Let parents decide
“On Wednesday, President Trump denounced the CDC guidelines, calling them ‘very tough and expensive’ as well as ‘impractical,’” writes Erica Schweigershausen for The Cut. “A few hours later, Vice-President Pence announced that the CDC would issue new recommendations next week.”
This division within the federal government is one of many examples of how the conversation on school reopenings has shifted into a significantly more heated debate in the past week, with contrasting takes offered by the president, his Department of Education, The American Academy of Pediatrics, and the national teacher unions.
Making these decisions requires answering a series of difficult questions: Can students and families be reasonably assured of their health if they send their students back to school? How much learning loss are we willing to accept if school buildings remain fully or partially shuttered? How should we balance the decision to shutter school buildings against the ability for parents--especially low-income and essential workers--to maintain employment?
If the online discourse over the past two weeks has made anything clear, it’s this: there is no national consensus on the right balance of risks in the way we reopen schools this fall. Any solution that attempts to shoehorn all children and families into a single nationwide approach is destined to fail. Instead, state governments and local districts should provide parents with a menu of options, including a full schedule of in-person schooling, virtual schooling modeled on the most successful models delivered this spring, and a blended schedule that mixes in-person and at home instruction.
With a decision this important, local parents, not the president nor any national group, should decide what is best for their children.
Don’t stop innovating
“Mayor Bill de Blasio announced on Wednesday that public schools would still not fully reopen in September, saying that classroom attendance would instead be limited to only one to three days a week in an effort to continue to curb the coronavirus outbreak,” reported Eliza Shapiro for The New York Times. With the nation’s largest school system finalizing a plan that will keep over a million students at home for several days each week, it’s clear that virtual learning will continue to be a key element in our new reality. Yet it is also clear that the emergency distance learning plans put in place in the spring fell well short of what our kids deserve in far too many communities. What can be done?
The good news is that, unlike in the spring, we now have concrete examples we can learn from. There are schools, districts and CMOs that succeeded in bringing innovation approaches to distance education, many of which we’ve previously highlighted in The New Reality Roundup.
Perhaps not surprisingly, private schools and public charter schools, which enjoy greater flexibility to innovate and adapt, led the way forward. A new poll from EducationNext, for example, found that 45 percent of charter school parents and 39 percent of private school parents said they were “very satisfied” with the instruction and activities provided during the spring shutdown compared to just 29 percent of parents whose children attended district schools.
Charter schools and private schools should continue to press forward in innovating for their students and we should be working hard through the fall to bring these lessons learned into the broader world of schooling in America. If there was ever a time for educators across the country to go “open source,” this is it.