From xxxxxx <[email protected]>
Subject Sounds Like the Plan: The Historical Roots of the Takeover of D.C.
Date August 29, 2025 12:15 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[[link removed]]

SOUNDS LIKE THE PLAN: THE HISTORICAL ROOTS OF THE TAKEOVER OF D.C.  
[[link removed]]


 

Rick Massimo
August 24, 2025
Forget I Said Anything
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed].]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ The capital has for most of its history been a
largely-to-mostly-Black city run by open racists. This takeover by
white federal officials is something many in the Black community have
been anticipating for decades. There’s even a name for it-The Plan _


A protest encampment outside Union Station.,

 

The federal military occupation of Washington, D.C., where I live, is
finishing up its second week, with no signs of abating. Indeed, the
plan is for more National Guard troops to descend upon the heavily
Democratic District from regions supportive of President Donald Trump.

Trump, for his part, continues to let loose with unhinged,
dementia-influenced rants threatening the city with armed Guard
members and even regular troops. He’s also threatened Mayor Muriel
Bowser [[link removed]] and other
city officials for the sin of pointing out that the occupation is
built on a 180-degree lie about crime statistics, something
even Trump’s own press secretary acknowledged
[[link removed]] before presumably
receiving the memo.

(It’s important to interject here that the National Guard troops I
spoke with last week were members of the D.C. National Guard. They
live here; they know the score, and while they couldn’t tell me
straight up “We know this is all BS,” their voices and half-smiles
made it clear.)

I knew before I started helping with the editing of Georgetown
University history professor Maurice Jackson’s _Halfway to
Freedom_, a magisterial history of Black people in D.C. (coming out
next year from the Duke University Press), that the capital had for
most of its history been a largely-to-mostly-Black city run by open
racists. What I didn’t know is that this kind of takeover by white
federal officials is something many in the Black community have been
anticipating for decades. There’s even a name for it: The Plan.

Essentially, the theory goes that whites sooner or later would simply
not let a major city, the capital of the U.S., be run by Black people.
As soon as Trump announced his invasion of the District, concocted a
day in advance on the way to one of his golf courses
[[link removed]],
it sounded like The Plan was going into action. I had to ask Jackson
whether he was seeing the same pattern I was, and he replied that the
Plan has been in effect in some way, shape or form for centuries.

“Well, you know, ever since Blacks were brought here as enslaved
people, there was always a plan,” Jackson says. “And the plan was
to keep them in slavery.”

The entire cycle that ran in the United States in the 1860s and 1870s
— the end of Civil War and slavery; Reconstruction and a brief
glimpse of equal access to power; the revocation of that power — all
happened in D.C. as well, Jackson explained. Enslaved Black people in
D.C. were freed in 1862 by the Compensated Emancipation Act (the
slaves weren’t compensated; the owners were, which is indefensible
morally though it did result in a peaceful emancipation); in 1870,
when Black people had the potential to vote, the D.C. government was
reorganized so that instead of an elected mayor, the president
appointed a governor and 11 members of the D.C. Council, while the
other 11 members of the council were elected.

Even that didn’t last very long: By 1878, D.C. was overseen by three
presidentially appointed commissioners and run by a committee of the
House for nearly 100 years, even after the District became a
majority-Black city in 1957.

The House Committee on the District was made up overwhelmingly of
white Southern congressmen, who brought their Dixie racial attitudes
to bear on the increasingly Black D.C. John McMillan, from South
Carolina, who signed the Southern Manifesto opposing integration in
1956, was chairman of the committee for decades, starting in the
1940s. He stood in the way of all propositions to give the
District’s residents, Black and white, a hand in the running of
their own city, whether it be by having a vote in Congress or by truly
electing a mayor and council.

President Lyndon Johnson undertook a reorganization of the D.C.
government. Walter Washington was appointed as mayor in 1967, and
finally Congress passed the Home Rule Act in 1973; the District held
elections for mayor (Washington won) and a council in 1974.

‘Somebody Was Out to Get Them’

The Plan was first detailed by Doug Moore, one of the founders along
with Julius Hobson and Marion Barry of the Free DC movement — which
is having a revival in the face of the current takeover. It started in
1965 with a bus boycott and spread to protest discriminatory laws and
business practices in D.C. Even some Black organizations weren’t on
board, but it gave the District’s plight a visibility and a rallying
point.

“African Americans always knew that somebody was out to get them,”
Jackson says. “And now you have this president, and it's obvious
that he has a Plan. It's obvious that in Project 2025 there was a
Plan, and we see it coming out every day, especially as it goes to
disenfranchise African American people and trying to overthrow the
Home Rule Act of 1973.”

The Plan worked in economic ways as well: While the D.C. Chamber of
Commerce was a largely Black institution for much of the 1960s and
1970s, the D.C. Board of Trade was a business organization dedicated
to the preservation of white economic dominance, Jackson says.

“The whites had the Board of Trade, and the Blacks had the Chamber
of Commerce,” Jackson says. “And the Board of Trade had these
programs in order to keep political power within itself … not
allowing African Americans to get loans, to get businesses. The trade
unions were involved in it, which meant that they didn't allow any
Blacks in the union movements.”

(In looking through Jackson’s references, I came across mention of
The Plan
[[link removed]] in _The
Washington Post_ in 1997. It’s a remarkable piece, primarily in the
way that the writer believes they’re disproving the existence of The
Plan while in fact proving it — especially reading it now with
hindsight. It was written in response to the federal takeover of
D.C.’s schools and budget, and takes an incredulous tone at the
notion that the District is being turned into the Manhattan of the
area while Prince George’s County is being turned into the analog of
Harlem — something that’s clearly coming to pass.)

Precedent

Jackson points out that this occupation of D.C. is not unprecedented.
In 1919, D.C. was part of the Red Summer riots, in which whites
attacked Black people in cities across the U.S. Jackson points out
that in D.C., as long as only Black people were in danger, President
Woodrow Wilson did nothing, but when Black people, especially World
War I veterans with combat and weapons experience, secured weapons and
began defending their neighborhoods, Wilson declared an emergency,
“and then he called in the troops.”

In 1968, federal troops were deployed to D.C. in response to the
uprising over the killing of Martin Luther King Jr., and after a few
days they were armed, though they weren’t responsible for any of the
eight or nine deaths during those days. The Guard was also called out
during the search for D.C. Sniper John Muhammad in 2002. “This is
not the first time,” Jackson says.

(He’s right, of course; at the same time, while you can debate and
criticize the other deployments, they were at least in response to
real events and not the desperate attempts of a rapidly declining
president to make his supporters forget he’s a pedophile.)

So What Can Be Done?

As Jackson points out, Mayor Bowser’s hands are somewhat tied in
this. She’s caught between the indignation that should accompany
this occupation and the day-to-day needs of District residents under a
president and Congress who aren’t going anywhere anytime soon.
Certain members of the D.C. Council — he singles out at-large member
Christina Henderson — are rallying residents and officials in
opposition.

The real solution, of course, is statehood. D.C. statehood has been on
the back burner for decades — sometimes it’s been a platform plank
for the Democratic Party; sometimes it hasn’t been — but it’s
the only permanent solution for the problem. Of course, the path to
statehood goes through the very Republican Congress that benefits from
the District’s second-class status.

“Edward Kennedy was probably one of the greatest friends that D.C.
has ever had in the Congress,” Jackson says. “He said don't want
D.C. statehood because they think it will be too black, too
Democratic, too urban and too poor.”

But there’s another reaction I hope can be put into motion.

I mentioned above that John McMillan ran the House committee that ran
D.C. for years — about 20 years at a stretch, about 30 in total.
That changed when Walter Fauntroy came along.

The District’s non-voting representative in the House, Fauntroy
“developed something he called the arithmetic of power,” Jackson
says: While District residents couldn’t vote in South Carolina, they
could help organize, heading down in person when and wherever
possible. And it worked: “They voted Macmillan out of office. And
this had a big impact — with a new head of the District Committee,
it meant that somebody was going to respect the rights of the elected
mayor.”

Jackson points out that as long as Republicans control the House, the
Government Oversight Committee, which even today has veto power over
D.C.’s laws and budget, will be chaired by a Republican. But with
control of the House on a razor’s edge and a president’s party
generally facing headwinds in midterm elections, every seat could
help.

Scott Perry, R-Pennsylvania, is on the committee and is widely
considered one of the most vulnerable Republicans in Congress. Without
a legitimate House seat for us in the District to run for or elect,
our money, organizational skills and anger could be put to good use
trying to unseat him. You could even call the effort The McMillan
Project.

Just putting the idea out there, free of charge. Because the
alternative is on display in the streets of D.C. right now, and as
satisfying as yelling at masked ICE thugs must be (I’ve spent the
last two Monday afternoon/evenings looking for one without success),
it won’t suffice.

_[RICK MASSIMO is the author of I Got a Song: A History of the Newport
Folk Festival (Wesleyan University Press) and A Walking Tour of the
Georgetown Set (Lyons Press). He’s the assistant editor at US Chess
and a former digital writer and senior copy editor at WTOP. He’s a
freelance editor, working with book manuscripts, essays and articles
from published and unpublished writers, as well as co-leader of two
musical projects: The Canonical Set and The Empirical Brothers. You
can get in touch with Rick at [email protected] ]_

* Washington DC
[[link removed]]
* Federal troops
[[link removed]]
* National Guard
[[link removed]]
* Rep. Dennis Kucinich
[[link removed]]
* Trump 2.0
[[link removed]]
* ICE
[[link removed]]
* crime
[[link removed]]
* police state
[[link removed]]
* DC
[[link removed]]
* DC statehood
[[link removed]]
* DC home rule
[[link removed]]
* Racism
[[link removed]]
* slavery
[[link removed]]
* African Americans
[[link removed]]
* GOP
[[link removed]]
* MAGA
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed].]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis