|
 |
Thank you for being a free subscriber.. Don’t lose access. Please upgrade your subscription to Lincoln Square today with this limited-time offer.
Join us on the frontline in the battle for our rights and freedoms under the law. It's our duty as Americans to defend democracy. Together.
 |
| ||
The Voting Rights Act Is on Life Support. Will SCOTUS Pull the Plug?| LIVE with Jeff Timmer & David Pepper
The Supreme Court has taken up Louisiana gerrymandering case that could take us back to Jim Crow.
|
| |||||||||||||||
The Supreme Court is poised to erase what’s left of the Voting Rights Act’s power to stop racial gerrymandering.
David compared the Court’s rightward march to “the same rollback that took Reconstruction to Jim Crow.”
Jeff said this ruling would “turn back the clock to the pre-1964 South,” erasing generations of civil rights gains.
Both warned that the only response left is civic power — showing up, organizing, and refusing to be silenced.
David Pepper described the Louisiana case before the Supreme Court as the moment democracy itself stands trial. The challenge, he said, could make it impossible to fix racially discriminatory maps — ending even the illusion of equal representation. “If they win on this,” he warned, “it means there’s no way to remedy discrimination.” The justices aren’t interpreting the Constitution; they’re amputating the very tools meant to enforce it. What’s at stake isn’t technical — it’s existential.
Jeff saw it as history repeating itself with new robes and the same intent. “The Civil War didn’t really end until 1964,” he said, “and they’re trying to start it again through redistricting.” He remembered when Section 2 protections were sacred to both parties, a shared commitment not to fracture Black political power. Watching the Court dismantle that principle feels like witnessing the unmaking of the modern republic. The map lines are just the surface; the deeper redrawing is of the country’s moral boundaries.
The deeper crisis is institutional rot dressed up as legal reasoning. When the Court uses its authority to entrench minority rule, it doesn’t just distort democracy — it replaces it. What follows isn’t debate, it’s design: Laws built to contain rather than represent, rights contingent on geography instead of citizenship. The language of “originalism” becomes camouflage for power, each decision narrowing who counts and who doesn’t.
Yet, the math still favors the many. Authoritarian movements survive by convincing the majority that resistance is futile — but it isn’t. Votes still outnumber decrees, communities still outlast the systems that try to silence them. The power that built the Voting Rights Act hasn’t vanished; it’s waiting to be used again, louder, smarter, and everywhere at once.
Tune in to the full conversation with Jeff Timmer and David Pepper.
 | A guest post by
|
 | A guest post by
|
You’re currently a free subscriber to Lincoln Square Media. For full access to our content, our Lincoln Loyal community, and to help us amplify the facts about the assault on our rights and freedoms, please consider upgrading your subscription today with this limited-time offer:
Not ready to subscribe? Make a one-time donation of $10 or more to support our work amplifying the facts on social media, targeted to voters in red states and districts that we can help flip. Every $10 reaches 1000 Americans. The Truth needs a voice. Your donation will help us amplify it.
Want to help amplify this post? Please leave a comment and tell us what you think.
| ||||||||||
