The world let out a sigh of relief following the successful summit
between President Trump and President Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, on
August 15, 2025. While the momentum from that summit has not
completely dissipated, it seems to be headed in that direction. The
relentless and psychotic drive of European, NATO, and other elites to
escalate towards full-on war with a nuclear-armed Russia is now
putting the world a few inches away from an irreversible catastrophe—a
global nuclear war that would destroy all life on Earth.
Pressure is being brought upon the Trump Administration to sell
Tomahawk missiles to Europe for use in Ukraine, which are capable of
carrying nuclear warheads and can be launched up to a range 1,550
miles, more than enough to hit targets deep within Russian territory,
a clear red-line which would make the U.S. and NATO direct
participants in the war. Former UN weapons inspector and U.S. marine
Scott Ritter had reminded readers in his Substack article, “The
Missiles of October,” that Trump had clearly outlined his opposition
to the Biden Administration's policy of allowing Ukraine to use the
U.S.-provided ATACMS missiles to strike targets deep inside Russia.
Trump had said then, in December 2024, “ “I disagree very vehemently
with sending missiles hundreds of miles into Russia. Why are we doing
that? We’re just escalating this war and making it worse. That should
not have been allowed to be done. Now they’re doing not only missiles,
but they’re doing other types of weapons. And I think that’s a very
big mistake, a very big mistake.”
Ritter and others are now mobilizing the U.S. Congress to act
immediately to ban the shipment of such weapons to Ukraine, along with
intelligence support in targeting the missiles. We know, given the
statements of former military experts within the U.S. who have voiced
opposition to the current war hysteria which has taken over
Washington, that the long-range missiles could not be operated except
with the intelligence and reconnaissance data provided by the U.S. to
Ukrainian operators.
In Southwest Asia, another theater of war, there is cautious, yet
renewed hope for a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas,
following an initial agreement being reached Sharm el Sheikh, Egypt,
for the first phase of the agreement to release hostages on both sides
of the conflict. Initial statements from the teams involved indicate
that all of the Israeli hostages, and roughly 2,000 Palestinian
prisoners who were seized since October 7, 2023, are to be released;
Israeli troops are to withdraw to agreed-upon lines; and the flow of
aid is to resume at levels consistent with the January 2025
agreement.
It’s our obligation, as actors, not spectators, to make sure the
geopolitical confrontation with Russia, China, and other nations is
ended, and replaced with win-win agreements between sovereign
nation-states, not vassals of Wall Street, for economic development.
In a statement written by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, and distributed across
several peace rallies in Germany, on the anniversary of the fall of
the Berlin Wall, she makes clear, “For the first time in human
history, we are all in the same boat: We will either go down together,
or jointly open a new more humane chapter in universal history. That
is why we must stand up against the war hysteria that is being whipped
up, with hundreds of thousands of people on the streets—as in the
early 1980s. But that is not enough. We must overcome the geopolitical
causes of war and overcome, together with the Global South, the great
challenges facing humanity—poverty and underdevelopment. Only by
helping the countries of the Global South to develop their economic
potential will we be able to resolve the refugee crisis in a humane
way.”
Only through that adopted policy of nations of the world, can we
address the roots of all crises.
|