Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
[link removed]


** OPINION
------------------------------------------------------------


** The real reasons why Kimmel’s show is off the air
------------------------------------------------------------
Current FCC commissioner Brendan Carr, left, and President Donald Trump, shown here in a photo from 2024. (Brandon Bell/Pool via AP)

So Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show on ABC has been taken off the air indefinitely following comments he made in a monologue about the shooting death of Charlie Kirk.

That’s how most media outlets described what happened. That’s how I described what happened in Thursday's Poynter Report.

But that’s not exactly right.

As many pointed out in the past day, it would be more accurate to say ABC pulled Kimmel’s show off the air following comments made by FCC chair Brendan Carr.

On a conservative podcast, Carr essentially called for Kimmel’s show to be taken off the air, saying, “Look, we can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to change conduct, to take action, frankly, on Kimmel or, you know, there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”

Within hours of Carr’s podcast appearance, Nexstar Media Group — which owns ABC affiliates in 32 markets across the U.S. — announced it was pulling Kimmel’s show “indefinitely.” ABC followed by saying it was taking Kimmel off the air.

Carr then praised the decision in a social media post Thursday, writing ([link removed]) , “Broadcast TV stations have always been required by their licenses to operate in the public interest—that includes serving the needs of their local communities. And broadcasters have long retained the right to not air national programs that they believe are inconsistent with the public interest, including their local communities’ values. I am glad to see that many broadcasters are responding to their viewers as intended.”

This is quite a different stance than the one Carr has taken in the past.

In February 2019, Carr tweeted ([link removed]) , “Should the government censor speech it doesn’t like? Of course not. The FCC does not have a roving mandate to police speech in the name of the ‘public interest.’”

In 2021, Carr wrote in a statement ([link removed]) , “A newsroom’s decision about what stories to cover and how to frame them should be beyond the reach of any government official …”

In 2022, Carr posted ([link removed]) , “President Biden is right. Political satire is one of the oldest and most important forms of free speech. It challenges those in power while using humor to draw more people in to the discussion. That’s why people in influential positions have always targeted it for censorship.”

In 2023, Carr tweeted ([link removed]) , “Free speech in the counterweight — it is the check on government control. That is why censorship is the authoritarian’s dream.”

Want more hypocrisy?

As The New York Times’ Jim Rutenberg noted ([link removed]) , “President Trump received thunderous applause during his second inaugural address in January when he vowed to ‘immediately stop all government censorship and bring back free speech to America.’”

“Trump and many on the right, for years, have griped about “cancel culture” — something Trump, himself, called “the very definition of totalitarianism.”

“Yet,” Rutenberg writes, “he is now conducting the most punishing government crackdown against major American media institutions in modern times, using what seems like every tool at his disposal to eradicate reporting and commentary with which he disagrees.”

And those tools are working. To borrow a phrase from a certain box office hit set in the 1970s when the White House flexed its muscle to maintain power and snuff out criticism: follow the money.

CBS and its parent company, Paramount, recently settled a Trump lawsuit because it needed FCC approval to merge with SkyDance. At the moment, Nexstar is looking to buy another huge local station owner, Tegna. Approval of the deal will require the FCC to bend the rules.

The Washington Post’s Lili Loofbourow wrote ([link removed]) , “It’s hard not to connect those dots. It seems possible, and even probable, that Nexstar indefinitely preempted Kimmel’s show because Trump’s FCC chairman made it clear there would be consequences — which might have to do with the Tegna deal — if he didn’t.”
In addition, CNN’s Jake Tapper noted ([link removed]) that Disney and CEO Bob Iger also have something at stake here. Disney and Hulu want to acquire Fubo — another deal that needs approval from the Trump administration.

Tapper said, “Bob Iger is going to have to make a decision, a legacy-defining decision, that could put him at odds with the Trump administration. Or it could put him at odds with the principle about whether or not a government should be pushing private companies to cancel speakers and speech they don’t like.”

Carr is using phrases like “public interest” as the reason why Kimmel’s show is off the air. Trump tried to distance himself from accusations of censorship by saying Kimmel had bad ratings. However, ratings wouldn’t be a reason to suddenly cancel a show without warning, nor did Nexstar say anything about ratings when it pulled the show.

It’s clear that Kimmel’s show has been pulled because they — Trump and his followers — simply don’t like Kimmel and the things he says. This isn’t anything new. Trump’s dislike of Kimmel goes back years. When CBS announced earlier this summer that it was canceling Stephen Colbert’s show, Trump posted on social media, “I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next.”

American Civil Liberties Union’s Democracy and Technology Division director Christopher Anders said in a statement ([link removed]) , “This is beyond McCarthyism. Trump officials are repeatedly abusing their power to stop ideas they don’t like, deciding who can speak, write, and even joke. The Trump administration's actions, paired with ABC's capitulation, represent a grave threat to our First Amendment freedoms.”

Illinois Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker tweeted ([link removed]) , “This is the playbook, folks. If you're not paying attention now and doing something about it, then you're going to have to sit down the rest of your life because democracy is being taken away. Do not be quiet in this moment.”

But that’s exactly what’s happening, as some media companies wilt under the threats of Trump and other government officials.

Longtime ESPN personality Dan Le Batard, who now runs his own media company and podcast, crushed Iger, saying, “Seeing Jimmy Kimmel not have the protection of something as powerful as Disney because corporate interests in media are filled with such cowardice that you have a situation where not even Bob Iger has the money or the power to stand up to the threat that is presently upon the shores of everyone in media because of how compromised they are by a series of mergers and money interests. And to see Bob Iger show this kind of cowardice and bend the knee again, again with Trump, not the first time because what happens here is once you’re a coward who’s extorted, the bully is going to keep extorting the coward.”

Media Matters’ Matt Gertz wrote ([link removed]) , “Trump has long benefited from a massive parallel right-wing ecosystem ([link removed]) , from Fox News to talk radio to a host of MAGA streamers and influencers. But since Trump won election last fall, more and more of the corporate titans who control the U.S. media have come under his thumb. When Trump attempted similar extortion tactics ([link removed]) during his first term, the heads of media companies and owners of news outlets were willing to fight him in court. But since his election in November, executives at companies like Disney have proved far more willing to bend to his will.”

Gertz added an ominous warning that’s hard to disagree with: “Trump’s endgame is clear. He wants to ensure that media outlets don’t produce coverage that criticizes him or his administration, but instead convey an endless stream of propaganda about his accomplishments. He wants every outlet to be Fox News. And at this rate, he may get it.”


** What does Kimmel do?
------------------------------------------------------------

As of Thursday night, Kimmel has not spoken publicly about his show being pulled from the air.

While ABC has not said the show is permanently canceled, it seems unlikely that the show will ever return.

Kimmel is in a tough spot. He could maybe get back on the air by apologizing. The biggest reason he might do that is to preserve the jobs of the people who work on the show.

But an inauthentic apology for comments he meant would be bending his knee to Trump — something Kimmel is unlikely to do.

Leaving the show, however, might be seen as giving in to Trump’s wishes to get him off the air.

In the end, Kimmel could force ABC’s hand (as well as Nexstar's). He could refuse to apologize or show any contrition whatsoever, which is likely to result in ABC permanently cutting ties with him.


** A quiet view
------------------------------------------------------------

What did one of the most outspoken shows on television — “The View” — say about the Kimmel controversy?

Nothing. Not one word.

They talked about FBI director Kash Patel’s congressional hearing on Wednesday. They talked about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. But they didn’t say a peep about Kimmel’s show being yanked off the air.

The Hollywood Reporter’s James Hibberd wrote ([link removed]) , “A source close to the show insists the panel was not forbidden from discussing Kimmel. It’s admittedly possible the panelists opted to self-censor during a period of internal crisis, as it’s difficult to imagine they didn’t find the topic compelling enough to discuss.”

Of course, it needs to be mentioned that “The View” is on ABC. ABC’s “Good Morning America” discussed it briefly at the top of its show. It was the second topic behind Trump’s visit to the U.K. “GMA” delivered the news with no commentary.

Trump has criticized “The View” in the past. After the early summer announcement that Stepen Colbert’s late-night show on CBS was cancelled, Trump even said “The View” could be “next to go.”


** Letterman speaks
------------------------------------------------------------

Legendary late-night host David Letterman called Kimmel’s suspension a “misery” and “ridiculous.”

Speaking at The Atlantic Festival on Thursday, Letterman said, “We all see where this is going, correct? It’s managed media. You can’t go around firing somebody because you’re fearful or trying to suck up to an authoritarian, a criminal administration in the Oval Office. That’s just not how this works.”

The New York Times’ Matt Stevens has more ([link removed]) .


** Stephen A. Smith’s take
------------------------------------------------------------

Meanwhile, ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith did have something to say about Kimmel. But for a guy who makes a very nice living screaming hot takes on sports and, occasionally, politics, and essentially saying what he wants when he wants on a million platforms, Smith’s take was rather odd.

On his SiriusXM political show, “Straight Shooter with Stephen A. Smith,” Smith said, “The only thing that I would say as it pertains to Jimmy Kimmel is, where was the joke? Because you’re a late-night host — and obviously that has a comedic attachment to it. Where was the joke? Obviously, there wasn't anything funny about that.”

Smith seems to be missing the point. Just because, in Smith’s opinion, there was no comedic element to Kimmel’s comments doesn’t mean Kimmel’s show should be taken off the air.

While Smith’s take might be a bit odd and somewhat disappointing, it should not be at all surprising. First off, Disney pays Smith about $21 million a year, so he has every reason to have ABC’s back. And there’s this: it’s no secret that Smith would love to have Kimmel’s job. I’m a fan of Smith most of the time, but I’m not sure he had much credibility on this topic.


** Powerful cover
------------------------------------------------------------

Here is Barry Britt’s powerful cover for the next edition of The New Yorker:


** Media news, tidbits and interesting links for your weekend review
------------------------------------------------------------
* The New York Times is reporting that Bob Iger, Disney’s CEO, and television chief Dana Walden ultimately made the call on Kimmel. Here’s more ([link removed]) on the business aspect of it from the Times’ Andrew Ross Sorkin, Bernhard Warner, Sarah Kessler, Michael J. de la Merced, Niko Gallogly and Lauren Hirsch.
* In a column for Politico, Aziz Huq, who teaches law at the University of Chicago, thinks Kimmel should sue the Trump administration: “Jimmy Kimmel Should Have Strong Odds at the Supreme Court.” ([link removed])
* The Los Angeles Times’ Lorraine Ali with “After Kimmel and Colbert, who’s next in the war against free speech? Not Gutfeld.” ([link removed])
* In an opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal, Congressman Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, with “Now the Right Muzzles Free Speech.” ([link removed])
* Washington Post contributing columnist Matt Bai with “Why does defending awful speech matter? Now you know.” ([link removed])
* On any other day, this might have been the biggest story. Kamala Harris says in her upcoming book that her first choice for running mate in last year’s election was Pete Buttigieg. However, Harris thought it was too much to ask Americans to elect a Black woman as president and a gay man as VP. She wrote, “Part of me wanted to say, Screw it, let’s just do it. But knowing what was at stake, it was too big of a risk.” Here’s more ([link removed]) from The Atlantic’s Jonathan Lemire.
* And here’s The New York Times’ Katie Rogers with “In ‘107 Days,’ Kamala Harris Lays Out Her Regrets.” ([link removed])
* Vanity Fair announced ([link removed]) 12 new hires, including Jennifer Pastore, Olivia Nuzzi, Lindsey Underwood and Aidan McLaughlin.
* Now that Molly Qerim has abruptly left as host of ESPN’s “First Take,” the network will spend the next month and half essentially holding tryouts for replacement. The Athletic’s Richard Deitsch has the details ([link removed]) .


** More resources for journalists
------------------------------------------------------------
* Stop wasting hours on repetitive tasks — automate them instead. Learn how ([link removed]) .
* Get training to track federal climate policy rollbacks and their local impacts. Enroll now ([link removed]) .
* Deepen your coverage of incarcerated women and women with incarcerated family members and get the chance to apply for one of five $10,000 reporting grants. Enroll now ([link removed]) .
* Turn your life story into a memoir in this pioneering virtual workshop led by Poynter's Director of Craft Kristen Hare, featuring accomplished authors as guest instructors. Enroll now ([link removed]) .
* Master the tools to connect Washington decisions to local stories — essential coverage as the 2026 elections approach. Enroll now ([link removed]) .
* Access ([link removed]) Poynter’s comprehensive mental health reporting resources.
* New manager? Gain the critical skills you need on your path to leadership in journalism, media and technology. Apply now ([link removed]) .

Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) .

The Poynter Report is your daily dive into the world of media, packed with the latest news and insights. Get it delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday by signing up here ([link removed]) . And don’t forget to tune into our biweekly podcast ([link removed]) for even more.
[link removed]
Help Poynter strengthen journalism, truth and democracy. ([link removed])
GIVE NOW ([link removed])

ADVERTISE ([link removed]) // DONATE ([link removed]) // LEARN ([link removed]) // JOBS ([link removed])
Did someone forward you this email? Sign up here. ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] mailto:[email protected]?subject=Feedback%20for%20Poynter
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
© All rights reserved Poynter Institute 2025
801 Third Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
If you don't want to receive email updates from Poynter, we understand.
You can change your subscription preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe from all Poynter emails ([link removed]) .