A Solution that Didn't Stick
It’s been years since I last used a PFAS-coated nonstick pan. I gave them up after reading one too many reports about the serious health impacts of these synthetic chemicals that are widely used in consumer products that resist oil, stains, and water. Honestly, I’ve never looked back; I’ve been more than satisfied with my cast iron alternatives, which are nonstick in their own right. Needless to say, I was sorely disappointed earlier this week when Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed legislation that would have helped protect cookware users across California. SB 682, which the state legislature passed in September, was set to ban “intentionally added” PFAS from cookware, as well as from food packaging, dental floss, children’s products, cleaning products, and ski wax. In doing so, it would have reduced direct product-related exposure to these “forever chemicals” that do not break down naturally, as well as manufacturing-related PFAS pollution that contaminates our shared water, soil, and air. Big Cookware wasn’t having it. The industry lobbied hard against the bill, claiming concern over consumer choice and affordability. Several high-profile chefs joined the fray, pointing, in all seriousness, to things like the difficulty of cooking omelets and crepes in “regular” pans. In the end, the industry won. The defeat stings. A PFAS cookware ban seems like such low-hanging fruit. In a world where many solutions are complicated, this one offered a simple way to reduce the flow of harmful chemicals into our bodies and the environment. It also comes at a time when we’re seeing rising rates of cancer among young people, which research increasingly suggests could be related to exposure to environmental pollutants. Add to that the sheer pettiness of some of the industry arguments — ahem, omelets — and it’s hard not to feel let down. But I haven’t given up all hope. Several other states, including Minnesota, Colorado, and Vermont, have already banned PFAS in cookware. Several more are currently considering bans. Once enough of our elected leaders stand up against the use of these toxic chemicals, the industry will have no choice but to meet the market where it’s headed. I just wish California could have helped get us there sooner.
|
