As the government fails to protect workers, workers are stepping up.Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here to get The Daily Prospect Monday through Friday. [link removed]
[link removed]
**NOVEMBER 6, 2025**
Click to read this email in your browser. [link removed]
The number of workers bound by noncompete clauses is staggering, with some estimates putting the number at 60 million. Ric Davidson, a worker in Texas, is in forced unemployment because of such a contract. With time on his hands and an overwhelming sense of injustice, he’s decided to fight back [link removed], not just for himself but for the millions of others in the same position. In a just world, Davidson should be planning for retirement in a few years. Instead, he told me he’s going to keep fighting noncompetes until they’re gone, whether it benefits him or not. The project is bigger than him now.
**–Whitney Curry Wimbish, staff writer**
[link removed]
Jertography/iStock
Texan Takes On Corporate Abuse as Trump’s FTC Abandons Workers [link removed]
The Biden administration’s FTC under Lina Khan banned the clauses nationwide in 2024. But corporate interests immediately attacked, and the ban is now in limbo. Meanwhile, noncompetes have proliferated.
Ric Davidson is one of the millions of workers they are harming, which is the spark that made him step up.
“I’m 62 years old with rheumatoid arthritis,” Davidson said in an interview with the
**Prospect**. The contract stripped him of all power. “I had to either accept it, ignore it, or find another way to deal with it, which is why we’re here today.”
He’d like to tell his whole story, but the conditions of the noncompete agreement he’s currently bound by are stiflingly strict. He can’t even say what his job was or the company he worked for.
Davidson signed a noncompete contract when he started working at his job, a condition of employment that wasn’t optional. “It was sign or no job,” he told me. For 20 years, he worked there, not thinking much about the clause. But this year, the company laid him off along with others, “and all of a sudden my career came to a complete halt.” The company decided to enforce the noncompete clause Davidson had signed, forbidding him from accepting another job in the same line of work anywhere in the U.S. or Canada for 18 months.
While the primary objective of noncompete agreements is to depress wages by robbing workers of choices that would bid up their labor, in instances like Davidson’s, who was laid off through no fault of his own, the primary benefit the company gains by enforcing the noncompete is not financial, but ideological. Noncompete clauses are ostensibly meant to keep someone from taking their skills elsewhere, but that doesn’t apply when a worker is laid off.
Continue reading this story [link removed]
prospect.org/donate
****ON OUR SITE****
Facing Trump’s authoritarian attack on America’s democracy, Chuck Schumer is simply incapable of mounting a determined resistance [link removed].
On Tuesday, the soaring cost of power [link removed] was a key factor in several races. Democrats have a plan that can match their economic populist rhetoric.
[link removed]
Read more about the [link removed]
IDEAS, POLITICS, and POWER [link removed]
that shape the world around us at [link removed]
prospect.org [link removed]
Copyright (c) 2025 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.**The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States**
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for our service.
To opt out of American Prospect membership, donation or advertising messaging, click here [link removed].
To manage your newsletter preferences, click here [link removed].
To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters, click here [link removed].
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
Sent to:
[email protected]
Unsubscribe [link removed]
The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States
