FEMA Employees Caught Watching Porn at Work
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

[Header]

FEMA Employees Caught Watching Porn at Work

JUDICIAL WATCH SUES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OVER LAST-MINUTE JANUARY 6
TARGETING

[[link removed]]


The Biden administration, anticipating President-elect Donald
Trump’s promise to issue pardons for January 6, 2021, defendants, is
believed to have accelerated prosecutions in the final months of
Biden’s term.

That is why we filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against the U.S. Department of Justice for records on accelerated
January 6 prosecutions after Donald Trump was elected president in
November 2024 (_Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:25-cv-02161)).

We sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after
the Justice Department failed to respond to a November 2024 FOIA
request for the records of then-Attorney General Merrick Garland,
then-Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco, then-Principal Deputy
Associate Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer, and then-Special Counsel
Jack Smith “regarding a) pardons of any person(s) incarcerated due
convictions in federal court in the District of Columbia related to
crimes committed at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C, on Wednesday,
Jan. 6, 2021 b) directives or orders to focus on arresting additional
suspects by type of offense allegedly committed. The timeframe of the
request is from January – November 2024.”

On January 6, 2025, the Justice Department reportedly
[[link removed]]
considered charging up to 200 additional people
[[link removed]]
for their alleged involvement at the U.S. Capitol disturbance. About
1,583 people already had been facing federal charges. On January 17,
2025, it was reported that the FBI and federal prosecutors continued
[[link removed]]
to make arrests and “pursue hefty sentences for those who breached
the U.S. Capitol grounds.” Authorities made four arrests just days
before Trump’s inauguration.

The corrupt Biden Justice Department tried to undermine the Trump
administration by maliciously prosecuting American citizens tied to
January 6. Our lawsuit aims to get to the truth about this last-minute
abuse of power.

We have several FOIA lawsuits dealing with the lawfare targeting Trump
and his supporters.

In August 2025, we announced that the U.S. Air Force will finally
provide
[[link removed]
military funeral honors
[[link removed]]
to Ashli
Babbitt, the Air Force veteran who was shot and killed inside the U.S.
Capitol by then-Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd on January 6, 2021.
Babbitt was the only official January 6 homicide victim. The Biden
administration had previously denied Babbitt and her family these
honors in retaliation for being at the U.S. Capitol that day. This
decision comes on the heels of a massive, nearly $5 million Trump
administration
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
to her family for wrongful death and other claims against the U.S.
Government.

Also in August, a Georgia state court issued an
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
in our
lawsuit for Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis to provide new
information and potentially conduct a new search for Trump-related
records because her affidavit to the court made no reference to
whether any searches of the devices of former Fulton County Special
Prosecutor Nathan Wade or those of Chief Investigator Michael L. Hill,
who was involved in gathering evidence and coordinating investigative
efforts and likely met
[[link removed]]
with the January 6 Committee.

In May 2025, we
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
the U.S. Department of Defense for records regarding a reported 2021
meeting between then-Attorney General Merrick Garland and
then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley during
which they discussed President Trump. During the meeting, Milley is
alleged to have pressured Garland to target “far-right” militia
movements (_Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Defense_
[[link removed]
_(No.
1:25-cv-01330)).

In April 2025, we
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
a FOIA lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service to obtain records
related to possible improper targeting of January 6, 2021, Capitol
protesters, their supporters, and related nonprofits (_Judicial Watch
v. Internal Revenue Service_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:25-cv-01290)).

In February 2025, we
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
the U.S.
Department of Defense for information about two conference calls
involving then-Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Mark Milley with
the Departments of Justice, Interior and Homeland Security regarding
coordination for the January 6, 2021, election certification
(_Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Defense_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:25-cv-00439)).

In December 2024, we
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
the
Justice Department for details of a reported meeting between Attorney
General Merrick Garland and. Milley in which they discussed President
Trump and during which General Milley pressured Garland to target
American “far right” militia movements (_Judicial Watch Inc. v.
U.S. Department of Justice_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:24-cv-03380)).



FEMA, LATEST AGENCY WITH EMPLOYEES WATCHING PORN AT WORK

Most of us believe that Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
employees are dedicated to keeping us safe, but it turns out many of
them were watching porn at work on government computers. Our
_Corruption Chronicles_ blog reports
[[link removed]

> Over a decade after legislation was introduced in Congress to
> contain an epidemic of federal workers watching pornography on
> government computers, the nation’s Homeland Security Secretary has
> fired numerous employees “for consuming pornographic content
> during work hours while on government issued devices,” according
> to statement
>
[[link removed]]
> issued a few days ago by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
> “Today, I am announcing that multiple disgraced FEMA [Federal
> Emergency Management Agency] employees were fired for using their
> government devices to consume sexually explicit content while on the
> job,” said DHS Secretary Kristi Noem in the recent announcement.
> “These individuals had access to critical information and
> intelligence and were entrusted to safeguard Americans from
> emergencies—and instead they were consuming pornography.” The
> DHS secretary added that “in at least one case the pornography
> consumed was racially charged and involved bestiality.”

> During the recent audit, DHS investigators also discovered that
> nearly half of the FEMA staff regularly log into social media
> platforms while performing taxpayer funded duties. DHS’s Insider
> Threat Operations Center (ITOC) identified that one employee typed
> explicit and sexually charged phrases into a chatbot website from
> his government devices for the purpose of having the comments read
> back to him in an accent. Another individual, a government
> contracted employee also stationed at the command center, accessed a
> popular social media platform 578 times over a 30-day period. He was
> engaged in extensive interactions with individuals online, viewing
> explicit sexual content while on his work devices. He also accessed
> content that included graphic photographs and videos and, on several
> occasions, used his government computer to chat online with members
> presenting explicit content. The examples appear to be a snippet of
> the porn problem at FEMA, the beleaguered agency created by Jimmy
> Carter to help Americans recover from disasters.

> Porn has for years been part of the job at some government agencies
> and in fact, numerous federal audits have long documented the
> enraging details of public servants consuming it during business
> hours. Judicial Watch has reported on the scandal for over 15 years,
> beginning with the porn scandal at the Securities and Exchange
> Commission
>
[[link removed]]
> (SEC), the agency charged with policing the nation’s financial
> industry. While the economy crumbled, the SEC was preoccupied with
> pornography. In fact, high-ranking managers at the agency regularly
> spent work hours gawking at pornography web sites on their
> government computers while the country’s financial system
> collapsed. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has also been
> embroiled in a large-scale pornography scandal with the agency’s
> inspector general issuing a special alert involving a “significant
> increase
>
[[link removed]
> in the number of employees and contractors viewing and sharing
> unlawful or otherwise inappropriate pornographic content—including
> child pornography—using their government-issued computers and
> other communication devices. The National Science Foundation (NSF)
> has also been exposed by its inspector general for employees
> spending significant portions of their workdays watching,
> downloading and e-mailing pornography
>
[[link removed]]
on
> government computers without ever getting caught. The Environmental
> Protection Agency’s inspector general has also uncovered multiple
> cases of employees working hard at watching porn.

> Government employees viewing porn on taxpayer dime has been so
> pervasive that over ten years ago a bill, Eliminating Pornography
> from Agencies Act
>
[[link removed]],
was
> introduced in Congress to contain the embarrassing crisis. Though it
> was never enacted, the proposed law brought much-needed attention to
> the matter and inspired some agencies to address the problem
> individually. The North Carolina congressman who introduced the
> measure over a decade ago said it was necessary to stop federal
> employees from accessing, watching or sharing pornography on
> government-issued computers and devices. The former Republican
> lawmaker introduced the bill after the EPA scandal, which included
> one veteran employee viewing as much as six hours of pornography a
> day in his office, according to a federal audit. The same employee
> downloaded thousands of pornographic files onto his government
> computer, and another used his official EPA email to access an
> internet site with child pornography. The former congressman, Mark
> Meadows, who introduced the anti-porn bill, rightfully said it was
> appalling that it requires an act of Congress to ensure that federal
> agencies block access to porn sites.

Until next week,

###



[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


[image]
[[link removed]]


RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN PERIL

_"When it comes to fighting for the American people’s ‘right to
know,’ no one holds a candle to Tom Fitton and his team at Judicial
Watch"_ - SEAN HANNITY

Tom Fitton returns with an exhaustive investigation into the
progressive movement’s efforts to dismantle the venerable
institutions of American rights and freedoms.

Order Tom Fitton's Must-Read Today!
[[link removed]]

[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024

202.646.5172



© 2017 - 2025, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Privacy Policy
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

View in browser
[[link removed]]