Truth vs. Intimidation: Which Side Wins?Intercollegiate Review | Conservatism's sharpest voices, curated weekly. ISI's Intercollegiate Review brings you the best in serious conservative thought.
Honoring Charlie Kirk: Refusing to Be SilencedA week has passed since Charlie Kirk’s brutal murder during a public debate at a Utah university. In the aftermath of the tragedy, conservatives have been left reeling—both from the shock of Kirk’s death and the disturbingly celebratory response from some on the Left. The events have revealed the dangerous consequences of a progressive culture that labels traditional conservative views as “hate speech” and seeks to silence them. In an article for the New York Post, ISI President Johnny Burtka and Collegiate Network Executive Director Marlo Slayback urge conservatives not to let Kirk’s assassination scare them into silence. They suggest the goal of political violence is to shut down discourse through intimidation. The best way to honor Charlie Kirk’s legacy is to continue challenging the falsehoods of progressive ideology—even in the face of threats. College students can counter ideological conformity on their campuses by partnering with ISI and similar organizations to host debates and bring in conservative speakers. Instead of backing down in the face of hostility, students should rally together and—supported by the proper authorities—show that violence will not silence free speech. This dedication to civil discourse, despite the dangers, is what made Charlie Kirk’s voice so powerful. Read the rest of Burtka and Slayback’s article here.
The Math Behind Supporting Aging PopulationsOver the past few decades, the West has confronted two troubling trends. First, millions of people have become increasingly dependent on government support to survive, with some exploiting the system to live off taxpayer dollars. Second, birth rates across the West have fallen below replacement levels. Fewer children mean an aging population that struggles to sustain a thriving society. In the Financial Times, John Burn-Murdoch explains how these two trends have combined to threaten the French and British economies. Both countries have entrenched pension systems that have proven to be financially unsustainable and politically untouchable. Government spending to support their aging populations has risen so rapidly that income growth for French and British pensioners now far outpaces that of their working-age counterparts. Yet attempts to curb costs have been met with public outrage and have been quickly abandoned. The result, Burn-Murdoch writes, has been financially devastating for both France and Britain. Debt-to-GDP ratios have soared, while infrastructure spending has been slashed to fund pensions. If there is to be any hope of turning things around, voters and politicians alike must eventually “confront mathematical reality.” Read the rest of Burn-Murdoch’s article here. CompendiumEvery article we feature here is available to read for free. Articles from paywalled publications are available through gift links.
Upcoming ISI EventsIf you enjoy what you’re reading here, we invite you to engage with ISI at one of our upcoming in-person events.
Visit our events page on our website to see all upcoming events. This week, from ISI’s Digital Media:Can a man be both truly great and a devoted father? In the latest Project Cosmos episode, James Orr, Alex Petkas, Nathan Pinkoski, Dan McCarthy, Johnny Burtka, and Bill Rivers dive into ambition, virtue, and legacy in a lively roundtable conversation. Subscribe to our YouTube channel for more content like this. This week, from the Collegiate Network:ISI’s Collegiate Network supports over 80 student-run publications across the country, empowering students to run independent college newspapers, magazines, and journals that report on important issues ignored by the mainstream media.
Visit our Student Journalism section to read more from the Collegiate Network. Academic Freedom and American Conservatism: A Delicate BalanceThe concept of academic freedom seems simple on its face. In practice, however, protecting it requires maintaining a delicate balance among a variety of often conflicting interests. According to the Supreme Court, universities have the freedom to determine “who may teach, what may be taught, how it shall be taught, and who may be admitted to study”—but this institutional freedom often conflicts with the equally important rights of professors and even, to some extent, students. In this week’s Modern Age article—excerpted from ISI’s American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia—Daniel E. Ritchie examines how American conservatives have historically sought to balance competing academic freedom interests. In the 1950s, he notes, William F. Buckley questioned the prevailing notion of academic freedom because he believed it provided cover to academic ideologues seeking to undermine religion and liberty in America. By the 21st century, however, academic freedom has become one of the few remaining defenses for conservative professors and students against college administrations’ attempts to enforce conformity to progressive ideology. Ultimately, Ritchie says that conservatives are “likely to continue to press for a pluralism of approaches to the pursuit of knowledge and for the valid distinction between teaching and propagandizing.” Read the rest of Ritchie’s discussion of academic freedom here on the Modern Age website. Modern Age is ISI’s flagship publication. Visit modernagejournal.com and subscribe for a free daily newsletter. “If you believe in something, you need to have the courage to fight for those ideas—not run away from them or try and silence them.” – Charlie Kirk Celebrate America’s semiquincentennial with ISI and help shape the next 250 years of our country. Your support of the America 500 Education Fund will help ISI reach, teach, and launch the next generation of conservative leaders. Visit isi.org/america500 to learn more. |