[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Bombing People Is Not Feminist, No Matter How You Spin It Alan MacLeod ([link removed])


Fox: US Air Force pilot call sign 'Banzai' becomes first woman to fly F-35A stealth fighter into combat

Fox News (6/12/20 ([link removed]) ) noted that Capt. Emily "Thompson had an all-female maintenance crew to launch her historic flight."

Have you heard the good news, ladies? You too can bomb the Middle East!

Some corporate media have recently been taken with the “inspirational” story of Emily Thompson, the first woman to pilot the super-costly ([link removed]) F-35 jet in combat. At an unspecified time earlier this month, Thompson took off from her base in the United Arab Emirates to bomb an unnamed country.

The New York Post (6/13/20 ([link removed]) ) described her as “breaking the glass ceiling—at lightning speed.” Other outlets used the words “historic” (Fox News, 6/12/20 ([link removed]) ), “awesome” (Australian, 6/15/20 ([link removed]) ) and “empowering” (Jerusalem Post, 6/11/20 ([link removed]) ) to describe the event. “What an inspiration,” concluded Unilad (6/12/20 ([link removed]) ).

Thompson’s ground crew was also all-female, a number of outlets reported, with the International Business Times (6/13/20 ([link removed]) ) including a quote from her bomb loader, telling young girls: “Be confident and never let anyone tell you that you can’t do something because you can."

The story was picked up primarily in the military press (e.g.,Task and Purpose, 6/10/20 ([link removed]) ; Air Force Times, 6/11/20 ([link removed]) ) and in more conservative media (Breitbart, 6/13/20 ([link removed]) ; Epoch Times, 6/16/20 ([link removed]) ), with notable right-wing figures like Ivanka Trump (Twitter, 6/14/20 ([link removed]) ) and Fox anchor Martha MacCallum (Twitter, 6/15/20 ([link removed]) ) hailing the event as a step forward for women.

Many of the reports gave background about Thompson’s life, the cost of the F-35 and other military matters. But none questioned whether this was really a victory for equality, nor the ethics of nearly two decades of continuous US warfare and occupation in the region. The effect was to use the language of social justice to cloak the violence of wars in the Middle East, which were started under false pretexts (FAIR.org, 3/19/07 ([link removed]) , 7/6/16 ([link removed]) ) and have killed huge numbers ([link removed]) of women, men and children.
CNBC: Women head the top three CIA directorates for the first time in history

CNBC (1/16/19 ([link removed]) ) reported that after Gina Haspel became director of the CIA, the agency "celebrated its progress towards gender parity." Haspel was confirmed by the Senate despite overseeing torture and destroying evidence of the CIA's torture program (FAIR.org, 6/6/19 ([link removed]) ).

While Thompson’s story was primarily retold by conservative media, outlets with more liberal audiences have also put a progressive face on inherently violent, oppressive institutions. Last year, CNBC (1/16/19 ([link removed]) ) essentially presented the CIA as a feminist institution, now that women head its key directorates for the first time, while many outlets (ABC News, 7/13/18 ([link removed]) ; LA Times, 8/8/18 ([link removed]) ; The Week, 1/2/19 ([link removed]) ; MSNBC, 1/3/20 ([link removed]) ) cheered the news that four of the five largest weapons manufacturers were headed by female CEOs.

Politico (1/2/19 ([link removed]) ) described the news women now headed the major weapon-producing corporations as a “watershed” moment in what “has always been a male-dominated bastion.” Women “knocked down” the barriers of machismo, the outlet declared, quoting individuals who praised the defense industry as a “meritocracy” that now “generally rewards high performers regardless of color or creed or gender.” The piece, headlined “How Women Took Over the Military/Industrial Complex,” included a section entitled “questioning orthodoxy,” but at no point did it examine the unstated Washington orthodoxy that endless wars ([link removed]) are necessary, a premise that industry depends on.

The term “military/industrial complex” was popularized by President Dwight Eisenhower in his farewell address ([link removed]) to the nation, where he warned that weapons contractors were beginning to dictate state policy for their own benefit:

Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government...we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military/industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

That this structure still exists, reaping untold violence across the world, only it is now headed by women, is hardly a step forward for feminism, which is about the emancipation of billions from an oppressive system that hurts everyone.
------------------------------------------------------------

Featured image: MSNBC graphic (1/3/20 ([link removed]) ) celebrating female heads of weapon-making corporations and military agencies.
Read more ([link removed])

© 2020 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .