AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

aei logo

AEI This Week

AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

WHY ARGUMENT MATTERS

The Importance of Disagreement

September 20, 2025

The murder of Charlie Kirk and its aftermath have thrown into sharp relief the corrosion of America’s civic life. AEI Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies Director Yuval Levin explains why the most effective solution to this state of affairs is paradoxically to disagree with each other more—openly and constructively.

jpfp0821

That we have forgotten the importance of disagreement in our constitutional order reflects how far we have drifted from our founding values on the eve of America’s 250th anniversary. AEI Domestic Policy Studies Director Matthew Continetti identifies troubling recent examples of Democrats and Republicans misunderstanding the universal basis of American freedom and nationhood.

 

This drift is particularly evident in foreign policy, where President Donald Trump appears to be jettisoning America’s moral leadership by courting the favor of authoritarian regimes. Historian of US grand strategy Paul Lettow predicts how future historians will assess this striking reversal of traditional priorities.

 

One of the most important things we can do to renew America’s promise is to tackle the housing affordability crisis that limits upward mobility. In a new paper, Arthur Gailes and AEI Housing Center Codirector Edward J. Pinto propose an innovative solution to this shortage in the Western United States: founding new cities on promising tracts of federal land.

 

Similar to the housing sector, overregulation has driven up the cost of American infrastructure, especially public transit buses. In a new AEI report, urban economics expert Edward L. Glaeser and coauthors develop three ideas that could significantly lower costs.

Rational Judicial Review: Constitutions as Power-Sharing Agreements, Secession, and the Problem of Dred Scott

 

 The place of judicial review in America’s constitutional schema has been contested since the founding, and federal courts’ reliance on originalist methodology has attracted criticism from both the left and the right for failing to advance substantive common goods. In a new article for the UC Law Journal, John Yoo advances an instrumental justification for originalist judicial review. Constitutions are fundamentally power-sharing agreements, but how can constitution makers ensure all parties will obey the terms? One mechanism is to have an independent judiciary enforce the original terms of the agreement. Yoo argues that in the US context, originalist judicial review therefore serves as a valuable commitment mechanism to ensure future compliance with the Constitution’s political bargain. 

More from AEI

RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Pro-Growth Fixes for the National Environmental Policy Act

James Pethokoukis | AEIdeas

 

Family as the Foundation of Republican Democracy

Robert P. George | New York University School of Law Democracy Project

 

Deep Learning for Solving Economic Models

Jesús Fernández-Villaverde | National Bureau of Economic Research

 

One Big Beautiful Step Toward Education Freedom: How the Federal Scholarship Tax Credit Became Law

Jim Blew et al. | American Enterprise Institute

 

Improving the Efficiency of Government-Funded Transportation Projects: An AEI-Brookings Project

American Enterprise Institute and Brookings Institution

PODCASTS AND VIDEOS

The Trump Administration’s Surprising China Policy

Aaron Friedberg | Conversations with Bill Kristol

 

Election Administration in All-Mail-Voting States

John C. Fortier et al. | The Voting Booth

 

Presidential Greatness and the Fragility of Judicial Supremacy

Jack Landman Goldsmith et al. | AEI event

 

Federal Student Loan Repayments

Beth Akers | AEI video

 

Trump’s Capital Crime Crackdown: Rafael Mangual Explains

Danielle Pletka et al. | What the Hell Is Going On?

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

opening_quote

 Americans must realize that future population growth, if it occurs at all, will increasingly depend on immigration. Depopulation, for its part, will be a ‘stress test’ for our society, economy and political system—and it is by no means clear we are ready to pass that test yet. Without immigration, America’s working-age population would shrink immediately—as in this year.

closeing_quote

—Nicholas Eberstadt

 

Ensure delivery  |  Subscribe

 

American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research 

1789 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC,20036

202.862.5800 | www.aei.org

 Unsubscribe from the link below

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
Podcast Logo New_Gray

Donate to AEI in support of defending and promoting freedom, opportunity, and enterprise.

This message is for: [email protected] | Manage preferences or Unsubscribe