[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
When Trump Took Over DC, NYT First Ignored, Then Belittled Protests Pete Tucker ([link removed])


WaPo: Thousands march in D.C. against Trump’s law enforcement takeover

Thousands of people marching against the military occupation of our nation's capital (Washington Post, 9/6/25 ([link removed]) ) was not a news story to the New York Times.

Despite the late-summer sun bearing down, thousands of protesters marched towards the White House last Saturday carrying anti-Trump and Free DC signs. Many hailed from unions, activist organizations and religious groups. Two friends drove all the way from Illinois; “absolutely” it was worth it, they told the Washington Post (9/6/25 ([link removed]) ).

Also at the protest was John Hanrahan, a longtime editor and journalist, and a former Post reporter who worked alongside Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein in the Metro section—where he was a "third-string Watergate reporter ([link removed]) "—until he refused to cross the Post pressmen’s picket line in 1975 (Esquire, 3/1/78 ([link removed]) ).

Sunday morning, when Hanrahan picked the New York Times off his doorstep—yeah, he’s old school and still gets the paper edition—he didn’t see a single word or picture about the march. So late Sunday night, he wrote a letter to the editor lamenting the Times’ lack of coverage, even as other major outlets found the protest newsworthy.

“Not worth even a few column inches when thousands upon thousands of residents of a nation’s capital city stand up to protest against the ruling regime’s unwanted and unjustified takeover?” Hanrahan asked:

Would such an anti-authoritarian protest have gone unnoticed by “The Newspaper of Record” had it happened in Caracas, or Havana, or Moscow, or Beijing, or Tehran? The question answers itself.


** 'Only a few scattered protests'
------------------------------------------------------------
NYT: Grand Juries in D.C. Reject Wave of Charges Under Trump’s Crackdown

A valuable New York Times story (9/6/25 ([link removed]) ) about grand jury resistance to the military occupation dismissed widespread street activism as "only a few scattered protests."

Less than eight hours after firing off his letter, Hanrahan scooped the Monday Times off his doorstep. Once again, there was nothing on the march. There was, however, a story (9/6/25 ([link removed]) ) on how DC grand juries are rejecting charges brought amid Trump’s crackdown.

“In what could be read as a citizens’ revolt,” the Times reported,

ordinary people serving on grand juries have repeatedly refused in recent days to indict their fellow residents who became entangled in either the president’s immigration crackdown or his more recent show of force.

The Times story was good—as has been much of the paper’s coverage (8/12/25 ([link removed]) , 8/16/25 ([link removed]) , 8/20/25 ([link removed]) , 9/10/25 ([link removed]) ) of Trump’s DC takeover—but its opening line didn’t sit well with Hanrahan:

In the three weeks since President Trump flooded the streets of Washington with hundreds of troops and federal agents, there have been only a few scattered protests.

DC has had more than a few protests against Trump's military occupation, and Hanrahan is in a position to know. Despite clocking in at 87 years of age, he’s been a regular presence at protests over the past month, including numerous ones “ranging from 500 to 10,000 participants,” he wrote in an email to FAIR.


** Explosion of smaller-scale actions
------------------------------------------------------------
Nation: The DC Night Patrols Are Showing Cities How to Fight Trump’s Occupation

The Nation (8/29/25 ([link removed]) ) described how DC's night patrols "document the constitutional violations or brutality...so people can see the truths about the occupation that a compliant, largely incurious media are not showing."

“If a single massive protest could get rid of this man, it would have happened already, right? And so we have to think of different things,” Alex Dodds, co-founder of Free DC, told the Washington Post (9/6/25 ([link removed]) ). “What fixes this is sustained resistance and noncooperation with people who are attempting to use our government, which belongs to us, to harm our communities and to harm us.”

And DC has seen an explosion of smaller-scale actions in response to Trump’s takeover. Parents have organized “walking school buses ([link removed]) ” to ensure kids make it safely to and from school. Others have mobilized to protect the homeless ([link removed]) . More impromptu gatherings have formed to thwart ICE agents ([link removed]) from snatching people off the streets. And each night at 8pm, neighbors bang pots and pans ([link removed]) in protest, while deeper into the night, teams of
volunteers go on night patrols ([link removed]) .

This multifaceted, coordinated response has been taking place, even as thousands of DC residents have taken part in more traditional protest marches--like the September 6 march that the Times ignored. To dismiss the vibrant grassroots resistance to Trump's occupation of DC as “only a few scattered protests" is a distortion that only serves to normalize authoritarianism.
------------------------------------------------------------

ACTION ALERT: You can send a message to the New York Times at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) or via Bluesky: @NYTimes.com ([link removed]) . Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your message in the comments thread here.


Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .