A case heard Wednesday will go a long way to determining whether Republicans can gerrymander their way to a near-permanent House majority.Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here to get The Daily Prospect Monday through Friday. [link removed]

[link removed]

**OCTOBER 16, 2025**

Click to read this email in your browser. [link removed]

It turned out that everyone looking at whether Donald Trump was going to rig maps to ensure House control in the 2026 midterms was looking in the wrong place. The state tour to gerrymander red states and knock out Democratic representatives hasn't yielded much so far. But a Supreme Court case heard yesterday has the potential to be much farther-reaching, and lock in Republican dominance for a long time. That's the real threat [link removed] to election integrity.

**– David Dayen, executive editor**

[link removed]

CHIP SOMODEVILLA/PICTURE-ALLIANCE/DPA/AP IMAGES

The 2026 Election Is Being Decided at the Supreme Court [link removed]

The Trump gerrymandering tour has not been going well. So far, it has succeeded in Texas, where new districts could dislodge up to five Democrats, and Missouri, where lawmakers voted to muscle out Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) by splitting up Kansas City. But Texas is under a legal challenge and, more importantly, still gives Democrats opportunities [link removed] to hold onto at least two of the five seats, while the Missouri map could get challenged [link removed] by referendum (surprisingly, without much help from national Democrats) and delayed into 2028. The Missouri Attorney General is now suing the signature gatherers [link removed], amazingly claiming that they are trying to silence the will of the politicians.

Meanwhile, California’s Election Rigging Response Act, which would draw new maps to likely offset losses in Texas with gains for Democrats, looks like it will sail to an initiative victory on November 4. Utah was forced by a judge to redraw its Congressional maps, giving one or maybe two Democrats a chance to win there. So accounting for what’s actually in place today, the outcome of the redistricting wars could be Democrats +1 or maybe even more.

Several other states are considering map changes; the fight is not over. But we don’t really have to look to Indianapolis or Tallahassee or Topeka or Columbus or anywhere else to figure out who will gain an advantage. You just have to look to One First Street, NE in Washington, D.C., the home of the Supreme Court.

Oral arguments were heard on Wednesday in a pair of consolidated cases from Louisiana (known by the primary case involved,

**Louisiana v. Callais**) that will determine the future of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, really the only section that remains operative. The Court heard

**Callais** last term, but took the unusual step of rehearing it at the beginning of their new session, and the way oral arguments trended on Wednesday, observers are fairly convinced that Section 2 will be severely damaged, if not dismantled, in a final ruling.

What that means is that states could draw racially discriminatory maps, robbing minority voters of the fair chance to elect representatives. In practical terms, it means that a host of “minority opportunity” districts in the South will be obliterated. According to an analysis from Fair Fight Action and Black Voters Matter [link removed], overturning Section 2 could result in a direct shift of 19 districts to Republicans.

That goes well beyond the smaller handful of seats that could change hands as Trump tries to intimidate state legislators into rigging maps. If it were only up to Trump, Republicans would get a minimal advantage next year. But it’s John Roberts’s Supreme Court that has the real power to put the country on the road to rotten boroughs [link removed] and locked-in partisan dominance.

Continue reading this story [link removed]

We're midway through our fall fundraising campaign, and we’re so grateful for the support from our community of readers—

**thank you**. But we still need your help to reach our goal. Each donation goes directly to funding reporting and analysis from our team of reporters and editors.

If you understand the need for our reporting at this critical moment in politics, please consider contributing. Independent journalism is one of the strongest defenses against authoritarianism, and your support keeps it alive. Every gift directly helps us continue the work that our democracy depends on.

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM [link removed]

[link removed]

**ON OUR SITE**

**Chris Lewis** of the Revolving Door Project breaks down exactly how much damage [link removed] Trump's done to the Department of Education.

U.S. soybean exports are collapsing.

**Naomi Bethune** explains the effects [link removed] we'll see for our farm economy.

[link removed]

Read more about the [link removed]

IDEAS, POLITICS, and POWER [link removed]

that shape the world around us at [link removed]

prospect.org [link removed]

[link removed]

**Support**

**The American Prospect**

We're a small, non-profit newsroom. Our independent reporting is supported by readers like you.

YOUR TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM prospect.org/donate

Copyright (c) 2025 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.**The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States**
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for our service.
To opt out of American Prospect membership, donation or advertising messaging, click here [link removed].
To manage your newsletter preferences, click here [link removed].
To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters, click here [link removed].

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

Sent to: [email protected]

Unsubscribe [link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States