Welcome to an all-new EFFector, your regular digest on everything digital rights from the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
In our 830th issue: Vehicle-tracking police drones, mass surveillance in Mexico, and the findings from our investigation into abortion censorship on social media.
When you lose your rights online, you lose them in real life. Become an EFF member today!
Earlier this year, EFF began investigating stories of abortion-related content being taken down or suppressed on social media. Recently, we began sharing our findings. What we uncovered is an abortion censorship crisis online, one where vital health information is protected by policy but repeatedly silenced in practice.
In February, we began asking users for their stories of abortion content censorship. Since then, we've seen nearly 100 examples from a wide variety of users, including personal accounts, influencers, healthcare clinics, research organizations, and advocacy groups. Comparing the content of these posts to what the policies of these platforms (particularly those owned by Meta) allow, we found that almost none of the submissions we received violated any of the platforms’ stated policies. Most of the censored posts simply provided factual, educational information.
One Threads post, for instance, merely shared facts about the availability and storage of two FDA-approved medications. Notably, Meta itself (which owns Threads, Facebook, and Instagram) has publicly insisted that posts like these should not be censored. In a letter last year to Amnesty International, Meta's Human Rights Policy Director stated that: “Organic content (i.e., non paid content) educating users about medication abortion is allowed and does not violate our Community Standards. Additionally, providing guidance on legal access to pharmaceuticals is allowed."
Soon after the Threads post went up, however, it was taken down for supposedly violating Meta's policy against "allow[ing] people to buy, sell, or exchange drugs that require a prescription from a doctor or a pharmacist.” In the submissions we received, this was the most common reason Meta gave for removing abortion-related content.
Around a quarter of submitted stories were reports that entire accounts or pages had been disabled or taken down after sharing abortion information—primarily on Meta platforms. This troubling pattern indicates that the censorship crisis goes beyond content removal. Accounts providing crucial reproductive health information are disappearing, often without warning, cutting users off from their communities and followers entirely.
The stakes couldn't be higher. In a post-Roe landscape where access to accurate reproductive health information is more crucial than ever, Meta's enforcement system is silencing the very voices communities need most. If Meta and other platforms want to practice what they preach about free expression, they must close the gap between their stated policies and how they are applied.
We spoke with multiple Meta representatives to share these findings. Unfortunately, we were mostly left with the same concerns, but we’re continuing to push them to do better. We hope our ongoing blog post series highlighting examples of abortion content censorship will help the public and the platforms understand the breadth of this problem, who is affected, and with what consequences. Together, we can hold social media platforms accountable, demand transparency in moderation practices, and ultimately stop the censorship of this essential, sometimes life-saving information.
READ MORE…
👮 CAR-TRACKING DRONES: It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's an ALPR-enhanced police drone tracking your every move! As if license plate readers and drones weren't bad enough on their own, surveillance vendors like Flock are now selling flying police cameras that combine these two invasive technologies—and they may be coming soon to a city near you.
🎵 TIKTOK SALE: From the very beginning, EFF opposed the TikTok "ban" for violating the First Amendment, which is supposed to protect us from the government using its power to manipulate speech. Now, President Trump has reportedly approved a plan to give his allies control of the video platform in the U.S. As we write on our blog, the "ban" has only resulted in turning over TikTok to the allies of a president who seems to have no respect for the First Amendment.
🇲🇽 MASS SURVEILLANCE IN MEXICO: This summer, the Mexican government passed a package of outrageously privacy-invasive laws giving law enforcement access to troves of personal data and forcing every individual to turn over biometric information regardless of any suspicion of crime. We urge everyone to pay close attention to and support efforts to hold the Mexican government accountable for this egregious surveillance system.
📱 DIGITAL PRIVACY WIN: A federal appeals court just delivered good news for digital privacy: abandoning a phone doesn't mean you've also abandoned your privacy rights. In United States v. Hunt, the court made clear that no longer having control of a device is not the same thing as surrendering the privacy of the information it contains.
What the future will look like is being decided today. Join the movement to protect our digital rights.
Whether it’s governments trying to censor the internet, private companies exploiting our data for profit, or police using advanced technologies to track our every move, EFF is resisting the forces threatening our digital freedom.
Technology should serve all people, not just the powerful. With your support, we can take back control.
