Dear John,
History was made in Missoula last week.
For the first time ever, a federal court heard live testimony in a constitutional climate case led by young people. Over two powerful days, the youth plaintiffs in Lighthiser v. Trump stood before a judge and told their truth — about wildfire evacuations, asthma attacks, heat stroke, mental health struggles, and a government putting their lives at risk.
Inside, the young plaintiffs never wavered. Even under sharp cross-examination from attorneys representing the Trump administration, they remained unshakably clear about what’s at stake: their lives, their freedoms, and their country.
They weren’t alone. Expert witnesses — from Nobel Prize-winning scientists to economists and pediatricians — backed them with powerful evidence.
And the government? Presented zero witnesses. No facts. No experts. Just an unbelievable argument that the President has the power to do whatever he wants.
Outside the courthouse, Montanans showed up with purpose. Students, families, elders, faith leaders, and community partners gathered early each morning, holding signs, singing, and standing in solidarity. Each morning, one supporter lined the sidewalk with marigolds, creating a path of warmth and hope for the youth plaintiffs as they entered the courtroom. In the evenings, the plaintiffs and families gathered the flowers and wove them into leis — a quiet, powerful symbol of unity between Big Sky Country and Island Aloha.
Here’s what happened inside the courtroom:
For a fuller description of the hearing and all the powerful testimony, you can read our detailed blog here.
Day 1: Youth Voices Take the Stand & National Leaders Back Them Up
Joseph, 19, from California, described how extreme heat sent him to the hospital, where he fought for his life, conditions that will worsen with every additional increment of fossil fuel pollution, and how cuts to federal climate science programs forced him to abandon his Environmental Policy studies.
Jorja, 17, spoke about protecting “my Montana”, recounted a devastating flood, worsening wildfire smoke, and the emotional toll of watching her home environment deteriorate, all of which will deepen if the executive orders stand.
Avery, 20, shared how from coast to coast, wildfires in Oregon and hurricanes in Florida have caused her financial hardship and climate anxiety about where she can safely live, threats that are exacerbated by the loss of federal warning systems and national climate assessments. She also described her fear of starting a family if executive directives unleash even more fossil fuels.