<[link removed]>Dear Friend,

Sometimes in our campaign to abolish nuclear weapons it can feel as if the odds are stacked against us. Those who want to keep nuclear weapons are powerful, with funds to spare to promote their agenda and to seek to discredit research that contradicts their objectives. In May, the Guardian revealed <[link removed]> that France spent €90,000 to discredit peer-reviewed scientific evidence that they consistently underestimated the humanitarian impact of French nuclear detonations. The United Kingdom Ministry of Defense has a Nuclear Deterrence Fund <[link removed]> of at least £3.3 million as a “pilot programme” to support research on nuclear deterrence "aligned with the priorities" of the UK government. And these are just a few examples that we know about.

We don’t see millions being spent to fund research in support of disarmament. But that doesn’t mean that we can’t make a difference with what we do have. ICAN’s Critical Nuclear Weapons Scholarship <[link removed]> has led to field work and the publication of numerous peer-reviewed articles on issues the nuclear-armed states would hope would never see the light of day. Scholars have examined nuclear disarmament activism and art <[link removed]>in the Pacific, a forgotten nuclear weapons factory <[link removed]> in the UK and the women-led movement against it, the representation and valuing of nuclear weapons <[link removed]> in video games and nuclear politics in Israel and Palestine <[link removed]>.

Our annual report on nuclear weapons spending <[link removed]> draws attention to the vast sums being squandered on weapons of mass destruction - and is cited across mainstream media headlines <[link removed]> and by political leaders <[link removed]> at the United Nations.

ICAN has helped to build a community of nuclear disarmament researchers, including through support for disarmament research conferences at the University of Pretoria <[link removed]> and the University of Bradford <[link removed]> and on the sidelines of meetings of states parties of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. We engage actively to support UN-convened panels of scientific researchers on nuclear disarmament and nuclear impacts, including the TPNW Scientific Advisory Group and its network of experts and the new UN Scientific Panel on the Effects of Nuclear War.

More importantly, we help research have an impact, sharing key findings for our partners to use in their advocacy and connecting researchers with policy makers. Research fuels public communications <[link removed]> and media <[link removed]>, editorials <[link removed]> and presentations to policy makers <[link removed]>.  

We don’t have the millions that nuclear-armed states - and their allies - can use to influence the debate, but we do have a diverse and committed community contributing their voices and research to expand the debate, including to demonstrate the devastating consequences of nuclear weapons and the feasibility of nuclear disarmament.

As Margaret Mead famously said: "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has".

Onwards, 

Alicia

<[link removed]> <[link removed]>Support our work <[link removed]> <[link removed]> <[link removed]> <[link removed]> <[link removed]> <[link removed]>ICAN is the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
  Place de Cornavin 2, Geneve 1201, Switzerland
This email was sent to [email protected] <> · Unsubscribe <[link removed]>