[[link removed]]

VLADIMIR PUTIN COULD BE LAYING A TRAP  
[[link removed]]


 

Jonathan Lemire
August 12, 2025
The Atlantic
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ Donald Trump badly wants a deal to end the war in Ukraine. What is
he willing to give up? _

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Helsinki in 2018., Reuters

 

Vladimir Putin has had a tough few months. His military’s
much-feared summer offensive has made incremental gains in Ukraine but
not nearly the advances he had hoped. His economy has sputtered.
Donald Trump has grown fed up
[[link removed]] with
Putin’s repeated defiance of his calls for a cease-fire and, for the
first time, has targeted the Russian president with consistently harsh
rhetoric. Last week, Trump slapped one of Russia’s major trading
partners, India, with sanctions.

Putin needs to buy time to change the trajectory of the conflict. So
the former KGB spymaster has given Trump something that the U.S.
president has wanted for months: a one-on-one summit
[[link removed]] to
discuss the end of the conflict. Trump leaped at the chance. But as
the two men prepare to meet in Alaska
[[link removed]] on
Friday, foreign-policy experts—and Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelensky—are warning that Trump could be walking into a trap that
the Russian leader is setting on American soil.

“Putin has already won. He is the leader of a rogue state, and
he’ll get a picture on U.S. soil with the president of the United
States,” John Bolton, one of Trump’s former national security
advisers, told me. “Trump wants a deal. And if he can’t get one
now, he may walk away from it entirely.”

Putin has shown no sign of compromising his positions. His demands to
reach an end to hostilities remain maximalist: He wants Russia to keep
the territory it conquered, and Ukraine to forgo the security
guarantees that could prevent Moscow from attacking again. Those terms
are nonstarters for Ukraine and the European nations that have rallied
to its defense.

Having promised an end to the war during his campaign, Trump, above
all, is desperate for the fighting to stop, and observers fear that,
as a result, he might agree to Putin’s terms regardless of what
Ukraine wants. Trump has already said in recent days that Russia and
Ukraine will need to “swap lands” (without specifying which ones).
But it is not clear that Russia is willing to give up anything. And if
Zelensky were to reject a deal, no matter how one-sided it might be,
in Trump’s mind, Kyiv would suddenly be the primary obstacle to
peace. That could lead Trump to once again unleash his wrath on
Zelensky, with potentially disastrous consequences for Ukraine’s
ability to keep fighting the war.

“Clearly Putin’s strategy is to delay and play the president:
string him along, concede nothing, exclude Zelensky,” Democratic
Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, who sits on the Armed
Services Committee, told me. “My preeminent fear is a bad deal that
Zelensky rejects, and then he becomes the bad guy, and that then
Trump, once again in his classic mixture of vengeance and vanity, will
turn against Ukraine.”

Trump has made clear that he wants peace. He also wants a Nobel Peace
Prize. Several of his closest allies have told me that the fact that
President Barack Obama received one infuriates Trump. He has taken to
declaring that he has “ended six wars” in his second
term. Fact-checkers say
[[link removed]] this
claim is exaggerated, though it’s true that his administration has
focused on global hot spots in recent weeks, receiving acclaim for
brokering peace agreements between Cambodia and Thailand, India and
Pakistan, and Azerbaijan and Armenia. The world’s most high-profile
conflicts, in Gaza and in Ukraine, however, have only escalated in
recent months. The situation in Gaza appears to be deteriorating, and
Trump has not done anything to stop Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu’s controversial plan to occupy Gaza.

So Trump sees an opportunity with Ukraine. The bloodiest war in Europe
since World War II has become deadlier this year, and the warring
sides have expanded their arsenals with weapons capable of striking
deep into enemy territory.

The White House dismissed the notion that Trump could be outfoxed by
Putin. “What have any of these so-called foreign policy
‘experts’ ever accomplished in their lives, other than criticizing
Donald Trump?” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told me
in a statement. “President Trump has solved seven global conflicts
in six months, and he has made extensive progress in ending the
Russia-Ukraine War, which he inherited from our foolish previous
president, Joe Biden.” Some Trump allies believe that he will stand
up to Putin, and that he is appropriately skeptical of the Russian
leader. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, for instance,
invoked the Cold War when he posted on social media on Friday that he
was “confident President Trump will walk away – like Reagan – if
Putin insists on a bad deal.”

Trump has been burned by Putin before. In recent months, the president
has complained that Putin would tell him one thing in their phone
calls and then act entirely differently on the battlefield. Trump
reiterated that complaint to reporters yesterday at the White House.
“I believe he wants to get it over with,” Trump said of Putin.
“Now, I’ve said that a few times, and I’ve been disappointed.
Because I’d have a good call with him and then missiles would be
lobbed into Kyiv or some other place, and you’d have 60 people
laying on a road dying.”

The summit was thrown together so quickly that, with days to go, U.S.
officials are still scrambling to finalize the details. Trump
yesterday characterized the summit as “a feel-out meeting,”
perhaps hinting that no final deal would be reached in Alaska. That
was taken as a hopeful sign by some who are skeptical of having the
summit at all. “The least-bad outcome is that the men would have an
exchange of views, but that Trump would stay noncommittal and no deal
would be reached. That would be okay, even perhaps a small first
step,” Richard Haass, who worked in three Republican administrations
before leading the Council on Foreign Relations, told me. “The fear
is that the president wants an agreement too much and will carry far
too much of Moscow’s water.”

But if history is any indication, Putin might be able to use the
summit to again curry Trump’s favor. Several times in both his first
and second terms, Trump followed up a meeting or call with Putin by
repeating Kremlin talking points. Most infamously, this occurred
during a 2018 summit with Putin in Helsinki
[[link removed]],
when I asked Trump if he believed U.S. intelligence agencies’
conclusion that Russia had interfered in the 2016 U.S. election. And
yesterday, after Putin had signaled his interest in the summit, Trump
took a swipe at Zelensky, who has strenuously objected to giving any
territory to Russia and has noted that the Ukrainian constitution
requires that any cession of land must be done by national vote.“I
get along with Zelensky. But you know, I disagree with what he’s
done. Very, very severely disagree. This is a war that should have
never happened,” Trump told reporters in the White House briefing
room. “I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelensky was saying,
‘Well, I have to get constitutional approval.’ I mean, he’s got
approval to go into war and kill everybody.”

Since his blow-up with Trump in the Oval Office in February and
Washington’s brief pause on intelligence sharing with Kyiv, Zelensky
has tried to remain on Trump’s good side, with some success. He
managed to secure a positive one-on-one meeting with Trump on the
sidelines of Pope Francis’s funeral at the Vatican in late April.
And he has refrained from criticizing the president by name when
voicing reservations about U.S. policy toward Ukraine, including a
weapons pause in June. Although he has expressed dismay at being
excluded from the Alaska summit, Zelensky has not gone after Trump.
“We understand Russia’s intention to try to deceive America—we
will not allow this,” Zelensky said in an address to his nation on
Sunday.

Originally, Trump agreed to the Putin summit under the condition that
a second meeting would be held with both Putin and Zelensky. But the
Kremlin balked at that plan, and Trump dropped it. Trump said
yesterday that he would instead brief European leaders shortly after
the summit, potentially even from Air Force One on the flight back to
Washington. He also will partake in a virtual meeting
[[link removed]] with
leaders, including Zelensky, this week before heading to Alaska.

Europe has watched the summit run-up warily. Several European nations
have vowed to fortify Ukraine with weapons if the United States bows
out of the conflict. Vice President J. D. Vance, one of the
administration’s loudest isolationist voices, this weekend declared
[[link removed]],
“We’re done with the funding of the Ukraine war business” and
said the United States would soon only be willing to sell arms to
Europe to give to Ukraine. But Europe seems unlikely to be able to
sustain the level of arms and intelligence that Ukraine would need to
defend itself. And if Putin manages to secure a victory in Ukraine, he
could soon look to expand his war aims elsewhere.

All of which heightens the stakes of the summit in Alaska. “Putin
kept pushing Trump and eventually went further than Trump was willing
to be pushed. He got mad, so Putin gave him this summit,” Bolton
told me. “Now he wants to work his KGB magic on Trump and get him
back in line.”

_Jonathan Lemire
[[link removed]] is a staff
writer at The Atlantic._

* Alaska Summit
[[link removed]]
* Trump
[[link removed]]
* Putin
[[link removed]]
* Ukraine invasion
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]