Here are a couple of stories that don’t paint Fox News in a good light.
This all comes from newly unredacted court documents made public this week. The voting technology company Smartmatic has filed a $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox over its 2020 election coverage.
First, The Washington Post’s Jeremy Barr reports: “Jeanine Pirro bragged about helping Trump and GOP while a Fox News host.”
Pirro is now the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. But back in September 2020, she was a weekend host on Fox News. According to the court documents, Pirro texted Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel, “I work so hard for the party across the country. I’m the Number 1 watched show on all news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and party.”
Barr wrote, “Smartmatic included many of the conversations in 468 pages of filings to bolster its contention that Pirro and other Fox hosts were determined to stay on Trump’s good side for a variety of motives. It said Pirro, a longtime friend of the president, sought to secure a pardon for her ex-husband, Albert Pirro. Convicted earlier of tax evasion and conspiracy, Albert Pirro was the last person Trump pardoned during his first term.”
The documents also showed that, at one point, Pirro’s producer, Jerry Andrews, told Pirro to stay away from claims of election fraud. He wrote to her, “You should be very careful with this stuff and protect yourself given the ongoing calls for evidence that has not materialized.”
Check out Barr’s story for more details, but in a statement to the Post, Fox News said, “The evidence shows that Smartmatic’s business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump’s lawyers on Fox News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech. Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic’s executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.”
Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal’s Isabella Simonetti wrote, “Smartmatic Case Documents Show Some Fox News Hosts’ Drive to Help Trump.”
Simonetti wrote, “The documents show at least two Fox hosts were in touch with Sidney Powell, a lawyer at the center of Trump’s postelection efforts, and one urged her to come on air.”
According to the documents, Fox Business Network host Maria Bartiromo messaged Powell on Nov. 17, 2020, and wrote, “Sidney we must keep you out there. I am very worried. Please please please overturn this. Bring the evidence. I know you can.”
Another Fox Business host, Lou Dobbs, texted Powell on Nov. 7, 2020: “It’s up to us – we few!” He also texted, “Meanwhile I’m going to do what I can — to help stop what is now a coup d’etat in final days — perhaps moments” of Trump’s first term. (Fox canceled Dobbs’ show in February 2021 and Dobbs died in July of 2024 at the age of 78.)
Who knows how this will play out in court — if it even gets to court. Either way, on-air hosts openly advocating to help Trump win an election that he clearly lost is a bad look for a supposed news organization.
What do Americans want in their news?
What do Americans want from their news providers? Three things: honesty, intelligence and authenticity. That’s among the results of the latest poll from the Pew Research Center.
More than 80% of 9,300 U.S. adults said it was “important” that the people they get their news from display those three traits in their work.
My Poynter colleague, Angela Fu, wrote, “Though Pew defined authenticity in news providers as ‘being their true selves,’ people who participated in focus groups for the study were less unified in their opinions of what it meant for a journalist or news provider to be authentic.”
Senior researcher and lead report author Kirsten Eddy told Fu, “Some people would refer to that as sort of being their true selves and bringing their humanity to the forefront. Some people thought of it as things like truthfulness, specifically, whether they’re being honest and accurate and truthful with you. And some people were kind of confused. They knew the word mattered, but they weren’t entirely sure what it means.”
Another interesting part of the survey was this: “Most Americans (79%) agree that someone who writes for a newspaper or news website is a journalist — higher than the share who say the same about someone who reports on TV (65%), radio (59%) or any other medium.”
The report went on to say, “There is less consensus about whether people who work in newer media are journalists. Fewer than half of U.S. adults say someone who hosts a news podcast (46%), writes their own newsletter about news (40%) or posts about news on social media (26%) is a journalist. In each of these cases, roughly a quarter of Americans say they aren’t sure whether these people are journalists.”
It then added, “This pattern aligns somewhat with how long each format has been around: Newspapers were associated with journalism for centuries before any of the more modern media existed.”
Reserving a fact check
On Wednesday, U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, the former governor of North Dakota, went on Fox Business and claimed that restaurant reservations in Washington, D.C., are up 30% since Trump sent in the National Guard to patrol the streets of D.C.
He got no pushback. But what he said wasn’t true. Not even close.
According to restaurant booking data, reservations in D.C. are way down compared to the same time last year. Fox5 in Washington, D.C., reported, “Beginning Monday, Aug. 11, seated diners in the District dropped by 16%. The largest drop off was last Wednesday, when the number of diners dipped by 31%. This was just two days after Trump ordered the National Guard to patrol the streets of Washington.”
It added, “Additionally, as of Aug. 17, D.C. is the only city among the 20 largest in the country tracked by OpenTable that's experienced a decline in reservations from August 2024.”
The Washington Post’s Tim Carman and Warren Rojas reported, “Business owners are concerned that the continued surge in law enforcement could impact their revenue during a vital period of the summer.”
Look, I get it. It’s sometimes hard for a newscast to fact-check someone in real time. But when Burgum threw out the stunning (and false) number that he did, it should’ve at least been questioned. Even if you don't know the actual fact in front of you, those interviewing Burgum should’ve at least followed up by asking where he was getting that number that he clearly just blindly threw out there.
Trump joins TikTok