Or is it Trump capitalism? Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here to get The Daily Prospect Monday through Friday. [link removed]

[link removed]

**OCTOBER 20, 2025**

Click to read this email in your browser. [link removed]

I’ve come to think that ideology has absolutely no impact on Donald Trump’s presidency; its three North Stars are racism, vengeance, and monarchial absolutism [link removed]. In the ideology-shmideology category, last week Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that the administration would continue to increase its direction of, up to and including taking ownership stakes in, a range of industries, including pharmaceuticals and shipbuilding. One year ago, Bessent savaged Biden for his far less radical industrial policies, but hey—that was then. 

**–Harold Meyerson, editor at large**

[link removed]

ALEX BRANDON/AP PHOTO

More State (or Is It Just Trump?) Capitalism! [link removed]

Last year, financier Scott Bessent went before the Manhattan Institute to excoriate [link removed] the Biden administration for its revival of industrial policy. “History teaches us that prioritizing free enterprise and limiting government’s role in the economy are key to raising living standards,” he said. Nonetheless, he continued, “the Biden administration chose to put central planning at the heart of its economic agenda,” offering tax breaks to companies investing in sectors and projects that the administration considered crucial to the nation’s future, such as promoting green energy and jump-starting domestic production of critically important products made almost entirely in China. By injecting the state in what should be left to the market, Bessent concluded, “economic calamity was the predictable result.”

That, as the saying has it, was then.

Last Wednesday, Bessent, now Donald Trump’s Treasury secretary, said the government would be expanding its actual investments in companies in economic sectors that it considers critical to the nation’s future. Where Biden merely sought to boost the private semiconductor industry through grants and favorable tax policies, Trump has had the government take an ownership stake in Intel. Biden certainly backed trade policies to boost the domestic steel industry, but Trump has had the government take a “golden share” (that is, become the chief decision-maker) in U.S. Steel. Under Trump, the government has also become a major shareholder in the nation’s major rare earths mining company. On Wednesday, Bessent said [link removed] the government would be adding to such acquisitions by intervening in five to seven other key industries, including pharmaceuticals, shipbuilding, and arms production.

All these interventions, Bessent said, were, of course, a response to China’s domination of these industries, and its concomitant power to withhold their products from the United States. By recently blocking the export of its rare earth minerals to the U.S., China has made clear it has the power to cripple any number of crucial industries that need those minerals for the batteries that power their products.

“When you are facing a nonmarket economy like China, then you have to exercise industrial policies,” Bessent averred [link removed], overlooking the fact that that was the raison d’être for most of Biden’s industrial policies, too.

This form of state capitalism—where the government is enmeshed, in one way or another, in leading companies in key industries—is common in Europe, but has long been outside the pale of American capitalism. Here, we have long relied on private markets, and the myth of private markets, to power the nation’s economy. Even as iconic private companies have generally received all manner of governmental assistance—e.g., our first national corporations, the railroads, which received immense land grants from the government, in return for which they had to fork over only enough to buy occasional congresses and state legislatures—the ownership of those companies always stayed in private hands.

Continue reading this story [link removed]

We're midway through our fall fundraising campaign, and we’re so grateful for the support from our community of readers—

**thank you**. But we still need your help to reach our goal. Each donation goes directly to funding reporting and analysis from our team of reporters and editors.

If you understand the need for our reporting at this critical moment in politics, please consider contributing. Independent journalism is one of the strongest defenses against authoritarianism, and your support keeps it alive. Every gift directly helps us continue the work that our democracy depends on.

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM [link removed]

prospect.org/donate

**ON OUR SITE**

Senior Editor

**Gabrielle Gurley** has an eye on the ever-evolving Maine Senate race [link removed].

45,000 workers at a health care giant Kaiser went on strike for five days, the largest labor action of the year [link removed].

[link removed]

Read more about the [link removed]

IDEAS, POLITICS, and POWER [link removed]

that shape the world around us at [link removed]

prospect.org [link removed]

[link removed]

**Support**

**The American Prospect**

We're a small, non-profit newsroom. Our independent reporting is supported by readers like you.

YOUR TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM prospect.org/donate

Copyright (c) 2025 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.**The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States**
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for our service.
To opt out of American Prospect membership, donation or advertising messaging, click here [link removed].
To manage your newsletter preferences, click here [link removed].
To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters, click here [link removed].

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

Sent to: [email protected]

Unsubscribe [link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States