Fani Willis Scandal Update

[INSIDE JW]

AIR FORCE GRANTS FUNERAL HONORS TO ASHLI BABBITT

[[link removed]]

We are delighted that the U.S. Air Force has finally decided to
provide full military funeral honors to Ashli Babbitt, the Air Force
veteran who was shot and killed inside the U.S. Capitol by
then-Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd on January 6, 2021.

We have been deeply involved in this case on multiple fronts from the
beginning.

Babbitt was the only official January 6 homicide victim. The Biden
administration had previously denied Babbitt and her family these
honors in retaliation for her being at the U.S. Capitol that day. This
new decision comes on the heels of a massive, nearly $5 million Trump
administration settlement to her family for wrongful death and other
claims against the U.S. Government.

Babbitt, 35, owned and operated a successful pool business with her
husband Aaron. Ashli traveled alone from San Diego to Washington, DC,
to attend the Women for America First (aka Save America) rally on
January 6, 2021, at the Ellipse near the White House.

On July 23, 2025, Judicial Watch Senior Counsel Robert Sticht wrote a
letter
[[link removed]]
to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth asking him to reverse the
“grave national injustice” of denying Babbitt and her family
military funeral honors:

> I am writing to urge you to make a new determination granting
> military funeral honors for SrA Ashli Elizabeth Pamatian, aka Ashli
> Elizabeth McEntee, and Ashli Elizabeth Babbitt, a War on Terror
> veteran of the U.S. Air Force and Air National Guard.

***

> I respectfully encourage the Department of Defense to favorably
> consider two major recent developments and also Ashli's lengthy and
> meritorious military service.

> First, on January 20, 2025, President Trump granted clemency for
> certain offenses relating to the events at or near the United States
> Capitol on January 6, 2021. The Presidential proclamation states,
> “This proclamation ends a grave national injustice that has been
> perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and
> begins a process of national reconciliation.” President Trump (a)
> commuted the sentences of certain individuals convicted of offenses
> related to events that occurred at or near the U.S. Capitol on
> January 6, 2021; (b) granted a full, complete and unconditional
> pardon to all other individuals convicted of [similar]
> offenses….

> Second … on July 2, 2025, the United States of America paid a
> damage award of nearly five million dollars to settle a wrongful
> death lawsuit that Judicial Watch and I brought forward on behalf of
> the Estate of Ashli Babbitt and her husband Aaron Babbitt to ensure
> justice and accountability for the fatal shooting of Ashli Babbitt
> on January 6, 2021. Once again, Gen. Kelly's denial of military
> funeral honors for Ashli's funeral cannot be reconciled with this
> landmark legal settlement. Many well-documented facts now clearly
> show that the fatal shooting was not justified.

> For example, Ashli was the only official homicide on January 6,
> 2021. Ashli, age 35, was unarmed when she was fatally shot. She
> stood 5’3’ tall and weighed 115 pounds. Her hands were up in the
> air, empty, and in plain view of Lt. Byrd and four armed officers
> behind him. Seven additional armed officers were behind Ashli,
> including four Containment and Emergency Response Team officers.
> Ashli posed no threat to the safety of any officer nor any Member of
> Congress who stayed after Member evacuation. Ashli was begging
> officers to call for backup before she was shot. Officers ignored
> Ashli. The only shot fired that day was the one Lt. Byrd fired to
> kill Ashli. Lt. Byrd was not in uniform. Lt. Byrd did not identify
> himself as a police officer or otherwise make his presence known to
> Ashli. Lt. Byrd also did not give Ashli any warnings or commands
> before firing the shot that killed her. Ashli never saw Lt. Byrd
> because he was hidden from her view. She was ambushed and
> defenseless. Multiple witnesses at the scene yelled, “you just
> murdered her.” Lt. Byrd later told the world on NBC Nightly News
> that he “had no clue” about the individual he shot. “I didn't
> even know it was a female until hours, way later ... that night,”
> he said.

***

> Ashli Babbitt's patriotic and courageous service in the U.S. Air
> Force and Air National Guard also merits favorable action on this
> request.

The decision to finally extend military funeral honors was confirmed
in a letter
[[link removed]]
on August 15, 2025, written by Under Secretary of the Air Force
Matthew L. Lohmeier to Aaron Babbitt, Ashli’s husband, and Ashli
Babbitt’s mother, Michelle Witthoeft:

> On behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force, I write to extend the
> offer for Military Funeral Honors for SrA Ashli Babbitt. I
> understand that the family’s initial request was denied by Air
> Force leadership in a letter dated February 9, 2021. However, after
> reviewing the circumstances of Ashli’s death, and considering the
> information that has come forward since then, I am persuaded that
> the previous determination was incorrect.

Ashli Babbitt’s family is grateful to President Trump, Secretary
Hegseth and Under Secretary Lohmeier for reversing the Biden Defense
Department’s cruel decision to deny Ashli funeral honors as a
distinguished veteran of the Air Force. Our team spent years
investigating, litigating, and exposing the truth about Ashli’s
homicide. We are proud to have done our part in bringing her family a
measure of justice and accountability for Ashli’s outrageous
killing. And our battle for justice will continue.

We obtained
[[link removed]]
the $4.975 million settlement
[[link removed]]
in the wrongful death lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against the U.S. Government on behalf of Babbitt’s family (_Estate
of Ashli Babbitt and Aaron Babbitt, et al. v. United States of
America_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:24-cv-01701 (formerly 3:24-cv-00033))).

We have been pursuing several lawsuits to secure transparency
regarding Babbitt’s death and other government activities on January
6.

In January 2023, documents
[[link removed]]
from the Department of the Air Force, Joint Base Andrews, MD, showed
Byrd was housed at taxpayer expense at Joint Base Andrews after he
shot and killed Babbitt inside the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

In November 2021, we released
[[link removed]]
multiple audio
[[link removed]],
visual
[[link removed]]
and photo record
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from the DC Metropolitan Police Department about the shooting death of
Babbitt in the U.S. Capitol Building. The records included a cell
phone video
[[link removed]]
of the shooting and an audio of a brief police interview of the
shooter, Byrd.

In October 2021, we uncovered records
[[link removed]]
from the DC
Metropolitan Police about the shooting death of Babbitt. The new
records include the January 6, 2021, Metro PD Death Report
[[link removed]]
for Babbitt (identified as Ashli Elizabeth McEntee-Babbitt Pamatian).
The investigators note that the possible manner of death was
“Homicide [Police Involved Shooting].”

COURT RAISES NEW QUESTIONS ABOUT FANI WILLIS’ TRUMP RECORDS SCANDAL

Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis can’t be trusted. Every time
we go back to court there are new excuses and new documents that she
never admitted existed. And now we find that entire universes of
records may have been ignored.

A Georgia state court ordered
[[link removed]]
her to provide new information and potentially conduct a new search
for Trump-related records because her recent affidavit to the court
made no reference to any searches of the devices of former Fulton
County Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade or those of Chief Investigator
Michael L. Hill, who were involved gathering evidence and coordinating
investigative efforts and likely met
[[link removed]]
with the January 6 Committee.

The court order was issued in our lawsuit
[[link removed]]
filed
after Willis falsely denied having any records responsive to our
earlier Georgia Open Records Act (ORA) request for communications with
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office and/or the January 6 Committee
(_Judicial Watch Inc. v. Fani Willis et al_
[[link removed]
[[link removed]
_(No.
24-CV-002805)).

A March 7, 2025 court order
[[link removed]]
directed
Willis to turn over 212 pages of records and provide an affidavit
detailing how the records were found and the reason for withholding
them from the public. The records were belatedly found in response to
our request and lawsuit. In a February 28 hearing
[[link removed]]
Willis’ lawyers admitted to finding the records after what was
believed to be a fifth search of her office.

The court awarded
[[link removed]]
Judicial Watch $21,578 in “attorney’s fees and costs.”
(Willis’ office made payment to Judicial Watch 10 days after the
court-ordered deadline.)

The new court order
[[link removed]]
states:

> On 7 March 2025, this Court, after hearing about Defendant’s
> desultory efforts to determine the full universe of responsive
> information, ordered Defendant to produce for in camera review the
> records that had been identified -- after repeated denials of their
> existence -- but which were being withheld on the basis of being
> exempt from disclosure under the State’s Open Records Act….
> Defendant timely complied with the March 2025 Order, providing the
> Court with (1) an affidavit from her Legal Counsel summarizing the
> steps taken to conduct an actual, meaningful search for the
> requested information and (2) a digital storage device containing
> 212 pages of search protocols, e-mails, text messages, and written
> correspondence. The Court has since reviewed these materials and
> concurs with Defendant that, at this point, given that the criminal
> case related to these materials remains open (if not particularly
> active), pursuant to the exceptions set forth in O.C.G.A. §
> 50-18-72, these records are not presently subject to disclosure.
> Specifically, the Court finds that the documents are “[r]ecords of
> law enforcement, prosecution, or regulatory agencies in any pending
> investigation or prosecution of criminal or unlawful activity”
> (and they are not “initial police arrest reports and initial
> incident reports”)….

> Defendant’s work is not yet done, however. In reviewing the
> submitted materials, in particular the search protocols prepared by
> each employee of Defendant whose records and devices were reviewed,
> the Court noticed the following omissions:

> 1) There was no search protocol produced for or by Investigator
> Michael L. Hill II indicating what accounts, devices, etc. were
> searched and for what terms.

> 2) It is unclear if anyone consulted with Nathan Wade, who is now
> employed elsewhere but who at the relevant time was, among other
> things, Defendant’s lead counsel for her office’s investigation
> into “possible criminal disruptions that occurred during the
> administration of the 2020 general elections in Georgia” (to use
> her office’s phrasing).

> 3) While Legal Counsel’s affidavit avers that Defendant’s own
> records were searched, the responsive materials do not include the
> search protocol used to do so nor is the scope of the search
> described.

> Consequently, Defendant shall, within fourteen days of entry of this
> Order, submit to the Court the search protocols (i.e., search terms
> used and data sources searched) for Investigator Hill and Defendant
> as well as a clarification of whether Attorney Wade’s materials
> were searched. If they were not, they shall be and any responsive
> records forwarded to the Court. If they already were, then the same
> requirement of supplying the search protocol applies. Any additional
> materials that are generated by this effort will be received in
> camera and will remain in camera pending an analysis similar to the
> one the Court performed with the first set of submitted materials.

In December 2024, Willis finally admitted to having records
[[link removed]]

[[link removed]
communications with the January 6 Committee but refused to release all
but one document in response to the court order
[[link removed]]
that found her
in default. She cited a series of legal exemptions to justify the
withholding of communications with the January 6 Committee. The only
document she did release was one already-public letter to January 6
Committee Chairman Benny Thompson (D-MS).

We subsequently filed a motion
[[link removed]],
asking the court to conduct a private inspection of any records found.

We have several FOIA lawsuits on the lawfare targeting Trump:

In February 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice asked
[[link removed]]
a
federal court to allow the agency to keep secret the names of top
staffers working in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office that is
targeting former President Donald Trump and other Americans.

(Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Special
Counsel Jack Smith previously was at the center of several
controversial issues, the IRS scandal
[[link removed]]
among them. In 2014, our investigation
[[link removed]]
revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Jack
Smith’s then-Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch
criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Read more
here
[[link removed]].)

In January 2024, we filed a lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against Fulton County,
Georgia, for records regarding the hiring of Nathan Wade as a special
prosecutor by District Attorney Fani Willis. Wade was hired to pursue
unprecedented criminal investigations and prosecutions against former
President Trump and others over the 2020 election disputes.

In October 2023, we sued
[[link removed]]
the DOJ for records and communications between the Office of U.S.
Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Fulton County, Georgia, District
Attorney’s office regarding requests/receipt of federal
funding/assistance in the investigation of former President Trump and
his 18 codefendants in the Fulton County indictment
[[link removed]]
of August 14, 2023. To date, the DOJ is refusing to confirm or deny
the existence of records, claiming that to do so would interfere with
enforcement proceedings. Our litigation challenging this is
continuing.

Through the New York Freedom of Information Law, in July 2023, we
received the engagement letter
[[link removed]]
showing New York County District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg paid $900 per
hour for partners and $500 per hour for associates to the Gibson, Dunn
& Crutcher law firm for the purpose of suing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) in
an effort to shut down the House Judiciary Committee’s oversight
investigation into Bragg’s unprecedented indictment of former
President Donald Trump.

FBI SUED FOR RECORDS OF COMEY’S PROBE OF CANDIDATE TRUMP

The FBI and Justice Department need to make all of former FBI Director
James Comey’s records of his unprecedented and abusive lawfare
available to the American public.

We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
[[link removed]]
in May 2025 against the U.S. Department of Justice for all records
regarding the FBI, under Comey, initiating an investigation of
then-2016 presidential candidate Donald Trump (_Judicial Watch Inc. v.
U.S. Department of Justice_
[[link removed]
_(No.
1:25-cv-01413)).

We sued the Justice Department after it failed to respond to a
February 28, 2025, FOIA request for:

> All records, including emails, email chains, email attachments, text
> messages, team chats, video or audio recordings, photographs,
> outlook calendars, meeting minutes, correspondence, statements,
> letters, memoranda, reports, briefings, presentations, notes,
> summaries, assessments, requests for assistance, referrals or other
> form of record, regarding:
>
> (1) Former FBI Director James Comey or his designated representative
> initiating or recommending an assessment, inquiry, preliminary
> investigation, full investigation into then Presidential candidate
> Donald J. Trump.
>
> (2) Any FBI persons assigned to conduct an assessment, inquiry,
> preliminary investigation, full investigation into then Presidential
> candidate Donald J. Trump.

The request identified the time frame as June 1, 2015, to July 1,
2016.

In July 2019, we uncovered FBI records
[[link removed]],
showing that in June 2017, a month after Comey was fired by President
Donald Trump, FBI agents visited his home and collected “as
evidence” four memos that allegedly detail conversations he had with
President Trump.

In August 2018, a federal court ordered
[[link removed]]
the Justice Department to preserve federal records located in
Comey’s personal email accounts.

In May 2018, emails
[[link removed]]
we uncovered showed Comey was advised by FBI officials in May 2017 to
consult with Special Counsel Robert Mueller prior to testifying before
any congressional committees regarding Russian meddling in the 2016
presidential election and his firing as FBI director.

In February 2018, in response to our lawsuit
[[link removed]],
the FBI agreed to review 16,750 pages
[[link removed]]
of Comey’s records that were archived after he was dismissed.

In a January 2018 lawsuit
[[link removed]]
we forced the FBI to turn over to the court for _in camera_,
non-public, review former Comey’s memos allegedly detailing
conversations he had with President Donald Trump.

In November 2017, the Justice Department compared Comey to Wikileaks
[[link removed]].
After Comey was fired by President Trump on May 9, 2017, he gave _The
New York Times_ a February 14, 2017, memorandum written about a
one-on-one conversation he had with President Trump regarding former
National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

In June 2016 we sent Acting FBI Director Andrew G. McCabe a warning
letter
[[link removed]]
concerning the FBI’s legal responsibility under the Federal Records
Act (FRA) to recover records, including memos Comey subsequently
leaked
[[link removed]]
to the media, unlawfully removed from the Bureau by Comey.

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION FAILED TO TRACK UNACCOMPANIED ALIEN CHILDREN

The Biden administration failed to safeguard hundreds of thousands of
illegal alien children it helped traffic into the United States.
We’ve filed a lawsuit to get details of this mass tragedy.

We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
[[link removed]]
against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for records about
efforts to locate unaccompanied alien children lost during the Biden
Administration (_Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Homeland
Security_
[[link removed]
_(No.
1:25-cv-02558)).

We sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after
Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) failed
to respond to April 26, 2025, FOIA requests for a document titled
“Unaccompanied Alien Children Joint Initiative Field
Implementation,” associated communications and other records
concerning unaccompanied minors coming across our borders.

The document
[[link removed]]
titled “Unaccompanied Alien Children [UAC] Joint Initiative Field
Implementation” is an internal ICE memo written in late January 2025
under the Trump Administration:

> The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration and
> Customs Enforcement (ICE), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI),
> and Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) will commence an
> operational initiative to locate unaccompanied alien children (UAC)
> who were encountered by DHS and released from the care and custody
> of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of
> Refugee Resettlement (HHS-ORR). DHS has not had contact with the
> identified UAC since their release from HHS-ORR’s care.
>
> The purpose of this initiative is for HSI to support ERO in locating
> UAC, making sure UAC’s immigration obligations are met, and
> conducting investigative activities to ensure UAC are not subjected
> to crimes of human trafficking or other exploitation.

As our _Corruption Chronicles blog_
[[link removed]]
reported:

> The government’s UAC program has for years been rocked by many
> other problems that have put young migrants at risk, including
> physical and sexual abuse at U.S.-funded shelters… A [2020]
> federal audit
[[link removed]]
> blasted the agency for failing to protect UAC from sexual misconduct
> at the facilities. During a six-month period alone, investigators
> from the HHS Inspector General’s office uncovered more than 750
> incidents involving sexual misconduct at dozens of shelters housing
> minor detainees.

In July 2025
[[link removed]]
Homeland Security Inspector General Joseph Cuffari testified before
the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and reported
[[link removed]]
“failures to properly track, process, and safeguard nearly 448,000
unaccompanied alien children who entered the United States illegally
over the last four years.” His testimony referenced a March 2025
report
[[link removed]]
titled “ICE Cannot Effectively Monitor the Location and Status of
All Unaccompanied Alien Children After Custody.”

In December 2022, we received records
[[link removed]]
from the Health and Human Services detailing the nighttime
transportation of unaccompanied alien children (UAC) by air from Texas
to Tennessee, as well as two other flights making multiple stops
across the country.

In September 2021, we received records
[[link removed]]
from the Health
and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) which listed
33 separate incidences of alleged sexual abuse in a one-month time
period.

In July 2018, after a three-year delay, we obtained records
[[link removed]]
containing nearly 1,000 summaries of Significant Incident Reports
(SIRs) from Health and Human Services, revealing that “unaccompanied
alien children” processed during the Obama administration included
admitted murderers, rapists, drug smugglers, prostitutes, and human
traffickers.

In 2014, we uncovered records
[[link removed]]
from Health and Human Services revealing that the Obama administration
paid Baptist Children and Family Services (BCFS) $182,129,786 to
provide “basic shelter care” to 2,400 “unaccompanied alien
children” (UAC) for four months in 2014. The BCFS budget included
charges for $104,215,608 for UACs at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, and an
additional $77,914,178 for UACs at Lackland Air Force Base in San
Antonio, Texas.

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, FBI, AND ODNI SUED FOR RECORDS OF SPYING ON TRUMP
CAMPAIGN ADVISOR MICHAEL CAPUTO

There is significant evidence showing that the Biden FBI and Justice
Department were spying on the Trump campaign. Michael Caputo, a
campaign advisor, used his emails to help devise strategy for the
Trump campaign, and the Biden gang was rooting through it all.

We filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits
[[link removed]]
against the U.S. Department of Justice and the Office of the Director
of National Intelligence after the agencies failed to respond
adequately to requests for records regarding the investigation of
former Trump campaign adviser and communications strategist Michael
Caputo
[[link removed]]
(_Judicial
Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice_
[[link removed]
_(No.
1:25-cv-02631)), (_Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice_
[[link removed]
_(No.
1:25-cv-01903)), (_Judicial Watch Inc. v. Office of the Director of
National Intelligence_
[[link removed]
_(No.
1:25-cv-02469)).

We submitted the requests in response to information that Caputo’s
email was the subject of a secret search warrant of his Google email
account in September 2023, three weeks after he began working for the
Trump 2024 presidential campaign. (Dan Scavino, another Trump campaign
adviser and current White House aide, also disclosed he was targeted
by a similar secret subpoeana.)

We sued
[[link removed]]
the
Justice Department, FBI, and ODNI after the agencies failed to
adequately respond to FOIA requests for records about the targeting of
Caputo, including:

> All investigative reports, memoranda, intelligence products,
> interview transcripts and summaries, or similar records regarding
> Mr. Michael Caputo.
>
> All subpoenas and other requests for information submitted to,
> records received from, and records of communication with
> Google/Alphabet, Inc. or any other search engine or social media
> company regarding Mr. Michael Caputo.
>
> All records of communication between any official or employee of the
> four Justice Department components and any official or employee of
> any other branch, department, agency, or office of the Federal
> government regarding or mentioning Mr. Michael Caputo.

Caputo, as he detailed in a March 28, 2019, op-ed
[[link removed]],
said he received death threats and drained his bank accounts after he
became “ensnared by the congressional and special counsel
investigations” into alleged Trump-Russia collusion.

Our lawsuits show that the lawfare and spying against Trump never
really ended but was only paused. These records can’t be released
soon enough.

In June 2025, we sued
[[link removed]]
the Justice
Department for records regarding Biden era Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act (FISA) subpoenas, warrants, court orders and other
authorizations obtained to surveil President Trump.

We were instrumental in uncovering much of what the public knows about
“Russiagate,” which involved a long list of Democratic political
figures, lawyers, and staffers who shaped the narrative around the
Trump-Russia hoax.

In August 2018, the Justice Department admitted in a court filing that
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court held no hearings
[[link removed]]
on the FISA spy warrant applications targeting Carter Page, a former
Trump campaign part-time advisor who was the subject of four
controversial FISA warrants.

In July 2018, we released records
[[link removed]]
about FISA warrants targeting Page, which appeared to confirm that the
FBI and DOJ misled the FISA court by withholding material information
showing that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the DNC were behind the
“intelligence” used to persuade the court to approve the FISA
warrants targeting the Trump team.

In October 2020, we uncovered
[[link removed]]
heavily redacted email communications among top-level State Department
officials and a U.S. ambassador expressing skepticism about reports by
Christopher Steele’s London-based private intelligence firm Orbis
Business Intelligence. (Steele was the author of the Clinton-funded,
anti-Trump dossier.) The emails show one assistant secretary of state
saying some of Steele’s reports sound “extreme” and others “do
not ring true,” while the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine called some of
the Steele reports “flaky.”

In April 2020, we obtained emails
[[link removed]]
between former FBI official Peter Strzok and former FBI attorney Lisa
Page, including an email dated January 10, 2017, in which Strzok said
that the version of the dossier published by _BuzzFeed_ was
“identical” to the version given to the FBI by McCain and had
“differences” from the dossier provided to the FBI by Fusion GPS
co-founder Glenn Simpson and _Mother Jones_ reporter David Corn.
January 10, 2017, is the same day _BuzzFeed_ published the anti-Trump
dossier by former British spy Christopher Steele. The emails also show
Strzok and other FBI agents mocking President Trump a few weeks before
he was inaugurated. In addition, the emails revealed that Strzok
communicated with then-Deputy Director Andrew McCabe about the “leak
investigation” tied to the Clinton Foundation (the very leak in
which McCabe was later implicated).

In September 2019, we released State Department records
[[link removed]]
revealing that Steele had an extensive and close working relationship
dating back to May of 2014 with high-ranking Obama State Department
officials including Jonathan Winer and Victoria Nuland.

In August 2019, we obtained “302” report material
[[link removed]]
from 2016 FBI interviews of Associate Deputy U.S. Attorney Bruce Ohr,
who was removed from his position in December 2017. (A Form 302 is
used by FBI agents to memorialize interviews they undertake during an
investigation.) In a November 22, 2016, interview, Ohr said that
“reporting on Trump’s ties to Russia were going to the Clinton
Campaign, Jon Winer at the U.S. State Department and the FBI.” In a
late September 2016 interview, Ohr described a person (likely
Christopher Steele) as “desperate that Donald Trump not get elected
and was passionate about him not being the U.S. President.” “Ohr
knew that [Fusion GPS’s] Glen Simpson and others talking to Victoria
Nuland at the U.S. State Department.”

In July 2019, we obtained records
[[link removed]]
revealing a September 2016 email exchange between Nuland and Winer,
discussing a “face-to-face” meeting on a “Russian matter.”

Until next week,



[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


[advertisement]
[[link removed]]


[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024

202.646.5172



© 2017 - 2025, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

View in browser
[[link removed]]