View email in browser. ([link removed])
[link removed]

CounterCurrent:
Education Department Cracks Down on Race-Based Admissions Quotas
The ED’s increased scrutiny on higher ed admissions data will ensure transparency and accountability for the American public

CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the most significant issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Admissions, Transparency, Higher Ed;
Reading Time: ~4 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------


** Featured Article: “U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon Directs National Center for Education Statistics to Collect Universities’ Data on Race Discrimination in Admissions” ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Since the June 2023 Supreme Court decision Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College ([link removed]) (SFFA), which formally declared the use of racial quotas in college admissions illegal and discriminatory under Title VI and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, measures to ensure higher ed’s compliance with the law have been sparse. Until now.

Last Thursday ([link removed]) , U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon instructed ([link removed]) the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) “to collect admissions data for institutions of higher education that will allow Americans to ensure race-based preferences are not used in university admissions processes.” This information will be made publicly available to the American people, providing previously unavailable transparency.

To receive federal funding through Title VI, higher education institutions already complete surveys with the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS)—overseen by the NCES—which collects data related to admissions, enrollment, and financial information. Under President Trump’s directive, Secretary McMahon’s order expands upon this existing data collection by IPEDS. Within 120 days of the Department of Education’s (ED) notice, colleges and universities will be required to make the following changes for the 2025-26 term ([link removed]) :

* The ED’s data collection will be “disaggregated by race and sex relating to the applicant pool, admitted cohort, and enrolled cohort at the undergraduate level, and for specific graduate and professional programs.”
* Colleges and universities will be required to detail “quantitative measures of applicants and admitted students’ academic achievement”—i.e., standardized test scores, GPAs, first-generation-college- student status, and other applicant characteristics, for each race-and-sex pair.
* NCES will expand the scope of the collection for enrolled cohorts to include data for each race-and-sex pair’s graduation rates, final GPAs, financial aid offered, financial aid provided, and other relevant measures. Along with instructing the NCES to determine if any additional information is needed from postsecondary institutions to ensure IPEDS fulfills the mission of providing transparency in admissions.
* Finally, NCES is directed to develop a rigorous quality assurance process for reported data to ensure the information collected by the ED is accurate and reliable.

In releasing its memo, the ED joined the Department of Justice (DOJ) in efforts to curtail race-based programming and activities. Attorney General Pam Bondi released a memo ([link removed]) at the end of last month reminding entities which take federal funding, and are thus subject to federal anti-discrimination laws—like colleges and universities—that proxy discrimination like geographic recruitment is illegal, among other things. Some think the DOJ targeting geographic recruitment ([link removed]) —i.e., recruiting from a specific city, neighborhood, or high school—is unfair, especially as colleges and universities engage in their last minute recruitment efforts before the semester begins.

After SFFA when race-based admissions were barred, geographic targeting/recruitment gained popularity as a way to boost low-income and historically underserved students, bolstering ([link removed]) “racial diversity in incoming classes.” When used as a proxy for race, geographic recruitment is discriminatory. If colleges and universities are truly recruiting students via geographic recruitment without regard to race—like targeting areas where minorities and low-income students live over other areas—the data should leave them with nothing to worry about, right?

The National Association of Scholars has long advocated ([link removed]) for transparency—especially in relation to admissions data and recruitment strategies. Previously, any information regarding detailed admissions data was only obtained through lawsuits or FOIAs, so it is a big step in the right direction to make this information publicly available.

The ED and DOJ’s memos show that the current administration is taking Title VI and the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause seriously. Objective assessments of merit and achievement should be the ruling order of the day, so one can hope that the ED and DOJ’s increased oversight will ensure SFFA compliance that lasts. And that schools will not quietly continue to circumvent the law by passing over qualified students based on race.

Until next week.
Kali Jerrard
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read the Article ([link removed])
For more on admissions, transparency, and higher ed:
[link removed]

August 08, 2025


** Judge Allows Trump’s NSF Directive to Stand During Legal Challenge ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Teresa R. Manning

On Friday, August 1, a Federal District Court in New York gave Trump a win: Judge John P. Cronan allowed the President’s National Science Foundation Directive to remain in effect while being challenged in the court.

[link removed]

August 07, 2025


** UCSD’s $10,000 Scholarship Only for the ‘Right’ Race ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Wenyuan Wu

Today, in an ironic reversal of political and cultural tides, self-righteous, virtue-signaling, and race-baiting elites have replaced the Klansmen as the menacing threat to equal protection.

[link removed]

April 15, 2025


** Report: Ideological Insistence ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------

Mason Goad and Louis Galarowicz

This report chronicles and quantifies the persistent commitment to "diversity, equity, and inclusion" (DEI) in higher education hiring practices.


** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.

============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2025 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.

Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
13 West 36th Street
4th Floor
New York, NY 10018-7138
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.