From The American Prospect <[email protected]>
Subject What would a No Kings budget look like?
Date September 15, 2025 3:50 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Democrats have powerful options to arrest the slide to authoritarianism.Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here to get The Daily Prospect Monday through Friday. [link removed]

[link removed]

**SEPTEMBER 15, 2025**

Click to read this email in your browser. [link removed]

Democrats are on the verge of a monumental decision over what to do with the leverage they have as government funding expires. They seem content to ask for health care changes. I say this diminishes the moment and the power grab from the Trump administration. In this piece I wanted to lay out what Democrats could actually ask for [link removed] to rebalance the power relationship in the government.

**– David Dayen, executive editor**

[link removed]

SAMUEL CORUM/SIPA USA VIA AP IMAGES

What Would a No Kings Budget Look Like? [link removed]

Democrats have now confirmed what was an open secret last week: They’re going to use their leverage in the upcoming government funding showdown, where their votes are needed to pass anything in the Senate, to ask for health care changes [link removed], in particular an extension of enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies that expire at the end of the year. Both House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), along with other legislative leaders, pronounced themselves united on this, insisting that Democrats will put their imprint on the budget deal and reject any “clean” stopgap funding that is negotiated without them.

“We have broad agreement that the health of the American people should be paramount in this debate,” Rep. Richie Neal (D-MA), the Democrats’ top member of the House Ways and Means Committee, told Politico [link removed].

I’ve made my thoughts [link removed] known [link removed] on this. I understand the logic of presenting a straightforward message on an issue where the public trusts Democrats, and deliver something that I agree is desperately needed to prevent a huge shock to the system [link removed] and millions of Americans’ sudden loss of insurance. Making the ask tangible and real, the theory goes, can galvanize support at a time when more people will be tuning in as the shutdown countdown nears. And if that’s what can unite House and Senate Democrats, and get Schumer to reject a Republican-only deal, so be it.

But to me, this exchanges something Republicans need (preventing a health insurance apocalypse that they created) with something they want (passing government funding on their terms). More important, it diminishes the urgency of the moment. The usual back-and-forth of bipartisan politics dictates that you ask for A as a condition for supporting B, and everyone gets something out of it. This is a quaint but dramatically wrong way to look at the stakes in America right now.

Today, Congress is on the verge of being totally sidelined, as President Trump misappropriates emergency powers, violating the law and usurping congressional spending powers in a bid to reinvent American government as a personalist autocracy. Presenting the upcoming battle as an event where Democrats fight for a health care provision is a woefully inadequate way to send a big flashing signal to the public about our shared reality. It normalizes something deeply abnormal.

Continue reading this story [link removed]

**ON OUR SITE**

**Emma Janssen** brings us coverage from Chicago as the federal government carries out its “Operation Midway Blitz [link removed]” plan.

**Harold Meyerson's** written a new piece about the GOP's continued escalation [link removed] of a war against cities.

[link removed]

Read more about the [link removed]

IDEAS, POLITICS, and POWER [link removed]

that shape the world around us at [link removed]

prospect.org [link removed]

[link removed]

**Support**

**The American Prospect**

We're a small, non-profit newsroom. Our independent reporting is supported by readers like you.

YOUR TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM prospect.org/donate

Copyright (c) 2025 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.**The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States**
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for our service.
To opt out of American Prospect membership, donation or advertising messaging, click here [link removed].
To manage your newsletter preferences, click here [link removed].
To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters, click here [link removed].

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

Sent to: [email protected]

Unsubscribe [link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis