Decades of misuse and bureaucrat
control caused Washington to lose sight of the Endangered Species
Act’s (ESA)original mission. Rather than helping states manage
their wildlife, Washington treated the ESA as a tool for permanent
federal control rather than a means to restore critical populations.
The original intent was straightforward: help species recover and then
get out of the way. But instead of celebrating successful recoveries,
the federal government too often leaves species locked in red tape,
preventing states from doing what they do best: managing their own
wildlife responsibly and effectively. What started out as a
simple idea first brought to Wyoming Fish and Game Director Angi Bruce
is now one step closer to becoming law. In an early July meeting, Angi
mentioned the idea she had heard, and suggested updating the name of
the ESA to the Endangered Species Recovery Act to better
depict the goal of this legislation. Washington should be striving to
recover the wildlife on the endangered species list, rather than
spending its already-limited resources on species who are already
recovered. The Endangered Species Recovery Act brings
much-needed reform by restoring the law’s true mission.
Representative Harriet Hageman and my legislation recognizes that
endless federal listings don’t help species—results do.
When species meet recovery benchmarks, it’s time to acknowledge
that success, not by keeping them under federal thumb, but by
transitioning stewardship back to states that have earned trust
through years of proven conservation leadership. Wyoming is a
prime example of how local expertise produces results. Our wildlife
agencies know the land, the people, and the species better than
bureaucrats thousands of miles east. They’ve managed complex
ecosystems for decades, and it’s time to empower them. When a
species is thriving, that’s not a cue for more federal
paperwork. It’s a reason to celebrate and a chance to return
responsibility where it belongs: with the states. Happy
Trails, |