There are some genuine problems with BLS methods. A hack Trump appointee is not the answer.View this email in your browser [link removed]

[link removed]

****AUGUST 13, 2025****

**On the

**Prospect **website**

[link removed]

Laying Siege to Sanctuary Cities [link removed]

Team Trump is fighting another losing battle in the courts, this time over sanctuary jurisdictions. Its argument neglects that cooperation with immigration authorities is optional.

**BY JAMES BARATTA** [link removed]

[link removed]

Establishment Struggles to Maintain Control of California [link removed]

The number one and number two choices of the big-money forces in next year’s governor’s race dropped out. What’s next?

**BY DAVID DAYEN** [link removed]

[link removed]

The Museum of the Trump Resistance [link removed]

Someday, we will honor those who resisted Donald Trump. But first, we need far more courageous resistance.

**BY ROBERT KUTTNER** [link removed]

****Kuttner on TAP****

**Cooking the inflation and jobs numbers**

**There are some genuine problems with BLS methods. A hack Trump appointee is not the answer.**

Trump’s appointment of a hack loyalist, E.J. Antoni of the Heritage Foundation, to head the Bureau of Labor Statistics could actually lead to some interesting debates if Trump’s goal were not to rig the data. The BLS derives the Consumer Price Index by sampling tens of thousands of actual prices in different parts of the country, and then weighting them to create a “market basket” of typical consumer purchases. To calculate the unemployment rate, the BLS conducts two different surveys, one of households and the other of employers.

Antoni has objected that the BLS often issues major revisions after the initial CPI numbers, because some sources are slower to report than others. Likewise jobs numbers. He recently called for the BLS to issue its own reports quarterly rather than monthly.

More mainstream critics than Antoni have pointed out that the BLS methodology is outmoded in an era when large retailers keep all of their prices on computers updated minute to minute. MIT economists Alberto Cavallo and Roberto Rigobon have created a “**Billion Prices Project** [link removed],” which scrapes daily online pricing data from retailers to compute real-time inflation. Many other economists have also noted that the employer survey on jobs sometimes contradicts the household survey.

The problem, however, is that Trump did not appoint Antoni to make technical refinements for the sake of better data. He appointed him to cook the numbers. And both things are not possible.

The consumer price numbers that BLS released this week were pretty mixed. **The July increase was only 0.2 percent** [link removed], down from the June rate of 0.3 percent. But core inflation, less food and energy, rose at a 3.1 percent annual rate, which is above the previous several months.

prospect.org/donate

Whatever the eventual effect of Trump’s tariffs, it hasn’t fully shown up in the CPI. So it’s awfully hard, even for Trump, to contend that his enemies have rigged the statistics when the numbers are bad but that the figures are legitimate when they are good.

One of the main consumers of the BLS price data is the Federal Reserve. The Fed looks closely at inflation trends in deciding whether to raise or lower interest rates or keep them the same. The fact that inflation was relatively low in July suggests that the Fed could well make a modest cut in rates at its September meeting, though rising core inflation may cut against that.

The Fed’s economists will be looking intently at any adjustments that Antoni tries to make, either in BLS methods or in revisions after the fact. The Fed system employs some 500 Ph.D. economists and a total of more than 15,000 professional employees, dwarfing the BLS. The Fed could develop its own data series on jobs and prices, reinforcing the role of the Fed as one of the few centers of policy and expertise that Trump doesn’t control. If Antoni succeeds in rigging the BLS numbers, businesses and scholars, as well as the Fed itself, would rely on the Fed’s numbers.

The problem, however, **as economist Teresa Ghilarducci points out** [link removed], is that a variety of laws specify the CPI as the basis for adjustments in everything from Social Security checks, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), annual increases for federal and military pensions, veterans’ benefits, federal tax brackets and penalties, state minimum wages, HUD housing subsidies, and collective-bargaining agreements across the private sector.

So while the Fed can help keep the BLS honest, there is no substitute for data that is free from political manipulation.

**~ ROBERT KUTTNER**

Follow Robert Kuttner on Bluesky [link removed]

[link removed]

To receive this newsletter directly in your inbox, click here to subscribe [link removed]

**Click to Share This Newsletter**

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States
Copyright (c) 2025 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.

To opt out of American Prospect membership messaging, click here [link removed].

To manage your newsletter preferences, click here [link removed].

To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters, click here [link removed].

Sent to: [email protected]

Unsubscribe [link removed]

The American Prospect, Inc., 1225 I Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC xxxxxx, United States