Opinion:

By Anon and The Capitalist Staff

In footage circulating across social media, a young woman beams into her phone camera, her expression one of unalloyed delight—as if recounting a promotion or a child's first steps. "The best part about this whole goddamn thing" she begins, her voice bubbling with glee, "Is that he is not martyr material so his death will mean nothing."

Only when the audio clarifies does the horror land: This is no tale of triumph, but a young woman, the type you would see anywhere in this nation celebrating the assassination of a political adversary.

The video, on her now private account, captured in the hours after Charlie Kirk's fatal shooting on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University, will be seen millions of times, reposted across the globe. She ends the video ecstatically “It’s just great.” The damage has been done—not just to her reputation and career, which will likely unravel in the cascade of firings and public shaming that follow, — but to the fragile illusion that political enmity stops short of bloodlust.

A message from our sponsor (piece continues below)

In Partnership with Native Path

Friend, picture this with me:

Your physician grinning over your next blood test results...

Never again having to worry about the long bathroom lines that might cause an embarrassing leak…

Or the muscle spasms waking you up throughout the night…

What's more: enjoying energy, strength, and stamina so strong, even your grandkids can’t keep up with you.

I'm even willing to bet your brain will be firing on all cylinders, with memory and social skills so strong that your family and friends will be asking what you’re doing differently!

Best of all…

THIS “salty” drink is completely natural and safe… and based on study participant results, can start working in as little as 2 hours!

>>> Discover the 7 reasons everyone born before 1973 needs THIS “salty” drink

Learn More

(Piece continues)

Kirk, the 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA, was no stranger to controversy. A Trump ally who built a multimillion-dollar empire mobilizing young conservatives, he thrived on debate, often inviting liberal interlocutors onstage for pointed but civil exchanges. His death by a sniper's bullet to the neck during an outdoor speech attended by 3,000 students, shattered that ethos.

The suspect, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson from St. George, Utah, surrendered to authorities on September 12 after his family, tipped off by FBI photos, persuaded him to turn himself in. It is still early but Robinson appears to have become increasingly politicized and radicalized by the left, opposed to Kirk's views, he had reportedly etched extremist slogans on the bullet casings. The killing, unfolding in broad daylight before a crowd, evoking a grim echo the assassinations of the 1960s.

Yet as wrenching as the act itself was the aftermath: a torrent of online jubilation from corners of the left once dismissed as fringe. Blue-haired avatars and pronoun-laden bios have long served as caricatures of progressive excess, but this was different.

The celebrants were often unremarkable individuals—teachers, nurses, even members of the military. In a matter of hours, dozens of such individuals lost their jobs, their gleeful tweets and TikToks doxxed and dissected and delivered to their employers by horrified readers. What emerged was not the cartoonish radical, but a new archetype: the “Stealth Woke.” Professionals whose outward normalcy concealed a venom that spilled unchecked into public view. It even extends to Robinson himself. Ask anybody to come up with who they thought would eventually be responsible for Kirk’s execution and very few would have thought they would look like this.

This phenomenon demands scrutiny, not schadenfreude. It reveals a cultural rot deeper than many can comprehend, where the mental guardrails of human decency have eroded to the point of nonexistence. Kirk embodied the American ideal of open discourse—he was, to the end, a husband and a father who preached dialogue over division. His willingness to engage, even with protesters of him and his events, underscored a faith in reason's redemptive power. That faith now feels quaint amid a landscape where disagreement metastasizes into the crack of a rifle.

Consider the mechanics of this stealth radicalism. Social media, with its algorithmic echo chambers, has long amplified extremes, but the past decade has normalized a rhetoric of dehumanization. On the left, this manifests in portrayals of conservatives not as misguided peers, but as irredeemable villains—fascists, enablers of white supremacy, obstacles to justice, “Nazis”. Kirk, with his critiques of campus "woke" culture and defenses of Second Amendment rights, became a lightning rod. Online harassment of conservative figures like Kirk is often laced with violent imagery.

But the “Stealth Woke” transcend memes and trolls. They are embedded in institutions, their views simmering beneath professional veneers. The girl in the video, radiated the affability of trust; her body language, sans sound, could pass for innocuous joy. Play the audio, and the dissonance chills: a gleeful endorsement of political murder, posted without apparent hesitation.

“That might be what’s most crushing, sure you’ll find psychos online who are clearly down deep in the hole of evil, we’ve all seen that, but the ones who look like “normies” celebrating such an act is deeply disturbing.” - Anonymous

Similar cases proliferated. A high school teacher was placed on leave by her district for her posts. A U.S. Army soldier prompted an investigation by the Department of Defense for theirs. These were not anonymous “edgelords”, but "normies"—adults with mortgages, PTA meetings to go to, résumés and relationships—who bypassed the internal whisper of "Should I really post this?" Their firings, while swift, underscore a deeper malaise: When did celebrating death become not just tolerable, but instinctive?

This is no mere left-wing pathology; it's a mirror to broader societal fractures. The left's “Stealth Woke” variant stings for its subversion of empathy, that supposed hallmark of progressive virtue.

Historical parallels abound: In the 1960s assassinations of figures like Robert Kennedy and MLK fueled cycles of recrimination, eroding trust in institutions. The “Stealth Woke” accelerate this, blurring lines between private resentment and public incitement. Why post publicly? Perhaps the dopamine of likes, or the illusion of safety in numbers. More troublingly, it suggests a desensitization where Kirk's humanity—his two young children, his devotion to family—registers as irrelevant collateral.

Yet amid the outrage, glimmers of accountability emerge. Employers, from hospitals to school boards, have acted decisively, reminding us that norms endure when enforced. Robinson's family, in turning him in, modeled a quiet heroism: a pastor and father bridging the chasm of radicalization. These acts hint at reclamation, a refusal to let the “Stealth Woke” define the discourse.

As the nation grapples with Kirk's absence—his casket borne on Air Force Two by allies like JD Vance—we must confront what his death unmasks. Not the stereotypes of dyed hair and piercings, but the insidious creep of rage into everyday lives.

America is at a crossroads, If it is to heal, it demands more than finger-pointing: it demands a reckoning with how the beasts of division have been fed. Will we rebuild the table of dialogue Kirk so cherished, or let stealth radicalism claim the public square?

The answer lies not in vengeance, but in vigilance—over our words, our feeds, and the quiet erosions within.

For in celebrating a death, we diminish our own.