It is fine to assume the best about people; in many ways, it is what allows civil society to function. But sometimes, individuals tell us who they really are. When they do, we really should believe them.
There is an unfortunate trend in politics where voters often refuse to recognize the true nature of the incumbents. For better or worse, candidates are essentially products. Marketing blitzes with carefully scripted ads, right down to perfectly poised family Christmas cards, create the veneer of personal intimacy without actual substance.
In nearly every case, we don’t know the candidates as individuals. We vote for the product we’re presented.
But that product is a big-ticket
item, like a house or a car. Yet more so, because my vote is a civic investment in the future for myself, my children, and neighbors. I want to get it right. And so do you.
With our votes, the candidate becomes the officeholder … and oftentimes one who doesn’t deliver. While they position themselves as "fighters" on social media, most end up somewhere on the spectrum of either ineffectual furniture or cogs in the wheels of the establishment cronies.
As you might imagine, no one ever campaigns as "cog for the cronies." Yet they show us by their actions and inactions.
Enter the cognitive dissonance, that disquieting realization that comes when confronted with two things that cannot be true at the same time. The
officeholder cannot be both the "fighter" and the "lackey."
We made the decision to purchase that big-ticket item. We made a promise to protect our kids. We told our neighbors to embrace this person. We sometimes even tie up our identity with the politician. So, instead, we clam up about our own incumbent even as we chastize others for not getting rid of theirs.
This is why incumbency has such a hold. It’s not because of the money or power, but because we shackle ourselves to our own bad decisions at the ballot box. We shackle ourselves to the servant we hired based on the promises of their campaign.
The unfortunate tendency is to become fawning cheerleaders and embarrassing apologists. We ignore facts that
contradict our initial decision. We lash out at those who point to any inconvenient facts, and we even distort reality to match the outcome we wish had been achieved.
As the hiring officers on the committee to save the republic, we must do better. Citizens should treat the selection of our servants with less personal emotion and more professional discernment. Rather than pridefully allow our losses to mount, we should be willing to move on.
When politicians show us who they really are, we should believe them, and—if necessary—replace them with someone who will actually deliver the outcomes we need.
Our constitutional republic will thrive only to the extent we remember that, as citizens, we are supposed to be in
charge.