A crucial political meeting in Paris today will force a choice between a popular wealth tax and a deepening political crisis.View this email in your browser [link removed]

[link removed]

****OCTOBER 3, 2025****

If you’re reading this, you already know: democracy depends on an informed, engaged public. Our mission at

**The American Prospect**is to cut through the noise, counter cynicism, and empower people to take action – and that only happens with readers like you.

Right now, we’re in the middle of our fall fundraising campaign, and we need your help [link removed] to reach our goal. Independent journalism is one of the strongest defenses against authoritarianism, and we need your support to keep it alive. 

This fall, we set an ambitious fundraising goal so we can expand our capacity to report on the ideas, politics, and power dynamics that shape our world – at a time when this work is needed most. Your contribution, no matter the size, directly supports our vital reporting and helps us continue fighting for the informed democracy we all depend on.

DONATE NOW [link removed]

****Kuttner on TAP****

**Taxing the rich and the survival of Emmanuel Macron**

**A crucial political meeting in Paris today will force a choice between a popular wealth tax and a deepening political crisis.**

The idea of a wealth tax on society’s richest people is suddenly in vogue, thanks to the political stalemate in France. Economist Gabriel Zucman, who divides his time between Berkeley and Paris, has proposed a wealth tax that maxes out at 2 percent, on France’s top 0.1 percent of households, just 1,800 people, whose wealth exceeds 100 billion euros, about $118 billion.

So highly concentrated is wealth in France that the tax would bring in between $15 billion and $25 billion annually, enough to substantially reduce France’s huge budget of close to 6 percent of GDP without unpopular budget cuts. More than anywhere else, France poses that stark choice.

The idea of a wealth tax has been around for a while. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have proposed something similar. What gives the Zucman tax special resonance at this moment is that three French governments have fallen in the past year over demands for cuts in popular social spending.

The idea of the tax has made the 38-year-old French economist a rock star. A recent poll shows that 86 percent of French voters support the tax, including 75 percent of voters for Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally party and 92 percent of President Macron’s supporters. The stark choice between unacceptably high deficits, cuts in popular social programs, or a tax on society’s wealthiest has given French politics a new slogan:

**Justice Fiscal!**

A further benefit of the tax is that Le Pen, supposedly the champion of France’s downtrodden, has been coy about whether she supports the tax. So the idea also has the virtue of dividing Le Pen from her supporters.

What gives the tax its political power in this moment is the extreme vulnerability of the government. Macron has relied on a succession of minority governments. He made a disastrous miscalculation in June 2024, when he called a snap parliamentary election, which left his allies with even fewer seats. The legislative election resulted in a hung parliament with the left-wing coalition New Popular Front with a plurality of 193 deputies, Macron’s Renaissance coalition in second place with 166, followed by Le Pen’s RN in third place with 142.

[link removed]

His recent prime minister, François Bayrou, was ousted overwhelmingly in a 364-194 vote on September 8, a protest against Bayrou’s austerity budget. Macron’s newest prime minister, the fourth in 12 months, Sébastien Lecornu, can survive only if he wins the support of the Socialists, who hold a crucial bloc of 64 seats. But the Socialists’ make-or-break demand is that Lecornu’s budget include the Zucman tax or something like it.

The Socialist leadership met with Lecornu today [link removed]. He offered some concessions, including some form of tax on wealth, but not the tax proposed by Zucman. And he promised that there would be a separate vote on both the Zucman tax and the proposed cuts in pensions. Whether this would be enough for the Socialists to support his budget and keep the government from falling remains to be seen.

Macron, whose own popularity ratings have been languishing, has made it clear that he opposes a wealth tax. But if negotiations between the Socialists and Lecornu collapse over the wealth tax, Macron would likely have to call new elections once again. The big winner would be Marine Le Pen, whose RN party would almost surely gain seats, making Macron dependent on Le Pen and her allies to govern at all.

The irony is that Macron has presented himself as France’s best hope to keep Le Pen from power. The next presidential election is in 2027, though it could be sooner if Macron’s repeated stumbles compel him to resign.

Macron himself is barred from running by France’s two-term limit. None of his center-right allies is well positioned. A Socialist might give Le Pen a viable challenge, especially if Macron decided to govern for the remainder of his term with the center-left. But unless Macron and Lecornu make a radical shift and back something like the Zucman tax, it appears that Macron would rather ease the path to power for his archrival Le Pen than tax the super-rich.

The U.S. has even greater extreme concentration of wealth and low effective taxation of the rich than France. Trump’s tax cuts for the wealthy combined with program cuts for everyone else have made the disparity even worse. But the sideshow around shutting down the government combined with Trump’s control of Congress has blurred the real choices. In France, they are stark. Let’s hope France leads.

**– ROBERT KUTTNER**

Follow Robert Kuttner on Bluesky [link removed]

****On the

**Prospect **website****

[link removed]

Opening Parks During Shutdown Part of Plan to Ruin Them [link removed]

The Trump administration is selling out America’s national parks. Keeping them open during the shutdown makes them dangerous, filthy, and easier to seize.

**BY WHITNEY CURRY WIMBISH** [link removed] [link removed]

[link removed]

Secret Sharers: Jews, Muslims, and this Long, Cruel War [link removed]

How the Christian West turned its loathed infidels into mutual antagonists

**BY JAMES CARROLL** [link removed] [link removed]

[link removed]

The ‘Look What You Made Me Do’ Phase of the Shutdown [link removed]

Russ Vought has no authority during the shutdown to implement DOGE 2.0 to extract political pain from Democrats. In fact, he’s admitted that outright.

**BY DAVID DAYEN** [link removed]

[link removed]

To receive this newsletter directly in your inbox, click here to subscribe [link removed]

**Click to Share This Newsletter**

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States
Copyright (c) 2025 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.

To manage your newsletter preferences, use our preference management page [link removed].

To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters, follow this link to unsubscribe [link removed].

Sent to: [email protected]

Unsubscribe [link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States