For years, the Department of Defense — one of the most important, scrutinized and reported-on departments in our government — has been covered extensively by reporters from inside the Pentagon. This included journalists from some of the most respected and accomplished news outlets in the business, such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, NBC, CBS, ABC, and CNN, just to name a few. In fact, CBS’s Eleanor Watson noted, “During D-Day, CBS News radio correspondent Joseph F. McCaffrey reported live from the Pentagon about the strategy and General Dwight D. Eisenhower's background.”
CBS, like many of the top journalism outlets, has reported from inside the Department of Defense headquarters for more than 60 years.
But those outlets are no longer in the Pentagon after refusing to sign a new press policy that prohibits journalists from accessing or soliciting information that the Defense Department doesn’t make available to them, including even unclassified information.
It’s troubling which news outlets are no longer at the Pentagon.
Just as troubling is which outlets and so-called “journalists” are.
In a statement on Wednesday, Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said more than 60 journalists have agreed to the new rules. He wrote that they represent “a broad spectrum of new media outlets and independent journalists.”
That’s one way to put it. Another, more accurate, way to put it is the way the Post’s Drew Harwell did. He tweeted:
All right-wing bloggers and influencers who
- agreed to the press restrictions refused by established reporters
- are known for soft-touch treatment of the Trump administration
- will now get special access to the "Department of War"
According to the Post’s Harwell and Scott Nover, the outlets now supposedly doing the digging and working the halls inside the Pentagon include Tim Pool’s Timcast, the Gateway Pundit, the Post Millennial, Human Events, the National Pulse, Turning Point USA and a Substack newsletter called Washington Reporter. Then there’s the very pro-Trump One America News, the Federalist and the Epoch Times. It also includes Lindell TV — as in Mike Lindell, the MyPillow guy and ardent supporter of President Donald Trump. And, the Pentagon said, there are a bunch of "independent journalists.” Although none were mentioned by name, it’s a good guess to say that the “independent journalists” are certainly big on “independent” but not so big on “journalists.”
All are clearly OK with the Pentagon’s press restrictions. That alone should make anyone question their journalistic chops. Meanwhile, most of them have proven to be strong supporters of Trump, his administration and the entire MAGA movement.
The Washington Reporter, the newsletter that claims to be a legitimate outfit, wrote in an editorial on Wednesday that the Pentagon’s new press policy is “common sense and the media freakout is another example of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Our only concern is that the Department of War has waited until October to implement these new changes.
We support these guidelines as sound policy. We have signed them. And we are grateful for Secretary Pete Hegseth’s leadership and his remarkable track record of success.”
At one point, the editorial tried to sound serious by saying, “Let us be clear: we are not capitulating. Our reporting will remain as tough and objective as ever.”
They then showed that “objective” reporting by calling Hegseth’s tenure as Defense Secretary “nothing short of transformative,” adding, “every American should be profoundly thankful for the Department of War’s steady hand under Hegseth.”
The editorial then goes on to take shots at The Washington Post and other “left-wing hacks,” as well as airing other so-called “objective” complaints. They actually wrote this sentence: “At the end of the day, we are comfortable signing these policies in part because of who is opposed to them.”
Look, I had never heard of this newsletter until Wednesday, so it’s not as if what it says truly matters in the grand scheme of things. However, what does matter is how seriously the Defense Department takes such places. It called them the “new generation” of the Pentagon press corps.
Then there’s Pool, the right-wing influencer and podcaster. About Pool, the Post wrote, “Pool, a popular YouTuber, previously worked for a group called Tenet Media that the Justice Department said in an indictment was operated by Russian government-funded RT.”
Pool gave his reason for signing the Pentagon’s news policy in a statement, saying, “Our access is mostly for general inquiries and interviews. Should a story, for some reason, end up in our laps that may put us at odds with the Pentagon’s press policy, we will always prioritize the public’s right to know and transparency. However, given that we are not investigative reporters, we don’t expect to find ourselves in these circumstances.”
Oh, and there’s this nugget as reported on by The Washington Post: “Out of the signing outlets only OAN regularly reported from the Pentagon.”
That should tell you everything you need to know about this new Pentagon press corps.
Jared Szuba — the Pentagon correspondent for Al-Monitor, a news site based in Washington that reports on the Middle East — said in a tweet:
The US gov’t is attempting to redefine journalism. This appears to be the experiment:
- Expel Pentagon resident press by imposing policies professional journalists can’t ethically agree to
- Replace with pro-Trump activists, podcasters
- Announce new “press corps” in unison