View this post on the web at [link removed]

On October 15th, the Supreme Court will rehear [ [link removed] ] Louisiana v. Callais [ [link removed] ] – a case that could reshape voting rights across America for generations.
The immediate question may sound technical: whether Louisiana was wrong to create a second majority-Black congressional district after a federal court found its old map violated the Voting Rights Act.
Why This Case Matters
But the bigger stakes go far beyond one state or one map.
At the center of the case is Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act [ [link removed] ] – the safeguard that protects voters of color from racially discriminatory maps. For decades, Section 2 has been the backbone of voting rights law, requiring states to fix discriminatory election systems so that minority communities have a fair chance to elect candidates of their choice.
Section 2 is a protection that was designed to end the Jim Crow practice of locking Black, Latino, Native, and Asian American voters out of power. Congress enacted it to fulfill the guarantee of the 14th and 15th Amendments of equal voting rights for minority communities.
The Supreme Court’s Question
Now the Court will confront a dangerous question: can states consider race to fix proven racial discrimination in their maps – or is fixing discrimination itself now to be considered “discrimination”?
The justices could decide that even remedies for discrimination violate the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. This radical view [ [link removed] ] distorts the Reconstruction-era Amendments into weapons to attack the very rights they were intended to protect. If the justices take that path, the consequences will extend far beyond Louisiana.
Section 2 was not created as a partisan tool – it was a safeguard for democracy itself. Its sole purpose is to ensure minority voters can fairly participate in elections and elect representatives responsive to their communities.
Just because many voters of color have often chosen Democrats does not make Section 2 partisan. What it does is enforce the promise of equal representation – a promise that has never been fully met, but one that has been essential to building a more inclusive democracy.
The Stakes for Democracy
If Section 2 is gutted, protections against discriminatory maps could nearly vanish nationwide. Courts have already given politicians a green light to gerrymander for partisan advantage. Without Section 2, state legislatures would have almost no limits.
That means congressional districts, state legislative maps, city councils, even school boards could be redrawn in ways that silence entire communities.
The risks do not stop with voting. If the Court rules that race-based remedies for discrimination are unconstitutional, that logic could ripple across other areas of civil rights law. Housing, education, and employment protections could all be destabilized by the claim that race can “never” be considered, even to address proven inequities.
What’s Next
This case is about much more than Louisiana. It is about whether communities of color will continue to have meaningful representation in American democracy. It is about whether the Voting Rights Act – one of the most important civil rights achievements in our history – will survive.
The future of fair representation is on the line. Call your members of Congress and tell them to hold the Court accountable and to pass the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act: (202) 224-3121.
The John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act would restore and strengthen protections that have been chipped away over the last decade.
Without it, millions of Americans could lose one of the last meaningful safeguards for their right to vote – and our multiracial democracy could be pushed back to a pre-1965 reality.
Stay vigilant,
Fair Fight Team
Paid for by Fair Fight Action.

Unsubscribe [link removed]?