Will the Court continue acting as Trump’s personal enabler, or will it finally uphold the law?
John,
Today, the Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in Learning Resources v. Trump — a case that’s about far more than tariffs or trade law.
Don’t be fooled: this isn’t just about trade. This is a constitutional stress test. Will the Court continue acting as Trump’s personal enabler, or will it finally uphold the law?
Trump wants the Court to give him raw, unprecedented authority to rewrite trade law, punish industries, and manipulate the economy for personal gain. Every lower court that has reviewed his tariffs has ruled them unlawful. Yet the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has repeatedly deferred to Trump’s demands, shielding him from accountability and undermining the Constitution.
This isn’t standard “conservative majority rule.” This is different. This is Trump trying to expand his power beyond the law, turning the presidency into a tool for his own ambition. And the Court’s history under Chief Justice Roberts shows they’ve been willing to comply — time and again — weakening every guardrail on executive authority.
Trump has made his expectations clear: he wants a Court that “behaves” — one that continues dismantling every remaining check on his power. If the Court rules in his favor, it will unleash a dangerous precedent: unchecked presidential power over our economy, our laws, and our democracy itself.
Demand Justice is confronting this unprecedented overreach head-on, demanding accountability from a Court that fails its duty, and fighting relentlessly to reform a broken Supreme Court. We will not let them hand a president the power to bend our democracy to his will.
But we need your support to fuel this fight, John. Chip in $5 today to fight back against unchecked executive power before Trump and the Court rewrite the rules for good.
Donate $5 ››
If we don’t act now, the Court could give Trump the power to reshape America on a whim — and we can’t let that happen.
Demand Justice PAC
