Sharp analysis. Clear commentary. California focus. Every Single Day.*Breaking News* New Politico Survey Has Newsom’s Play For Mid-Decade Redistricting of House Lines In Big TroubleA new Politico–Citrin Center survey finds strong opposition to shifting redistricting power from California’s independent commission to the Legislature.
⏱️ 3 minute read New Polling Data Released - 64% Support Commissions WorkThis morning Politico released new survey data showing California Governor Gavin Newsom’s Redistricting Gambit in trouble. Last week in an in-depth analysis, I said that there were four (and a half) things that could stop Newsom’s partisan plans to redraw California’s Congressional lines mid-decade. The first one I listed was bad polling. Here’s exactly what I wrote in that section:
Well, today Newsom got a dose of bad news. Politico’s New Survey NumbersA Politico–Citrin Center–Possibility Lab survey, released August 14, shows 64 percent of California voters want to keep the independent redistricting commission in place. Only 36 percent want to give the Legislature authority to draw the maps—even temporarily. Among independents, opposition jumps to 72 percent. These are not small margins. When asked plainly, voters across party lines show a clear default position: they don’t want politicians drawing political maps. Here’s the exact question Politico asked:
Where You Want to Start in the PollsIf you’re launching a statewide ballot measure, you want to start well above 50 percent—at least in the high 50s or low 60s—to have a reasonable shot at passing. That’s because support almost always erodes as voters hear more about a measure and as the opposition makes its case. In a “naked” special election—one where it’s the only item on the ballot—the turnout will be extremely low, and the electorate will skew toward the most motivated voters. That makes a strong starting point even more critical. Newsom’s starting point doesn’t clear that bar. In fact, it’s not even close. With Polling, The Devil Is in the DetailsOne important caveat: this is not necessarily how voters would see the measure on the ballot. In California, when the Legislature puts something on the ballot, it writes the title and the summary—language that will almost always be tilted to help it pass. Politico’s question might be what a true non-biased question would look like. On the ballot, expect Newsom’s side to frame it in the most favorable way possible. That will nudge numbers upward. It’s also unclear whether this survey accounted for the kind of ultra-low turnout we’d see in a stand-alone, off-year special election. The voters who show up for that are not the same mix you’d get in a presidential or gubernatorial election A National Chess Match That California Voters Don’t Seem To Want to PlayThis is part of the larger, ongoing national chess match over redistricting. Republican-controlled states like Texas can redraw congressional maps whenever they want. California, by contrast, handed that power to an independent redistricting commission years ago—and according to this polling, most voters here want to keep it that way. At least the “uniformed” voter, before being barraged with a combination of biased information coming from the state via the ballot, and a bunch of political advertising both for and against the Constitutional amendment. The Week Ahead: Maps… And A Vote?This battle is at the center of California politics right now. Supposedly, “the maps” of what they might do could drop in the coming days, and the legislature only has a short window to actually try to place something on the ballot. And of course while polling was the first potential hurdle I identified on my analysis last week, there are three and a half other hurdles still ahead… So, Does It Matter? - with Jon Fleischman is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Jon that his writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless he enables payments. |