Today, Freedom Network USA (FNUSA) filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration, challenging executive orders that severely restrict and chill Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives and jeopardize the future of its work to protect and advocate for human trafficking survivors. FNUSA is represented by a team of civil rights lawyers from the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and pro-bono counsel Crowell & Moring LLP. The lawsuit, filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division, asks the court for a preliminary and permanent injunction to block the enforcement of the executive orders as unlawful and unconstitutional.
FNUSA is the nation’s largest survivor and advocate-led anti-trafficking coalition, and through its programs provides connections to housing resources, legal and social service support, and second chances for survivors of human trafficking. The organization and its coalition serve over 4,000 survivors annually and provide technical assistance to more than 1,000 stakeholders from social service providers to community organizers.
Seventy percent of FNUSA’s funding comes from the Department of Justice through grants authorized by Congress in the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. President Trump’s anti-DEI executive orders call for the termination of “equity-related” federal grants and contracts. The Department of Justice has subsequently censored Freedom Network USA from using everyday terms like “gender,” “racial” and “accessibility,” in its federally funded work which are central to FNUSA’s mission. As an organization that serves those who are most at risk of confronting barriers due to their trafficking—especially Black and Brown, immigrant, and LGBTQ+ survivors—the censorship and restrictions caused by the executive orders threaten the core of its work and its ability to effectuate the promise of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.
Under these circumstances, FNUSA faces censorship under the pressure to keep its grant or an outright termination of its grant in addition to exposure to liability under the False Claims Act. Both scenarios severely impede the organization’s ability to fulfill its mission.
|