AMP Weekly News Roundup
August 23, 2019
Palestinians show solidarity with Kashmir at protest outside Indian Embassy in Washington DC — Mondoweiss (8/20/19)
India’s treatment of Kashmir is eerily similar to Israel’s treatment of Palestine, and those that are fighting for Palestinian rights have taken notice. Activist group American Muslims for Palestine worked alongside the U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations to hold a demonstration for Kashmiri sovereignty in front of the Indian Embassy in Washington D.C. last Friday, showing solidarity for Kashmir. Taher Herzallah, the Associate Director of Outreach & Grassroots Organizing at AMP, was the main organizer of the event. He has deep roots in Palestinian activism and sprung into action when the Indian government revoked Article 370. “We are working with our friends in the Kashmiri community to see what plan of action to take next. We figured that a protest in front of the Indian embassy was a good first step,” Herzallah told Mondoweiss about the work AMP is doing, “However, we plan on working with them to do more and hopefully in the coming weeks we will devise a better plan to come up with strategy to approach this issue either in congress or at the UN.” Herzallah estimates that over 100 people showed up to protest in front of the embassy.
Number of Palestinians displaced by Israel in 2019 already exceeds 2018 total — Middle East Monitor (8/23/19)
The number of Palestinians displaced by Israeli occupation authorities in the first seven months of 2019 has now exceeded the total number of people displaced in all of 2018. According to new data published this week by UN OCHA, Israeli forces in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) demolished or seized 66 Palestinian-owned structures in July, displacing 47 and affecting the “livelihoods or access to services of nearly 8,000 others”. These demolitions bring “the cumulative number of people displaced due to demolitions in the first seven months of 2019” to 481, compared to 472 displaced in 2018. July saw 52 structures demolished in Area C of the West Bank, “all on grounds of lack of building permits”. Palestinians are systematically denied permits by Israel’s discriminatory planning regime. The number of structures demolished in Area C so far this year now stands at 223, according to UN OCHA, which represents an increase of 64 per cent “compared to the equivalent period in 2018”
‘Anti-Semitism’ vs. ‘Islamophobia’: How language creates hierarchies of discrimination and whitewashes bigotry — Mondoweiss (8/22/19)
One such example of strategic linguistic flexibility, taken straight from our fiction-turned-fact and prophesy-fulfilled Orwellian times: someone who hates Jews is known as an “anti-Semite”, but someone who hates Muslims is merely an “Islamophobe”, a person afraid of Islam? With a suffix borrowed from medical jargon and pinned to the name of a religious denomination, the latter term seems lackadaisically artificial and somehow comes off as rather less harmful than any compound word with the threatening prefix anti preceding its root (as a kid I always thought antipasti was Italian for “someone who hates pasta”, regardless of the fact that the language of a country in which the staple food is pasta would most probably not have a word for hating it in its vocabulary). So my question is: why is an anti-Semite not called a “Semitophobe?” And an Islamophobe not an “anti-Muslim?” And what is that even supposed to mean, “afraid of Islam?” As if the organized heterogeneous beliefs of 1.8 billion people were a Freddy Krueger-like serial killer coming to murder you in your sleep.
Why won’t Israel lobby groups condemn Trump’s anti-Semitism? — Electronic Intifada (8/21/19)
Prominent Israel lobby groups in the US have issued muted criticism or support for President Donald Trump’s anti-Semitic claim that Jews who vote for the Democratic Party show “disloyalty.” This fits a pattern where lobby groups go easy on anti-Semites who are also staunchly pro-Israel. “I think any Jewish people that vote for a Democrat – I think it shows either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty,” Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday. [...] David Harris, CEO of the American Jewish Committee, called the president’s Tuesday comments “shockingly divisive and unbecoming of the occupant of the highest elected office.” Similarly, Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, tweeted that “It’s unclear who [the president] is claiming Jews would be ‘disloyal’ to, but charges of disloyalty have long been used to attack Jews.” “As we’ve said before, it’s possible to engage in the democratic process without these claims,” Greenblatt added. What is notably missing from both of these mild rebukes is any mention of anti-Semitism, a fact that did not escape numerous commenters, especially Jews whom these groups purport to defend.
Trump’s game: bring on the Democratic Party’s ‘crisis’ over Israel — Mondoweiss (8/22/19)
Yesterday President Trump expanded on his charge that Jews are being disloyal to Israel if they vote Democratic. He said the new face of the party are Democratic Congresswomen Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib, and they are “anti-semites, they are against Israel.” "In my opinion, the Democrats have gone very far away from Israel. I cannot understand how they can do that. They don’t want to fund Israel, they want to take away foreign aid to Israel; they want to do a lot of bad things to Israel. In my opinion, you vote for a Democrat, you are being very disloyal to Jewish people and you’re being very disloyal to Israel, and only weak people would say anything different from that." Leaving aside the dual loyalty issue that is roiling the Jewish community, let’s focus on Trump’s crazy-like-a-fox political game. He is selling himself as the “king of Israel” and seizing on Israel dissenters in the Democratic Party to try to drive a wedge among Democrats. The Republican Jewish Coalition defended Trump, saying it’s an existential issue.
Are new Palestinian construction permits paving the way for annexation? — Middle East Eye (8/19/19)
From 2009 to 2016, Israeli occupation authorities approved just 66 construction permits for Palestinians in Area C – a mere two percent of total applications. Over the same time period, there were 12,763 housing unit construction starts in Israeli settlements in Area C. However, while the new construction permits barely scratch the surface of the needs resulting from an intentionally discriminatory system, it is still an unusual development. Why would a hard-right government – in the run up to elections – take such a step? One vital piece of context is the White House “peace plan”; Haaretz cited unnamed “political sources” who believe the move “could be due to American pressure”. The approvals came ahead of a visit by a US delegation led by White House adviser Jared Kushner, part of a regional tour promoting the plan. This possibility was a cause for concern for some in the settler movement; two senior leaders described the Palestinian construction permits as “particularly worrying”, given what they described as the Palestinian Authority’s “clear goal of establishing a terrorist state in the heart of the country”.
AMP EVENTS & ACTIONS
DC AREA:
PALESTINE: A NEW APPROACH
ADVOCACY & ALLIANCES
September 7, 2019
7:00 PM
CHICAGO, IL:
THE 12TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE FOR PALESTINE IN THE U.S.
ELECTION 2020: PALESTINE—WORKING FOR JUSTICE
November 28-30, 2019
|