From CSRxP <[email protected]>
Subject They Said It!: Lawmakers Highlight Critical Role of Competition to Lower Prescription Drug Prices in Markup to Advance Q1/Q2 Reforms
Date September 24, 2025 1:45 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
In case you missed it, the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce advanced
bipartisan legislation last week that would increase transparency in generic
drug applications. This bipartisan, market-based solution would reform the
Q1/Q2 sameness requirements from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
that Big Pharma abuses to extend exclusivity, promoting a more efficient and
streamlined generic drug approval process.









THEY SAID IT!: LAWMAKERS HIGHLIGHT CRITICAL ROLE OF COMPETITION TO LOWER
PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES IN MARKUP TO ADVANCE Q1/Q2 REFORMS

U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce Advances Bipartisan, Market-Based
Solution to Crack Down on Anti-Competitive Tactic Used by Big Pharma to Extend
Exclusivity, Keep Drug Prices High



In case you missed it, the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce advanced
<[link removed]>
bipartisan legislation last week that would increase transparency in generic
drug applications. This bipartisan, market-based solution would reform the
Q1/Q2 sameness requirements from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
that Big Pharma abuses to extend exclusivity, promoting a more efficient and
streamlined generic drug approval process. According to the nonpartisan
Congressional Budget Office (CBO), this solution would deliver more than $1
billion in savings.



During the hearing, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle highlighted the
importance of promoting competition and cracking down on anti-competitive
tactics used by large pharmaceutical companies to extend exclusivity that keeps
drug prices high.



U.S. Representative Neal Dunn (R-FL-02), Vice Chairman, U.S. House Committee
on Energy and Commerce: “This amendment adds language to the bill to increase
transparency in generic drug applications. This common-sense legislation will
allow companies working to bring lower-cost generics to market clarity from the
FDA on whether or not their drug is qualitatively and quantitatively the same
as the list of drugs. What this means is that Americans and their companies can
face less hurdles when they’re bringing a generic drug to market. In the United
States, generic drugs make up over 90 percent of filled prescriptions. These
are really common medicines. Americans use them every day. Generic medicines
are safe, effective and often far cheaper than our branded counterparts.
Increased access to these medications will save Americans money at the pharmacy
and also promote their health and well-being.”



U.S. Representative Frank Pallone (D-NJ-06), Ranking Member, U.S. House
Committee on Energy and Commerce: “We’re also considering a bill that will…
[improve] regulatory certainty while also strengthening the medical product
supply chain and enhancing patient access to lower cost medicines.
Specifically, the bill will allow for disclosure of certain information related
to drug formulations to generic drug manufacturers to bring lower-cost
medications to patients more quickly.”



U.S. Representative Doris Matsui (D-CA-07): “The legislation we’re considering
today will help bring therapies to market faster. It will prevent
pharmaceutical companies from gaming the system. It will ensure patients can
access the cutting-edge therapies that they need.”



More on Q1/Q2 Reforms



One way Big Pharma games the system to block competition from more affordable
alternatives to high-priced brand name drugs is by abusing a process known as
“Q1/Q2 sameness.” This refers to a requirement from the FDAthat
<[link removed]>
“generic drug manufacturers mimic the brand-name drug formulation for certain
formulations” so that these drugs are “Qualitatively the same, or Q1,” meaning
they contain the “same inactive ingredients,” and that they are also
“Quantitively the same, or Q2,” in that they have “essentially the same
concentration” of these ingredients.



The problem arises in the fact that brand name drug makers can assert “trade
secret protection” around many of the products generic drug makers are
attempting to copy, meaning generic drug manufacturers have to “essentially
play a protracted guessing game with FDA,” as Association for Accessible
Medicines (AAM) CEO John Murphy III put it in a June 2024column
<[link removed]>
. Murphy added, this leads to “a lot of spilled ink, wasted resources and
unnecessary red tape,” and has “delayed generic competition, and in particular
competition for critical complex products—a growing category of medicines that
have complex active ingredients, formulations, or routes of administration—that
are frequently expensive and desperately require generic competition.”



A prominent example is brand name drug maker Allergan’s dry eye drug Restasis.
According to Murphy, “[i]t took FDA nine years to approve a generic version of
Restasis because of asserted formulation trade secret claims by the brand-name
manufacturer, Allergan. During that time, U.S. patients and payers were
shelling out a lot for the extraordinarily expensive brand-name drug even
though the relevant patents on Restasis had long been invalidated or expired.”



Watch the full committee markup HERE
<[link removed]>.



Read more on Q1/Q2 reforms HERE
<[link removed]>
.



Learn more about market-based solutions to hold Big Pharma accountable and
lower drug pricesHERE
<[link removed]>
.



###

































Copyright © 2019 Campaign for Sustainable Rx Pricing
Our address is 1341 G St NW, #1100, Washington, DC xxxxxx


This email was sent to [email protected]. To unsubscribe please click
here.
<[link removed]>
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: n/a
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: n/a
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • Iterable