Iconic consumer brands have begun pledging to temporarily or indefinitely halt
advertisements on Facebook due to its consistent mishandling of extremi


<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
Tech & Terrorism: Major Corporations Boycott Facebook Ad Spending Over Content
Moderation Mishandling

(New York, N.Y.) – Iconic consumer brands have begun pledging
<[link removed]>
to temporarily or indefinitely halt advertisements on Facebook due to its
consistent mishandling of extremist content, hateful rhetoric, and divisive
information on its site. The boycott bymore than 100
<[link removed]>
leading advertisers reflects ongoing frustration over Facebook’s ineffective
content moderation processes, allowing advertisements to run adjacent to
questionable content on its platform.

In 2019, the Counter Extremism Project (CEP) wrote to leadership at the World
Federation of Advertisers, the American Association of Advertising Agencies,
and the Association of National Advertisers as well as their members,
advocating for their organizations to join with other large companies to pull
their advertising from platforms identified as having extremist or harmful
content on their sites. CEP warned of the risks regarding specific platforms’
placement of their advertisements next to extremist and terrorist content.

Despite assurances to the contrary, Facebook’s policing of extremist material
is routinely unaddressed. Senior executives have even gone so far as toblock
<[link removed]>
measures that would have addressed systematic software flaws that helped
promote extremist content on its site.

“Facebook clearly outlines removal policies for extremist content in its
Community Standards, but they inconsistently enforce their terms. It’s clear
that advertisers have had enough, and they rightly understand that the best way
to influence Facebook is through their dollars,” said CEP Executive Director
David Ibsen. “Facebook has a responsibility to businesses, lawmakers, and the
public alike to provide greater accountability and transparency and should
establish—and uphold—more reliable solutions to curbing the content moderation
problems on its platform.”

As CEP Senior Advisor Dr. Hany Farid wrote
<[link removed]>
in a March 2019USA Today op-ed, advertising revenue is a crucial way to
influence tech companies—they must be hit on their bottom line until the
industry finally decides to take the issue of online extremism seriously. Dr.
Farid said that corporate CEOs can move to pause their social media advertising
buys and “stand up and say unequivocally: Enough is enough. We will no longer
be the fuel that allows social media to lead to deaths of innocents, to
interfere in democratic elections, to be the vessel for distributing child
sexual abuse material, extremism material, and dangerous conspiracies … These
corporate titans should lead not only because it is the right thing to do, but
also because it is in their corporate interest. It is bad for business when
their product and corporate logo is advertised against terror-related, child
sexual abuse, conspiracy, hateful and harmful content.”

Dr. Farid again echoed these concerns in his testimony
<[link removed]>
last week before a joint subcommittee of the U.S. House Committee on Energy &
Commerce on the effect online disinformation has had on the country. In his
testimony, Dr. Farid called upon major advertisers to halt their ad spending
insisting on effective changes. Dr Farid concluded his testimony saying: “If
advertisers, that are the fuel behind social media, took a stand against online
abuses, they could withhold their advertising dollars to insist on real change.
Standing in the way of this much needed change is a lack of corporate
leadership, a lack of competition, a lack of regulatory oversight, and a lack
of education among the general public. Responsibility, therefore, falls on the
private sector, government regulators, and we the general public.”

 ###

Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>