Unsanitized: The COVID-19 Report for June 27, 2020

The Reason Why Donald Trump Will Lose Is Important
Turns out you can't BS your way through a crisis.

 

The president is fading away. (Yuri Gripas/Sipa via AP Images)

First Response

Liberals are in a permanent shell-shocked condition over the results of
the last election, after losing to someone known to America primarily as
a reality game-show host. They have presumed that Trump carries some
gut-level cunning and appeal, or fear the string-pulling of outside
intervention, and they refuse to interpret whatever data is presented in
front of them. They're terrified to say the words.

Elections cannot be met with complacency. There's the old adage of
acting like you're down by ten points. Downballot races take on even
more significance in 2020, not just because of the bid to take back the
Senate but because it's a Census year, and the state legislatures that
will be elected will have significant control (depending on the state)
over redistricting. So if you want better leaders, work like hell to get
them in the next four months. And yes, win big enough so it can't be
stolen. Don't let me stop you.

But I'm not afraid to say this: Donald Trump is going to lose, and
it's critical to understand why. Not just for history, but for the
next occupant(s) of the office to internalize.

Baseline polling can lead us to this conclusion. The respected Siena
poll put the snapshot this week at Biden 50, Trump 36
,
with Biden ahead among men, tied among white voters, and dominant among
white voters with at least some college education. In the states the
numbers are generally the same
,
with Biden sporting double-digit leads in the tipping point states he
needs to win. The 538 average, which stuffs and weights all polls
together, still has Biden ahead by 9.3 points
,
and notes that Hillary Clinton's average lead in the four months
leading up to the election was only 4 points
.
The Electoral College still has a Republican lean, but it's
converging: Biden is up in 538's average by 8.1 points in Pennsylvania
,
the tipping point state, only a point away from his overall lead.

But I'm not basing my prediction solely on polling. And I wasn't
someone who publicly claimed that Clinton would triumph in 2016. The
main reason I say Trump will lose is that he's bad at being president,
and with the coronavirus he's found a way to be bad in public. 

Read all of our Unsanitized reports here

Click to Support The American Prospect

Despite the alleged all-consuming attention on the Trump presidency, the
bulk of it was idle gossip, the kind of "laugh-and-point" liberalism
that comforted itself in palace intrigue, or one-off expressions of
horror at rollbacks of regulations or unqualified appointees. But it
became clear to me that Trump would lose in February, as cases of
COVID-19 flowed out of China and around the world. I knew that this was
a) a challenge unlike any Trump had previously faced, and that b) he
would fare badly at it, because he's not a good president.

Plenty of leaders have failed during the pandemic. What Andrew Cuomo did
to send sick patients back into nursing homes
was
unforgivable. But I think we can agree that a president has more agency
than anyone else in moments of national crisis. From the very beginning,
Trump tried to push off that responsibility to the states, because of
his aversion to being blamed for anything. But responsible he is, in
numerous ways.

Trump's CDC so botched testing that hundreds of thousands of Americans
were infected before we had the information. He's admitted to
deliberately slowing testing at key points to make the numbers look
better. He actively cheered reopening way too soon and offered no
federal support for states to prepare. The FEMA program of commandeering
and shuffling personal protective equipment was the work of a criminal
gang. His attitude toward the virus was to dismiss its grave
implications, even now

amid the unending first wave. His campaign manager is in quarantine
,
and advance staffers have contracted the disease; his approach is
crumbling around him. And the continual pronouncements of the great job
he's doing, amid 125,000 deaths and untold long-term damage to
people's lungs and their livelihoods, recalls Nero and the fiddle.

Americans habitually reject incompetence in their leaders. Before being
feted as a kindly painter, George W. Bush was the most loathed man in
the country, because he got us bogged down in a war based on lies, let
an American city drown, and presided over a crushing financial crisis.
He was bad at his job, in public. Herbert Hoover was bad at his job as
millions suffered during a presidency shaped by the Depression. The
nation rejected them. They're in the process of rejecting Trump.

There's a way for a hypothetical president to succeed in the next four
months and eke out re-election: universal masking, massive support for
testing and army field hospitals and contact tracing where needed, a
wide-open money spigot to individuals financially affected. It's
actually a pretty simple formula.

Trump won't do it. He's taken the position that everything's fine,
and thinks that moving off that would show weakness. And even if he
wanted to do what might seem simple for a replacement-level president,
he's so far below that standard as to make such steps impossible. This
is why he should, actually, resign, as Chris Hayes called for

yesterday. Instead we'll have to settle for him being snubbed at the
polls in four months.

Trump's entire political career has been built on hucksterism and
grievance. You can fool people with hucksterism for a long time, but not
once slapped by reality
.
Then the sheen wears off. BSing his way through served Trump well in
business, which we're discovering is much more forgiving than
government. But you can only whine for so long, as Biden noted yesterday
, before it
becomes pathetic. Trump can't figure out how to attack the
coronavirus, and without doing that work he cannot attack Biden
.
He knows he's going to lose

(Biden "is going to be president because some people don't love me,
maybe," Trump said to Sean Hannity on Friday), because he's
incapable of the governing that would prevent it.

This is the important point. A president has to be president, not just
play one on TV. They cannot just express competence, but actually
succeed. The difficult truth is that Trump is carrying on a tradition.
We've done very little to arrest our long-term crises for several
decades. The next president needs to actually deal with them. FDR's
descendants wrote an open letter

to Biden, urging outsized ambition to fill in the existing cracks
exposed by this crisis. Passivity-at income and wealth inequality, at
unequal treatment, at structural racism, at a raging pandemic but also
the everyday failures we faced before-will only lead to disapproval
and decline.

So when Biden wins, he needs to salve the festering wound that is
American government, or we'll get another in a series of wave
elections that haven't really ended since 2006. Trump's humiliating
defeat sets the course for Biden's presidency: tangibly govern.

Support Independent, Fact-Checked Journalism

Debit Card Update

Yesterday I wrote about 3.6 million prepaid cards loaded with stimulus
payments had a forced arbitration agreement attached. I was informed
that Rep. Cindy Axne (D-IA) led a group

of nine House Financial Services Committee Democrats (not even those
thought of as the progressives) last month on a letter to Treasury
asking that the mandatory arbitration agreement be removed, among other
things.

The Democrats never heard back.

We Depend on Your Donations

Days Without a Bailout Oversight Chair

[link removed]

92
.

We Can't Do This Without You

Today I Learned

* Personal income dropped in May
because
one-time stimulus checks stopped coming. (Bureau of Economic Analysis)

* Texas closes its bars

and restricts dine-in restaurants as the virus spreads. (Texas Tribune)

* Can't go outside because of coronavirus; can't stay inside

because of no air conditioning and the heat. (CNBC)

* Remember when the reopen movement was the next Tea Party? One of their
leaders has contracted coronavirus
.
(Washington Post)

* Contact tracing has utterly failed

in the U.S. (Axios)

* Five percent of NBA players tested positive
,
a pretty high number considering all were asymptomatic as far as we
know. (Bloomberg)

* An eviction tracking system
. (Eviction Lab)

**Click the social links below to share this newsletter**

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

YOUR TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION SUPPORTS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM

Copyright (C) 2020 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.
_________________

Sent to [email protected]

Unsubscribe:
[link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States