Court Rules in Favor of Historically Black Community of Freeport, Texas, to Keep Their Land in Battle with Port and Eminent Domain
A Texas appellate court has rejected an attempt by the port of Freeport to use eminent domain to seize land from a group of property owners in Freeport’s historically black community. Driven by visions of expansion, the port has attempted to acquire and destroy most of the city’s historic East End neighborhood, but, as this decision says, it “never could identify a specific public use” and “admitted that it did not have any specific plans for what will be developed,” a requirement for any use of eminent domain. The court added, “The Constitution does not condone this take now, plan later approach.”
“This a victory for the Marshalls and every other family that stood to have their land taken simply because the port thought it could," said IJ Senior Attorney Jeffrey Redfern. “If the government can use eminent domain just based on the hope it comes up with a plan in the future, no one’s property is safe.
Small Businesses Will Appeal Ruling That St. Louis Suburb Can Take Their Locations
Small business and property owners challenging Brentwood, Missouri’s labeling of their properties as blighted will appeal a court ruling blessing the designations. The Manchester Corridor in Brentwood, Missouri, is home to many thriving family-owned businesses. Many of the businesses that line Manchester Road have been serving the community for decades. But the city is threatening to use its eminent domain power to force these well-loved businesses to close shop so a private developer can make way for new businesses, all in the name of economic development.
Maine Family Sues Under State’s Innovative Right to Food Amendment to Keep Backyard Chickens
Maine is the first state in the country to recognize a “right to food.” Article I, section 25 of the Maine Constitution guarantees Mainers the right to “grow, raise, harvest, produce and consume the food of their own choosing for their own nourishment, sustenance, bodily health and well-being.” Kamiwan Oliver and her family raise chickens for their eggs and meat to lessen the burden of grocery bills on their tight family budget. After their town passed an ordinance making it impossible for the Olivers to raise enough chickens to meet the family's needs, they sued using the right to food amendment.
Beyond The Brief: Plane Seized Over Six-Pack of Budweiser
Can the government take a $95,000 plane because a passenger used it to transport a six pack of Budweiser? The Alaska Supreme Court says yes, but the U.S. Constitution says no.
We travel to YIMBYTown, the Yes-In-My-Back-Yard conference, held this year in New Haven, Connecticut. Our guests discuss recent cases and controversies related to efforts to build more homes and also do the opposite.
Your tax-deductible contribution helps IJ fight for Americans’ rights. IJ defends ordinary people who want to pursue their vision of the American Dream but find that the government is standing in their way. We stand with our clients no matter how long their cases take, and we win nearly 75% of the time.
.jpg?width=1200&upscale=true&name=MKohut_IJ-Freeport-TX-PreTrial-017-1024x681%20(1).jpg)
.png?width=1120&upscale=true&name=cws-promo%20(1).png)
