The Threat of Commercial SurrogacyIntercollegiate Review | Conservatism's sharpest voices, curated weekly. ISI's weekly newsletter brings you the best in serious conservative thought.The Dark Side of Commercial SurrogacyAlthough commercial surrogacy is still illegal in some states, the practice is rapidly gaining cultural acceptance. Surrogates now chronicle their surrogacy journeys on social media, encouraging other women to sign contracts with agencies, while celebrities publicly celebrate using surrogates to grow their families. These positive portrayals, however, obscure the grim realities of commercial surrogacy. In an article for First Things, Emma Waters illustrates the inherently exploitative nature of the practice. Surrogacy contracts give the intended parents nearly all the power—an imbalance that, as Waters shows, can lead to devastating outcomes for both the surrogate mother and the baby. Waters also uncovers a troubling avenue for exploitation in commercial surrogacy: foreign nationals’ use of American surrogates to effectively purchase U.S. citizenship. A shocking 41 percent of international surrogacy cycles in the U.S. are for intended parents in mainland China, and some agencies openly advertise the resulting child’s U.S. citizenship as a selling point. In response to such blatantly harmful practices, Waters concludes that we must “boldly declare that some human goods—mothers, children, citizenship, and the bonds between them—are too precious to sell.” Read the rest of her article here.
The Inherent Goodness of LifeThe modern West is gripped by a culture of death. Young adults are scared to bring children into the world, while assisted suicide is gaining acceptance—and even praise—as a supposed solution to suffering. While most people would still profess the value of life (at least after birth), it’s clear that society has forgotten a fundamental truth: it is good to be alive. Writing for The University Bookman, John Ehrett defends the inherent goodness of human existence while reviewing Martin Lockerd’s recent book, Suicide in Modern Catholic Literature. Lockerd examines how 20th-century Catholic writers challenged the rising culture of death through their portrayals of suicide. For instance, J.R.R. Tolkien affirms the value of life by depicting Denethor’s suicide as an act of despair and a betrayal of duty. Ehrett concludes by offering the classical Christian view of reality as essentially good. This inherent goodness, he says, can be “glimpsed everywhere around us.” As he suggests, literature like that discussed by Lockerd reminds us that endurance and hope are possible, even amid darkness. Read the rest of Ehrett’s review here. CompendiumEvery article we feature here is available to read for free. Articles from paywalled publications are available through gift links.
Upcoming ISI Events:If you enjoy what you’re reading here, we invite you to engage with ISI at one of our upcoming in-person events.
Visit our events page on our website to see all upcoming events. This week, from ISI’s Digital Media:In the latest episode of Project Cosmos, host Johnny Burtka is joined by Ross Douthat, Aaron M. Renn, Michael Miller, Matthew Walther, and Frank Hanna for a profound roundtable on one of the most urgent questions of our time: What does it mean to be a techno-optimist? Can technology serve the common good, or is it leading us toward dystopia? View all Project Cosmos episodes here. Subscribe to our YouTube channel for more content like this. This week, from the Collegiate Network:ISI’s Collegiate Network supports over 80 student-run publications across the country, empowering students to run independent college newspapers, magazines, and journals that report on important issues ignored by the mainstream media.
Visit our Student Journalism section to read more from the Collegiate Network. Rewriting ReaganAlthough nearly four decades have passed since Ronald Reagan’s presidency ended, the conservative movement still holds his memory closely. Each camp of conservatism today claims Reagan as its own, insisting that the Gipper embodied its ideals. But what did the Great Communicator himself actually believe? In this week’s piece from Modern Age, Nicholas Mosvick reviews Craig Shirley’s 2024 book: The Search for Reagan: The Appealing Intellectual Conservatism of Ronald Reagan. Shirley highlights different episodes from Reagan’s career to define his distinctive brand of conservatism—one he concludes is classically liberal and “Lockean” in spirit. To support this interpretation, Shirley cites Reagan’s nomination of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, his creation of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, and his opposition to a California proposition that would have barred homosexuals from teaching in public schools. Yet Mosvick claims Shirley overlooks Reagan’s social conservatism. Mosvick offers point-by-point refutations of several of Shirley’s key claims, contending that Reagan’s political philosophy cannot be reduced to Lockean liberalism alone. Which vision of Reagan’s legacy do you think is most accurate? Read the rest of Mosvick’s review here on the Modern Age website. Modern Age is ISI’s flagship publication. Visit modernagejournal.com and subscribe for a free daily newsletter. “The mystery of human existence lies not in just staying alive, but in finding something to live for.” – Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov Celebrate America’s semiquincentennial with ISI and help shape the next 250 years of our country. Your support of the America 500 Education Fund will help ISI reach, teach, and launch the next generation of conservative leaders. Visit isi.org/america500 to learn more. |