Dear John,

I want to update you on IJ’s efforts to challenge the spread of warrantless surveillance technology and how our work is encouraging ordinary Americans to speak up for their Fourth Amendment rights.

As technology advances, courts cannot shirk their duty to apply the enduring principles of the Constitution.

Across the nation, we’re witnessing the rapid expansion of automatic license plate reader (ALPR) cameras, many from a company called Flock Safety. These cameras, now in thousands of cities nationwide, systematically record and track the movements of innocent individuals—without a warrant. Unlike traditional red light or speed cameras, Flock’s cameras capture every vehicle that passes, uploading this information into a AI-powered centralized database and creating unique “vehicle fingerprints.” This technology enables authorities to reconstruct a detailed map of your daily movements, all without any suspicion of wrongdoing.

As part of our Project on the Fourth Amendment, IJ filed a first-of-its-kind federal lawsuit against the city of Norfolk, Virginia, over its use of more than 170 ALPRs. There, IJ is representing residents who want police to do what they’ve always done when they track people: Get a warrant.

In February, a judge rejected Norfolk’s attempt to dismiss the case. Belatedly, Flock realized IJ’s lawsuit would not go away and tried to intervene on Norfolk’s side. The judge blocked this, saying the company had gambled on the case being dismissed and allowing them in would “throw this case off the rails.” Now, our lawsuit heads toward trial.

VA_Norfolk-Surveillance_Lee-Schmidt_IFJ_5051-1024x683 ([link removed] )

Norfolk resident and IJ client Lee Schmidt stands by a Flock camera

Our challenge to ALPRs isn’t limited to Norfolk. Recently, IJ sent a letter to Greers Ferry, Arkansas, demanding it remove a camera that was installed directly in front of the home of Charlie and Angie Wolf. The Wolfs, a retired police officer and teacher, had done nothing wrong, but they could not leave their driveway without the city’s camera capturing it. When the couple repeatedly asked the town to move the camera, the town doubled down. But when IJ asked the town to move the camera, the town moved the camera.

Our work and the media attention it’s generated is powering a backlash against ALPR cameras across America. In May, the Denver City Council voted not to renew its contract with Flock after IJ, other civil rights groups, and local residents spoke out against the cameras. Smaller cities have also voted down Flock cameras as more municipalities hit the brakes on this unconstitutional dragnet.

IJ will continue to fight for the right of every American to travel without being tracked by government surveillance. Please consider becoming a donor and supporting this and other work today. ([link removed] )

Together, we are standing up for the promise of the Constitution.

Scott

Scott G. Bullock

President and Chief Counsel

Institute for Justice

Donate Today
([link removed] )

Institute for Justice, 901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900, Arlington, Virginia 22203

Unsubscribe ([link removed] )
Manage preferences ([link removed] )