Bost first challenged the law in May 2022, assisted by the
conservative legal organization Judicial Watch, contending ballots should
be counted on Election Day and that post-election counting threatened to
dilute his margin of victory and required him to spend money on ballot
watchers for the extended time period, causing him reputational and
financial injury.
|
|
Because no one is above
the law! |
Oct 20, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
Today's Top Stories
|
|
|
|
|
Judicial Watch Sues CIA for Jeffrey Epstein
Records
Judicial Watch announced today
that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for records involving any role Jeffrey
Epstein might have played in connection with the agency, his business
dealings, travel, victim or witness information, and records concerning his
death (Judicial Watch Inc. v. Central Intelligence Agency (No.
1:25-cv-03618)).
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Kavanaugh
Blasts Illinois For Flip-Flopping On Candidate Standing In Election
Litigation
The moment
occurred during oral arguments for Bost v. Illinois State Board of
Elections, which centers around a 2022 challenge brought by Rep. Mike Bost,
R-Ill., and other Republicans against a state law allowing ballots to be
counted up to two weeks after Election Day. Dismissed by the lower courts
over alleged “lack of standing,” the plaintiffs have asked the justices
to address the “sole question” of whether they, “as federal
candidates, have pleaded sufficient factual allegations to show Article III
standing to challenge state time, place, and manner regulations concerning
their federal elections.”
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Keep our investigators on the job uncovering the truth:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|