Nevada Sex Trafficking Lawsuit: What are the Implications of the Judge's Recent Ruling?
Historically, when survivors of sexual abuse and exploitation make their names public, they are met with harassment, blame, challenges to their credibility, and sometimes even violent threats to their life. In recent history, we've seen this behavior on display in response to sexual abuse claims involving powerful male public figures like the Tate brothers and Sean "Diddy" Combs.
The risk of retaliation is especially heightened for survivors of sex trafficking, who are often dealing with organized criminals. Further, sex traffickers endure serial rape at the hands of sex buyers, and are therefore at risk from not one abuser, but from hundreds – and sometimes thousands.
For these reasons, survivors of sex trafficking do not typically have to reveal their identities to the public in order to pursue charges in court. Except, apparently, in Nevada.
In Nevada, a judge has ruled that a survivor of sex trafficking, who has been pseudonymized as “Jane Doe,” must now disclose her identity to the public if she wishes to move the case forward. The implications of this ruling could be disastrous for survivors everywhere.
Read more about this dangerous ruling and what we have to do to tackle it!