How the Far-Right Plans to Rig Democracy Through the Supreme CourtMarc Elias & Lauren Groh-Wargo Break Down the Far-Right Attack on Voting Rights
The Voting Rights Act is on the Line Last night, we hosted a live conversation with Marc Elias and Fair Fight CEO Lauren Groh-Wargo about the Supreme Court’s re-hearing of Louisiana v. Callais and what it could mean for the future of our democracy. The discussion unpacked why the Supreme Court re-heard the case, the risk to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, and how these attacks fit into a larger plot by the far-right to lock in one-party rule. The Case, ExplainedOn Wednesday, October 15, the Supreme Court re-heard arguments in Louisiana v. Callais, a case that could decide whether Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act remains constitutional. That part of the law has protected voters of color for six decades and ensured they can elect candidates of their choice. Here’s what’s happening:
Why It MattersMarc Elias explained that the last time the Supreme Court did something like this was in 2009 with the controversial Citizens United decision. That ruling unleashed unlimited corporate money in politics. This time, the risk is the Voting Rights Act itself. Lauren Groh-Wargo also broke down the stakes, explaining how the far-right’s plot to dismantle the Voting Rights Act is about disempowering Black voters in the South to create lasting one-party rule. She laid out their “three-vector” strategy:
Republicans believe combining these could flip up to 42 congressional seats and cement their control of Congress. What Comes NextMarc warned that the Court could issue its ruling as early as January 2026, potentially giving states time to redraw maps before the midterms. Louisiana already has a special redistricting session set for late October, with “trigger maps” ready to go if the ruling comes down. Lauren noted that the impact will extend far beyond Louisiana. Every level of representation could be affected, from Congress, to county commissions and school boards. Fair Fight and its partners are already organizing across the region – from new special elections in Mississippi to upcoming fights in Georgia, the South will be the front line of this battle. The Bigger PictureThis conversation widened to the broader authoritarian strategy. Trump’s allies are testing how far they can go, from deploying troops into majority-Black cities to using “national emergency” powers to interfere in elections. Lauren explained how this fits into Project 2025, a ten-point Republican plan to reshape how Americans vote. It includes: Proof-of-citizenship requirements for registration
Jump to Key Moments 0:20 — Introduction to topics and presentation of the threats to democracy across courts and states 2:29 — Marc explains how Louisiana v. Callais became a direct test of the Voting Rights Act 5:35 — The Citizens United comparison and what that means for timing 7:26 — Why the Court may rule early to affect the 2026 midterms 14:08 — The return of Jim Crow-style representation in the South 15:48 — Lauren details the GOP’s “three-vector” power strategy 19:18 — Why litigation still matters and how Fair Fight uses it 30:15 — Marc discusses Trump’s potential use of the military to suppress voters 39:50 — Lauren outlines Project 2025 and the ten-point plan to control elections 44:10 — What comes next and how to fight back Stay ConnectedFor more conversations like this, subscribe to Rights & Insights, where we break down the far-right’s coordinated attacks on democracy and share how to fight back. Follow Fair Fight for updates, analysis, and ways to take action ahead of the 2026 midterms. Paid for by Fair Fight, www.fairfight.com, not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee. |