability Commission, and the Cook County State’s Attorney’s
Office” to hinder federal immigration enforcement actions.

The mayor of Evanston’s apparent interference with lawful
immigration operations shows disrespect for the rule of law and the
safety of innocent lives.



MAINE LAWMAKER DEFAMES PARENTS PROTESTING TRANS BOYS IN GIRLS’
SPORTS

Leslie Trentalange, an elected official in Kennebunk, Maine, publicly
attacked parents with traditional values. Our _Corruption Chronicles_
blog reports
[[link removed]].

> In a public declaration that is shocking even for an
> attention-seeking liberal politician, an elected official in Maine
> defamed parents who oppose transgender males in girls’ sports and
> restrooms as having “pedophilic tendencies.” Though the
> egregious attack in Kennebunk may seem worse to some, it brings to
> mind when Hillary Clinton called Donald Trump supporters
> “deplorables
>
[[link removed]
> at a New York Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) fundraiser
> during her second failed presidential campaign in 2016. Clinton
> further described Trump supporters to her loyal fans as racist,
> sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamophobic. Years later,
> Clinton doubled down on her reprehensible comments, writing in a
> major newspaper during a campaign to promote her latest book that
> deplorables is “too kind
>
[[link removed]
> for some Trump backers.
>
> The Maine public official who blasted concerned parents is also
> sticking to her highly offensive words, refusing to apologize for
> calling them pedophiles because they want to protect their children.
> The incident occurred a few weeks ago during a school board meeting
> when Kennebunk Select Board member Leslie Trentalange suggested the
> protesting parents have “pedophilic tendencies.” A video of the
> appalling comments is available on the website of the local
> newspaper, which also quotes the elected official in a story
>
[[link removed]]
> of the October 20 school board meeting
>
[[link removed]].
> Referring to parents who object to boys in girls’ sports and
> bathrooms, Trentalange said: “Their obsession with what private
> parts are sitting in between the legs of our students is nothing
> less than creepy and should absolutely be raising eyebrows in and
> around our school district.” She continued even as those in
> attendance, including members of the school board, seemed taken
> aback: “Their obsession with genitalia points not to caring for
> the students in this district, but perhaps to an underlying guilt
> for their own pedophilic tendencies. There is a registry for
> that,” the Kennebunk legislator added.
>
> School Board Chair Matthew Stratford attempted to interrupt
> Trentalange’s tirade, according to the local news report and video
> of the meeting and called her comments “inappropriate.” She kept
> talking however and finished her insulting rant. The unhinged
> lawmaker insisted she did not think her comments were inappropriate
> and that she stood by them. Trentalange is the vice chair of
> Kennebunk’s Select Board
>
[[link removed]
a school board
> liaison, though she reportedly stepped down from that position after
> her offensive testimony at the recent meeting, but remains on the
> Select Board. The Select Board is the town’s governing body and
> consists of seven elected members who serve three-year staggering
> terms. Among their duties and responsibilities are establishing
> policy, supervising Kennebunk’s manager, representing the town on
> various regional and state issues, and providing public leadership.
> The governing body’s code of conduct
>
[[link removed]]
> includes a provision that states “discussions should be conducted
> in a professional manner with all participants treating each other
> with civility and respect.” The code was designed to define the
> behavior, manners and courtesy expected of Select Board members as
> they interact with each other, Town staff, and their constituents
> and requires them to “demonstrate honesty and integrity in every
> action and statement.”
>
> Accusing parents of being pedophiles for trying to shield their
> girls from the detriments of the transgender revolution does not
> seem to demonstrate integrity required under the town’s code for
> elected officials. At a follow-up board meeting Trentalange issued
> what the local newspaper called a “non-apology for calling
> protesting parents pedophiles
>
[[link removed]
> She acknowledged that she made a statement that may have pushed some
> boundaries at the school board meeting, but “avoided in any way
> recanting her inflammatory statements or acknowledging that they
> were inappropriate,” according to the news article. The elected
> official did however apologize to the “queer community” for the
> harm caused by her comments. “If there are folks in the
> marginalized queer community that feel my message did not serve them
> or hurt them in any way, it is that which I regret,” Trentalange
> said. No mention of the girls harmed by outrageous policies that
> allow boys, who are physically much stronger and bigger, to compete
> on their sports teams.

Until next week,



[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024

202.646.5172



© 2017 - 2025, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

View in browser
[[link removed]]